The University Patent Portfolio: Goal or Means?

The article addresses the issue of the growing patenting activity in Russia, identified as one of the key indicators in the Concept for Technological Development of the Russian Federation until 2030. The problem under discussion arises from the fact that, despite more than 30 years of the patent system’s existence, a noticeable licensing market in Russia has not yet developed. Consequently, some universities consider the formation of patent portfolios unjustified in the absence of actual licensees. According to statistics, only about 3 % of patents obtained by universities reach the market, while the contribution of universities to Russia’s overall patent activity has been increasing in recent years. This situation contradicts the target indicator of the Concept for Technological Development of the Russian Federation, which calls for a multiple increase in patent activity. To address this issue, the authors propose an approach to the formation and evaluation of university patent portfolios based on  a comprehensive consideration of explicit and implicit factors that determine the feasibility of developing inventive and patenting activities within universities. The paper presents statistics on the patent activity of leading Russian universities, a brief review of publications devoted to the development of university patenting practices, and data illustrating state policy in this fi eld. The experience of Ural Federal University (UrFU) in organizing inventive and patenting activities is analyzed in detail.

It is shown that many universities, including UrFU, when building their patent portfolios, take into account not only the potential direct commercial benefits from managing intellectual property rights, but also other factors—such as the formation of assets based on research results to ensure legal use and minimize practical risks, support for technological entrepreneurship within the university, and the promotion of engineering education. The authors suggest that these factors exert an implicit influence on commonly accepted performance indicators of universities and that their importance for institutional competitiveness will grow under the implementation of Russia’s technological development strategy.

1. Patel A., Germeraad P. New IP strategy agenda. Les Nouvelles Journal of the licensing executives society, 2013, vol. XLVIII, nr 2, pp. 2–4. (In Eng.).

2. Li Sh., Zhang X., Daim T. Measuring strategic technological strength: Patent Portfolio Model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, vol. 157. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120119. (In Eng.).

3. Tokarev R. B. Podkhody k razrabotke marketingovykh strategii upravleniya patentnymi portfolio [Approaches to the development of marketing strategies for managing patent portfolios]. Vestnik GUU, 2017, nr 7–8, pp. 28–33. (In Russ.).

4. Shepelev R. E., Volkov A. T. Kontseptual’naya model’ formirovaniya patentnoi strategii pri vyvode na rynok novogo produkta [Conceptual model of patent strategy formation when launching a new product on the market]. Innovatsii, 2018, nr 5 (235), pp. 102–108. (In Russ.).

5. Li L., Xin D., Yang X., Yu X. How does patent portfolio structure affect patent value in different technological environments? Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, vol. 215. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124127. (In Eng.).

6. Okutan V., Kasapoğlu M. Z. Strategic portfolio management of university-owned patents for commercializing inventions. World Patent Information, 2024, vol. 79, nr 28. doi 10.1016/j.wpi.2024.102306 (In Eng.).

7. Du Y., Wang M., Yin Y. Research on innovation cooperation network of Chinese universities based on patent data. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2024, vol. 71. doi 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101784 (In Eng.)

8. Hockaday T. Phases of Growth in University technology transfer. Journal of the Licensing Executives Society Internations, 2013, vol. XLVIII, nr 4. (In Eng.).

9. Jung J., Kim S., Yoon B. A data-driven approach to establishing a patent strategy by generating a patent map based on generative topographic mapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, vol. 208. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124325 (In Eng.).

10. Gulai A. V., Gurko A. I., Sakhnovich T. A., Yudina S. V. Modelirovanie upravleniya patentnoi aktivnost’yu khozyaistvuyushchikh sub”ektov [Modeling the management of patent activity of business entities]. Mir novoi ekonomiki, 2024, nr 1, pp. 116–125. (In Russ.).

11. Voronov V. S., Smirnova V. R. Nauchno-metodicheskie osnovy formirovaniya otraslevoi molodezhnoi ekosistemy izobretatel’stva v Rossii [Scientific and methodological foundations for the formation of a sectoral youth ecosystem of invention in Russia]. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2023, nr 4 (91), pp. 20–35. doi 10.34286/1955-4638-2023-91-4-20-35. (In Russ.).

12. Vysochanskaya Yu. S., Morgunov S. V. Obzor patentnoi strategii meditsinskikh vuzov Programmy «Prioritet 2030» [Overview of the patent strategy of medical universities of the “Priority 2030” Program]. Medicus, 2022, nr 5 (47), pp. 23-32. (In Russ.).

13. Filatov D. V., Aleksandrova A. S., Shul’gin D. B. Teoretiko-igrovaya model’ upravleniya pravami na RID v kooperatsionnykh proektakh universitetov [Game-theoretic model of intellectual property rights management in university cooperation projects]. Ekonomika. Pravo. Innovatsii, 2023, nr 4, pp. 69–80. (In Russ.).

14. Isaev A. P., Fomin N. I. Izobretatel’skaya deyatel’nost’ v vuze: osobennosti i vozmozhnosti aktivizatsii [Inventive activity at a university: features and opportunities for activation]. Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept», 2024, nr 7, pp. 136–154. doi 10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11110. (In Russ.).