«Economy of Scale» or «Economy of Scope»: What Universities Should Rely on in the Competitive Struggle?
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.01.010
Abstract
This conceptual article presents microeconomic approaches to analyzing the shifts in universities’ expenses and the saving effects of the scale and scope of HEI’s activities. The authors provide an overview of econometric studies which assess the effects considered for universities in some countries. As a result, there comes to be questioned the economic feasibility of consolidating and expanding the universities’ activities, the reasonability of combining research with educational activities. The discussion concerns the transformation of the universities’ economy in the context of education digitalization, the prospects of the «economy of scale» and the «economy of scope» to be compared. The conclusions are drawn on the possible benefit for large universities, on its consequences for competition in higher education, and on the partnership benefits for all market players.
About the Authors
P. V. Derkachev
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Derkachev – PhD (Economics), Leading Research Fellow, Institute of Education, Centre for Financial and Economic
Decisions in Education
16 Potapovsky Pereulok, Building 10, Moscow, 101000
+7 926 221-08-06
K. V. Zinkovsky
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill V. Zinkovsky – PhD (Economics), Programme Academic Supervisor «Management in Higher Education», Institute of
Education
16 Potapovsky Pereulok, Building 10, Moscow, 101000
I. A. Kravchenko
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Kravchenko – Analyst, Centre for Financial and Economic Decisions in Education, Institute of Education
16 Potapovsky Pereulok, Building 10, Moscow, 101000
K. A. Semenova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kristina A. Semenova – Analyst, Centre for Financial and Economic Decisions in Education, Institute of Education
16 Potapovsky Pereulok, Building 10, Moscow, 101000
References
1. Zinkovsky K. V., Derkachev P. V. Restrukturizat siya sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: otsenka rezul’tatov ob”edinenii vuzov [Higher Education System Restructuring: Evaluating Results of University Mergers]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2016, nr 6, pp. 135–145. doi 10.15826/umj.2016.106.067. (In Russ.).
2. Johnes G., Johnes J., Thanassoulis E. An Analysis of Costs in Institutions of Higher Education in England. Studies in Higher Education, 2006, vol. 33, nr 5, pp. 527–549. doi 10.1080/03075070802372901. (In Eng.).
3. Cohn E., Rhine S. L. W., Santos M. C. Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Firms: Economies of Scale and Scope. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, vol. 71, nr 2, pp. 284–290. doi 10.2307/1926974. (In Eng.).
4. Worthington A. C., Higgs H. Economies of Scale and Scope in Australian Higher Education. Higher Education, 2011, vol. 61, nr 4, pp. 387–414. doi 10.1007/s10734-010-9337-3. (In Eng.).
5. Koshal R. K., Koshal M. Economies of Scale and Scope in Higher Education: a Case of Comprehensive Universities. Economics of Education Review, 1999, vol. 18, pp. 269–277. doi 10.1016/s0272-7757(98)00035-1. (In Eng.).
6. Nelson R., Heverth K. T. Effect of Class Size on Economies of Scale and Marginal Costs in Higher Education. Applied Economics, 1992, vol. 24, pp. 473–482. doi 10.1080/00036849200000061. (In Eng.).
7. Groot H. de, McMahon W. W., Volkwein J. F. The Cost Structure of American Research Universities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991, vol. 73, nr 3, pp. 424–431. doi 10.2307/2109566. (In Eng.).
8. Toutkoushian R. K. The Value of Cost Functions for Policymaking and Institutional Research. Research in Higher Education, 1999, vol. 40, nr 1, pp. 1–15. doi 10.1023/a:1018718226489. (In Eng.).
9. Laband D. N., Lentz B. F. New Estimates of Economies of Scale and Scope in Higher Education. Southern Economic Journal, 2003, vol. 70, nr 1, pp. 172–183. doi 10.2307/1061638. (In Eng.).
10. Daghbashyan Z. The Economic Efficiency of Swedish Higher Education Institutions. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation (CESIS), Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011, 23 p. (In Eng.).
11. Nemoto J., Furumatsu N. Scale and Scope Economies of Japanese Private Universities Revisited with an Input Distance Function Approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2014, vol. 41, nr 2, pp. 213–226. doi 10.1007/s11123-013-0378-3. (In Eng.).
12. Dundar H., Lewis D. R. Departmental Productivity in American Universities: Economies of Scale and Scope. Economics of Education Review, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 199–244. doi 10.1016/0272-7757(95)90393-m. (In Eng.).
13. Hashimoto K., Cohn E. Economies of Scale and Scope in Japanese Private Universities. Education Economics, 1997, vol. 5, pp. 107–116. doi 10.1080/09645299700000010. (In Eng.).
14. Zhang L., Worthington A. C. Scale and Scope Economies of Distance Education in Australian Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 42, nr 9, pp. 1785–1799. doi 10.1080/03075079.2015.1126817. (In Eng.).
15. Morris D. Economies of Scale and Scope in E-Learning. Studies in Higher Education, 2008, vol. 33, nr 3, pp. 331–343. doi 10.1080/03075070802066164. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Derkachev P.V., Zinkovsky K.V., Kravchenko I.A., Semenova K.A. «Economy of Scale» or «Economy of Scope»: What Universities Should Rely on in the Competitive Struggle? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(1):131-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.01.010
Views:
765
Email this article 