The culture of spatial organization as a factor of competitiveness of university
Abstract
The article is devoted to practical questions of formation university architectural environment and to the
culture of organization in the new conditions of transition of Russian universities to the Bolognese standard.
The genesis of formation of architectural environment, influenced on the models of leading world universities,
and the experience of west universities and campuses are presented
culture of organization in the new conditions of transition of Russian universities to the Bolognese standard.
The genesis of formation of architectural environment, influenced on the models of leading world universities,
and the experience of west universities and campuses are presented
About the Authors
Александр Стариков
Уральская государственная архитектурно-художественная академия
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. V. Pouchkov
Russian Federation
References
1. Арефьев А. Я. Китайские студенты в России // Высшее образование в России. 2010. № 12. С. 54-66.
2. Коган Л. Н. Теория культуры. Свердловск : Изд- во Урал. ун-та, 1994.
3. "Сколково" навсегда : интервью президента фонда Сколково Виктора Вексельберга [Электронный ресурс] URL: lenta.ru/articles/2010/11/12/skolkovo
4. Эскизный проект застройки территории I оче реди строительства Уральского федерального универ ситета имени первого Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина в г. Екатеринбурге : (пояснит. зап. с прил.). Екатеринбург : Урал. гос. арх.-худож. акад., 2010.
5. A vision for Towson University // Master Plan Executive Summary. 2003. Sept.
6. Campys partners Colabus OHIO. Washington : ULI, 1995.
7. New centery plan : Stratgic plan for capital investment university of California. Berkeley, 2003.
8. The university of Texas at austhin. Viebook, 2008 2009.
9. University of California, Mersed : Catalog. 2007-2008.
10. University Park Tallahassee, Florida., Washington : ULI, 2002.
Review
For citations:
, Pouchkov M.V. The culture of spatial organization as a factor of competitiveness of university. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2011;(2):15-29. (In Russ.)
Views:
477
Email this article 