From Aggregated Cost Accounting to a Program-Based Financial Model: A Pilot Transformation in University Management
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.008
Abstract
This article explores the need for universities to transition to a program-based financial model, in which the educational program is considered the key unit of economic analysis and management decision-making.
The relevance of this work stems from the limitations of traditional approaches based on aggregated cost accounting, which do not adequately assess the economics of individual educational programs and make informed management decisions in the face of increasing competition and resource constraints.
This paper analyzes existing approaches to cost assessment in higher education, identifies their limitations, and proposes a tool for detailed cost accounting at the educational program level. This study developed and tested an approach to allocating direct and indirect costs, including salaries, infrastructure maintenance, and general university expenses.
The novelty of this proposed approach lies, firstly, in its accurate attribution of faculty salaries to a specific educational program at a large university with complex cross-departmental relationships. Secondly, the correct distribution of university-wide (indirect and overhead) costs between programs by using coefficients characterizing the capacity of academic buildings and the number of students should be considered new.
The empirical part of the study is pilot in nature, based on data from a specific university (KNRTU-KAI) and four bachelor’s degree programs (EP, EP of HE). For each, annual expenses and the cost per student were calculated, and the results were compared with the actual cost of tuition.
Furthermore, the article emphasizes the need to integrate qualitative performance indicators (demand for graduates, strategic significance of the program) into the portfolio management system for educational programs.
The obtained results substantiate the need to move to an analysis of the economics of educational programs in the university management system, as well as the integration of economic and qualitative indicators in the formation of the portfolio of educational programs. The proposed approach requires further testing on an expanded sample of universities and taking into account differences in organizational models.
About the Authors
S. V. YudinaKazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev – KAI
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Yudina, Dr. hab (Economics), Associate Professor, Professor, Director of the Institute
Department of Economic Theory and Resource Management; Institute of Engineering Economics and Entrepreneurship
420111; 10 Karl Marx St.; Kazan
kai@kai.ru
A. B. Nikolaeva
Kazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev – KAI
Russian Federation
Anna B. Nikolaeva, PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department, Deputy Director of the Institute
Department of Economics and Business Management; Institute of Engineering Economics and Entrepreneurship
420111; 10 Karl Marx St.; Kazan
kai@kai.ru
A. A. Platonova
Kazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev – KAI
Russian Federation
Anastasiya A. Platonova, 4th year student
Institute of Engineering Economics and Entrepreneurship
420111; 10 Karl Marx St.; Kazan
kai@kai.ru
References
1. Ekonomika vysshego obrazovaniya: tendentsii razvitiya v mire i Rossii : analiticheskii doklad-daidzhest Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Economics of Higher Education: Development Trends in the World and Russia: Analytical Digest Report of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], Moscow, 2021, 193 p. (In Russ.).
2. Lukichev P. M. Ekonomika vysshego obrazovaniya Rossii: perspektivy razvitiya i uluchsheniya [Economics of Higher Education in Russia: Development and Improvement Prospects]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta, 2020, vol. 30, iss. 2, pp. 216–221. (In Russ.).
3. Sandler D. G., Gladyrev D. A. Obzor empiricheskikh issledovanii faktorov ekonomicheskoi rezul’tativnosti rossiiskikh universitetov [Review of Empirical Studies of Factors Affecting the Economic Performance of Russian Universities]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2021, vol. 12, nr 4, pp. 37–49. (In Russ.).
4. Kogat’ko N. I., Plotnikov V. A. Stoimost’ obucheniya v organizatsiyakh vysshego obrazovaniya: problemy otsenivaniya [Tuition fees in higher education institutions: assessment issues]. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii, 2021, vol. 3 (49), рp. 27–31. (In Russ.).
5. Dmitrienko A. Faktory tsenoobrazovaniya v rossiiskikh gosudarstvennykh vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh [Pricing factors in Russian public higher education institutions]. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal NIU VShE, 2021, vol. 25 (3), рp. 379–402. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-379-402. (In Russ.).
6. Osipova T. Yu., Tarasova A. E. Sravnitel’nyi analiz stoimosti realizatsii obrazovatel’nykh programm vysshego obrazovaniya [Comparative analysis of the cost of implementing educational programs in higher education]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola, 2025, vol. 1 (157), рp. 119–127. DOI: 10.34020/1993-4386-2025-1-119-127. (In Russ.).
7. Askari M. Y., Refae G. A. E. Funding higher education as a strategic good of a nation. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 2023, vol. 25, nr 1, рр. 161–171. (In Eng.).
8. Jones G. Economic approaches to school efficiency. In: The Economics of Education, Academic Press, 2020, рр. 479–489. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00035-5. (In Eng.).
9. Snowdon K. College and University Baccalaureate Degrees: Another Look at Costs. Toronto, Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2022, 67 р. (In Eng.).
10. Karim A. M. et al. The impact of educational management on the higher education: International perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2024, vol. 14, nr 1, рр. 427–439. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20462. (In Eng.).
11. Ramírez-Montoya M. S. et al. Trends for the future of education programs for professional development. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, nr 13, рр. 7244–7261. DOI: 10.3390/su13137244. (In Eng.).
12. Sankaran S., Saad N. Evaluating the bachelor of education program based on the context, input, process, and product model. Frontiers in Education, 2022, vol. 7, art. 924374. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.924374. (In Eng.).
13. Cunha J. M., Miller T. Measuring value-added in higher education: Possibilities and limitations in the use of administrative data. Economics of Education Review, 2014, vol. 42, pp. 64–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.06.001. (In Eng.).
14. Escueta M., Nickow A. J., Oreopoulos P., Quan V. Upgrading Education with Technology: Insights from Experimental Research. Journal of Economic Literature, 2020, vol. 58 (4), pp. 897–996. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20191507. (In Eng.).
15. Guzman M., McGuinness S., Turner L. J. The Influence of Mega Universities on college competition and outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 2025, art. 102688. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102688. (In Eng.).
16. Britton J., Dearden L., Waltmann B., van der Erve L. The impact of undergraduate degrees on lifetime earnings. Report of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, available at: https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/R167-The-impact-of-undergraduate-degrees-on-lifetime-earnings.pdf (accessed 20. 06. 2025). (In Eng.).
17. Azoev G. L. Rentabel’naya stoimost’ studencheskoi uchebnoi gruppy i korrektirovka portfelya obrazovatel’nykh programm [Profitable cost of a student study group and adjustment of the educational programs’ portfolio]. Vestnik universiteta, 2023, nr 5, pp. 141–150. (In Russ.).
18. Guseva A. I., Vesna E. B. Otsenka rezul’tativnosti i effektivnosti setevykh obrazovatel’nykh programm [Assessing the Performance and Efficiency of Network Educational Programs]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2013, nr 6, available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=11000 (accessed 18. 04. 2026). (In Russ.).
19. Aganbegyan A. G. Effektivnost’ obrazovaniya, osobenno vysshego ekonomicheskogo obrazovaniya [Efficiency of education, especially higher economic education]. Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 2023, vol. 239, nr 1, pp. 45–79. (In Russ.).
20. Golovanova S. S. Effektivnost’ finansirovaniya vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Efficiency of higher education funding]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya, 2007, nr 1, pp. 131–133. (In Russ.).
21. Bazhenova V. I., Sudakova A. E., Gurban I. A. Regional’nye sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii: rezul’taty reformirovaniya i effektivnost’ upravleniya [Regional systems of higher education in the Russian Federation: results of reforming and management efficiency]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova, 2017, vol. 6 (96), pp. 163–175. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2017-6-163-175. (In Russ.).
22. Kostrov I. V. Effektivnost’ sistemy vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya i ee otsenka [Efficiency of the higher professional education system and its assessment]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: informatsiya, analitika, prognozy, 2021, nr 4, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.).
23. Bebenina E. V. Effektivnost’ vysshego obrazovaniya kak faktor prirashcheniya chelovecheskogo kapitala [Efficiency of higher education as a factor of the increase of human capital]. Tsennosti i smysly, 2022, vol. 1 (77), pp. 53–71. (In Russ.).
24. Sukhorukova D. V. Effektivnost’ kontrolya kachestva natsional’noi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya [Efficiency of quality control of the national system of higher education]. Samoupravleniye, 2023, vol. 1 (134), pp. 920–923. (In Russ.).
25. Komshanov D. S. Ekonomika obrazovatel’noy programmy vuza [Economics of the University Educational Program]. In: Sel’skoe khozyaistvo – draiver razvitiya regionov : materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Agriculture as a driver of regions’ development : Materials of the International scientific and practical conference], Velikiye Luki, April 21, 2022. Velikiye Luki, Velikiye Luki State Agricultural Academy, 2022, pp. 13–18. (In Russ.).
26. Sarantseva E. G., Chelmakina L. A. Analiz ekonomicheskoi ustoichivosti obrazovatel’nykh organizatsii vysshego obrazovaniya [Analysis of the economic sustainability of educational organizations of higher education]. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava, 2023, nr 4–2, pp. 260–267. DOI: 10.17513/vaael.2795. (In Russ.).
27. Klochkova A. V., Sharonova A. A. Akademicheskaya sreda: tochki rosta [Academic environment: growth points]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo, 2018, nr 1, pp. 117–130. (In Russ.).
28. Tret’yakova T. V., Ignat’ev V. P., Ammosov I. N., Daramaeva A. A. Monitoring effektivnosti realizatsii obrazovatel’nykh programm vysshego obrazovaniya [Monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of educational programs of higher education]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2017, nr 3, pp. 102–106. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-110-118. (In Russ.).
29. Pyurbeev S. V., Sangadzhiev B. V., Barlykova V. A. [i dr.]. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ obrazovatel’nykh programm: otsenka i analiz [Economic efficiency of educational programs: assessment and analysis]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2025, vol. 3 (176), pp. 1345–1351. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2025.176.3.241. (In Russ.).
30. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 26 iyunya 2015 goda № 640 “O poryadke formirovaniya gosudarstvennogo zadaniya na okazanie gosudarstvennykh uslug (vypolnenie rabot) v otnoshenii federal’nykh gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdenii i finansovogo obespecheniya vypolneniya gosudarstvennogo zadaniya” [Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 26, 2015 No. 640 “On the procedure for forming a state assignment for the provision of public services (performance of work) in relation to the federal government agencies and financial support for the implementation of the state assignment”], available at: http://government.ru/docs/all/102557/ (accessed 20. 06. 2025). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Yudina S.V., Nikolaeva A.B., Platonova A.A. From Aggregated Cost Accounting to a Program-Based Financial Model: A Pilot Transformation in University Management. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2026;30(1):108-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.008
JATS XML



























.png)