Effectiveness Evaluation of Higher Education in Technical-Engeneering Specialties: Retention Rate

   The article analyzes the effectiveness of education based on the results of admission to state-funded places in engineering and technical specialties at Russian universities. The retention rate is considered as an indicator that complements the universal indicators of the Russian Ministry of Higher Education and Science’s Monitoring, and characterizes the quality of admission, the educational process, and educational outcomes.

   The aim of the study is to develop a typology of training programs based on admission and completion indicators, taking into account the significance of the retention rate indicators.

   Based on data from the VPO-1 form of the Ministry for the period from 2014 to 2024, the influence of the dynamics of budget place redistribution in favor of engineering and technical specialties on changes in the retention rate is analyzed. It is concluded that an increase in the number of state-funded places in engineering and technical fields generally does not lead to a corresponding increase in the number of graduates. It is revealed that the gap between admission and graduation is particularly pronounced in regional universities, where the retention rate is significantly lower than in metropolitan universities. The analysis was conducted both for the Russian Federation as a whole and for individual subjects of the Russian Federation, including the Krasnoyarsk Region and the city of Moscow. It is shown that engineering and technical fields form a separate type of training, characterized by a decrease in the retention rate when budget places are redistributed in their favor. Based on the conducted research, recommendations are formulated on improving the management of budget place allocation for engineering and technical specialties for executive authorities and founders of higher education institutions in the Russian Federation.

1. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates. 2022. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/ctr (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

2. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. Persistence and Retention – 2023. URL: https://nscresearchcenter.org/persistence-retention (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

3. College Transitions. Retention and Graduation Rates. 2023. URL: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/retention-and-graduation-rates (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

4. Chen X. STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and Out of STEM Fields. NCES 2014-001. URL: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

5. University of Texas News. Hands-On Approach Boosts STEM Retention. 2016. URL: https://news.utexas.edu/2016/06/01/hands-on-approach-boosts-graduation-rates-stem-retention (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

6. Times Union. Solving the College Dropout Crisis in New York. 2024. URL: https://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/commentary-new-york-solving-college-drop-out-20352859.php (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

7. Dropout and Completion in Higher Education in Europe / CHEPS, NIFU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. 124 p. (accessed: 28. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

8. OECD. Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. DOI: 10.1787/eag-2023-en (accessed: 28. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

9. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). Non-continuation: UK Performance Indicators 2023. URL: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/performance-indicators/non-continuation (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

10. Netherlands Education Inspectorate. Higher Education Institutional Reports, 2022. URL: https://english.onderwijsin-spectie.nl/publications/reports/2022/11/10/higher-education-institutional-reports (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

11. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Bildung und Kultur: Hochschulen auf einen Blick. Wiesbaden, 2023. URL: https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Education-Research-Culture/Higher-Education/_node.html (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

12. Ministère de l‘Éducation nationale et de la Jeunesse (France). SIES – Repères et références statistiques sur les enseignements. Paris, 2023. URL: https://www.education.gouv.fr/reperes-et-references-statistiques-2023-341139 (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

13. Eurostat. Early leavers from education and training, 2024. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/education-and-training (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

14. Eurydice. Structural Indicators for Monitoring Education and Training Systems. 2023. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/56f43ae0-82c4-11ed-a05c-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

15. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. National Undergraduate Teaching Evaluation Report. Beijing, 2021. URL: http://en.moe.gov.cn/documents/reports/2021.html (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

16. Bianchi F. Accountability Mechanisms in Chinese Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12285. (In Eng.)

17. OECD. Benchmarking the Performance of China’s Education System. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020. URL: https://www.oecd.org/education/benchmarking-performance-china-2020.pdf (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

18. Cheng Y., Wang J. Quality assurance awareness in higher education in China. SpringerOpen, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s40536-022-00115-0. (In Eng.)

19. Marginson S., Xu X. The politics of university rankings in China. Higher Education, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-023-01014-y. (In Eng.)

20. Lopukhin A. M. Effektivnost’ otsenki uchrezhdeniy vysshego obrazovaniya na primere universiteta v monogorode [Effectiveness of Evaluating Higher Education Institutions: The Case of a Single-Industry Town University]. Upravlenie naukoy: teoriya i praktika, 2025, T. 7, nr 1, pp. 55–66. DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2025.7.1.4. (In Russ.)

21. Pugach V. F. Konkurs pri postuplenii v vuzy, priem i vypusk: vyyavlenie vzaimosvyazi [University Admission Competition, Enrollment and Graduation: Revealing the Relationship]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2014, nr 3, pp. 129-134. (In Russ.)

22. Gruzdev I. A., Gorbunova E. V., Frumin I. D. Studencheskiy otsev v rossiyskikh vuzakh: k postanovke problemy [Student Dropout in Russian Universities: Problem Statement]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2013, nr 2, pp. 67–81. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2013-2-67-81. (In Russ.)

23. Smyk A. F., Prusova V. I., Zimanov L. L., Solntsev A. A. Analiz masshtaba i prichin otseva studentov v tekhnicheskom universitete [Analysis of Scale and Causes of Student Dropout in a Technical University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2019, T. 28, nr 6, pp. 52–62. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-6-52-62. (In Russ.)

24. Shmeleva A. A., Frumin I. D. Faktory otseva studentov inzhenerno-tekhnicheskogo profilya v rossiyskikh universitetakh [Factors of Dropout among Engineering Students in Russian Universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2020, nr 5, pp. 89–103. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/401862503.pdf (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Russ.)

25. Barabashev A. G. Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ego vliyanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigmy gosudarstva i byurokratii [The Crisis of Public Administration and Its Impact on Core Administrative Paradigms of the State and Bureaucracy]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya, 2016, nr 3, pp. 163–194. (In Russ.)

26. Davis K. E., Kingsbury B., Merry S. E. Indicators as a technology of global governance. Law & Society Review, 2012, Vol. 46, nr 1, pp. 71–104. (In Eng.)

27. Barabashev A., Makarov I., Zarochintcev S. How to shape government policies on high-technology development using the indicative evaluation of risks? Administratie si Management Public, 2022, nr 38, pp. 70–89. DOI: 10.24818/amp/2022.38-04. (In Eng.)

28. Tinto V. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press, 1993. 296 p. (In Eng.)

29. Bean J. P., Metzner B. S. A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition. Review of Educational Research, 1985, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 485–540. (In Eng.)

30. Astin A. Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Development, 1984, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 297–308. (In Eng.)

31. Bianchi N. The Indirect Effects of Educational Expansions: Evidence from a Large Enrollment Increase in University Majors. NBER Working Paper No. 26870. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020. DOI: 10.3386/w26870. (In Eng.)

32. Simpson O. Student Support in Online Learning—We Need to Talk About Money. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2023, Vol. 24, nr 4. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7241. URL: https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/7241 (accessed: 21. 06. 2025). (In Eng.)

33. Zernov V. A., Darda I. V., Zhidkov A. A. Akkreditatsionnyy monitoring programm vysshego obrazovaniya: pokazateli i metodika ikh rascheta [Accreditation Monitoring of Higher Education Programs: Indicators and Methodology of Their Calculation]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today, 2023, nr 1, pp. 10–18 (In Russ.).