Platformization of University-Business Interaction: Concept and Implementation Experience
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2025.03.023
Abstract
The article presents a case study of the Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (NSUEM) that describes the experience of designing a specialized project activity platform supporting the implementation of projects for external clients. The study includes an analysis and classification of university platforms, revealing the dichotomous nature of their purposes. Modeling the ecosystem of project activity participants at NSUEM and their interaction processes demonstrated that the foundation of a university platform should be based on the exchange of values among all ecosystem participants. The article also provides a description of the initial results from the pilot operation of NSUEM’s specialized project activity platform. This university case can serve as a useful reference for higher education institutions seeking to align their project activities with the implementation of external client projects.
About the Authors
O. V. Milekhina
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Milekhina – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Informatics
56 Kamenskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630099
P. M. Pashkov
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petr M. Pashkov – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Informatics
56 Kamenskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630099
N. S. Ermashkevich
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Ermashkevich – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Applied Informatics
56 Kamenskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630099
P. A. Novgorodov
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel A. Novgorodov – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Rector
56 Kamenskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630099
References
1. Melnik A. D., Merenkov A. V., Sandler D. G. Proektnoe obuchenie v peredovyh inzhenernyh shkolah: operezhayushee obrazovanie lichnosti [Project-Based learning in advanced engineering schools: Keeping personal education ahead of the curve]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya, 2025, vol. 29 (2), pp. 282–299. doi 10.15507/1991-9468.029.202502.282-299 (In Russ.).
2. Savchuk G. A., Kul’pin S. V., Kul’minskaya A. V. Motivy vovlechennosti v proektnoe obuchenie v vuze: otsenka mnenii rabotodatelei i studentov [Motives for involvement in project-based learning at a university: Assessing the opinions of employers and students]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2024, vol. 28 (2), pp. 81–95. doi 10.15826/umpa.2024.02.017 (In Russ.).
3. Milekhina O. V., Aslanova I. V., Sirik E. E. Koordinatsiya deistvii universitetov i biznesa: razrabotka datatsentrichnogo instrumenta vzaimodeistviya [Coordination of actions between universities and business: Development of a data-centric interaction tool]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2024, vol. 28 (1), pp. 50–70. doi 10.15826/umpa.2024.01.004 (In Russ.).
4. Shkarina T. Yu., Puzyreva A. A., Trushchenko A. N. Modeli vzaimodeistviya mezhdu obrazovaniem i biznesom: analiz, tendentsii i perspektivy [Models of interaction between education and business: analysis, trends and prospects]. Izvestiya TulGU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2024, vol. 8, pp. 64-69. doi 10.24412/2071-6168-2024-8-64-65 (In Russ.).
5. Chekha V. V. Tsifrovye platformy kak novye sub”ekty obrazovatel’nykh otnoshenii [Digital platforms as new subjects in education]. Nauka i shkola, 2021, vol. 3, pp. 81–93. doi 10.31862/1819-463X-2021-3-81-93. (In Russ.).
6. Dubko N. A. Tsifrovaya platforma kak mekhanizm vzaimodeistviya nauki, obrazovaniya i innovatsionnogo predprinimatel’stva [Digital platform of the Vitebsk region as a mechanism of interaction of science, education, and innovative entrepreneurship]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 35–39. doi 10.52928/2070-1632-2021-57-6-35-39. (In Russ.).
7. Yashina A. V. Platformennye resheniya i obshchestvennye prostranstva kak fabriki raspredelennogo proizvodstva znaniya [Platform solutions and public spaces as distributed knowledge factories]. Filosofskaya mysl’, 2020, vol. 4, pp. 1–13. doi 10.25136/2409-8728.2020.4.32483. (In Russ.).
8. Karlik A. E., Shirokov S. N., Maksimtsev I. A., Yakovleva E. A. Platforma vzaimodeistviya vuzov i predpriyatii nauchno-proizvodstvennogo kompleksa v Rossii [Platform for interaction between universities and enterprises of scientific-industrial complex in Russia]. Planirovanie i obespechenie podgotovki kadrov dlya promyshlenno-ekonomicheskogo kompleksa regiona, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 113–118. (In Russ.).
9. Chvanova M. S., Kiseleva I. A., Skvortsov A. A. Razrabotka prototipa tsifrovoi krossplatformy vzaimodeistviya i upravleniya innovatsionno-obrazovatel’nym protsessom universiteta naukograda [Development of the prototype of digital cross-platform for interaction and management of the innovative educational process of the science city university]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2022, vol. 56 (2), pp. 657-669. doi 10.32744/pse.2022.2.39. (In Russ.).
10. Shuklina E. A., Pevnaya M. V. Predpriyatiya i vuzy regiona: formy setevykh vzaimodeistvii v otsenkakh ekspertov [Enterprises and universities of the region: forms of network interactions]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2018, vol. 22 (3), pp. 86–99. doi 10.15826/umpa.2018.03.029. (In Russ.).
11. Kleiner G. B. Sovremennyi universitet kak ekosistema: instituty mezhdistsiplinarnogo upravleniya [University as an ecosystem: Institutes of interdisciplinary management]. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019, vol. 11 (3), pp. 54–63. doi 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.054-063 (In Russ.).
12. Danilin I. V. Vliyanie tsifrovykh tekhnologii na liderstvo v global’nykh protsessakh: ot platform k rynkam? [The impact of digital technologies on leadership in global processes: from platforms to markets?]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 2020, vol. 13 (1), pp. 100–116. doi 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-100-116. (In Russ.).
13. Bulgatova Yu. S., Radnaeva D. B., Dasheev A. A. Osobennosti razvitiya sfery obrazovaniya v ramkakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki [Features of the development of education sector in the context of digital economy]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2021, vol. 3, pp. 40‒45. doi 10.18101/2304-4446-2021-3-40-45. (In Russ.).
14. Khasanov M. M., Galeev R. M., Margarit A. M., Krasnov F. V. Printsipy postroeniya tsifrovoi platformy dlya nauchno-tekhnicheskogo tsentra [Digital platform buildup principles for science and technology center]. Vestnik kibernetiki, 2019, vol. 4 (36), pp. 66–73. (In Russ.).
15. Ryzhkova M. V., Chikov M. V. Institutsional’naya priroda tsifrovykh platform [Institutional nature of digital platforms]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2019, vol. 4, pp. 72–80. doi 10.18101/2304-4446-2019-4-72-80. (In Russ.).
16. Pashkov P., Pelykh V. A conceptual framework of developing ecosystem strategies for digital financial services. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Moscow, 2021, pp. 48–58. (In Russ.).
17. Ermashkevich N. S., Pashkov P. M. Kontseptsiya arkhitektury ekosistemy proektnogo obucheniya v universitete [Concept of the architecture of the project-based learning ecosystem in the university]. In: Materialy Vseross. nauch. konf. «Inzhiniring predpriyatii i upravlenie znaniyami (IP&UZ-2023)» [Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific conference “Engineering companies and knowledge management”], Moscow, 2023, pp. 98–109. (In Russ.).
18. Evstratova L. A., Isaeva N. V., Leshukov O. V. (eds.). Proektnoe obuchenie. Praktiki vnedreniya v universitetakh [Project-based learning. Implementation of practices at the universities], Moscow, Otkrytyi universitet Skolkovo, 2018, 149 p. (In Russ.).
19. Il’in D. Yu. Metodika vybora komponentov steka tekhnologii tsifrovykh platform na osnove nechetkoi logiki [Software component selection methodology based on fuzzy logic for digital platform design]. Vestnik SibGUTI, 2020, vol. 3 (51), pp. 38–46. (In Russ.).
20. Lukinova O. V. Voprosy proektirovaniya tsifrovykh platform v paradigme otkrytykh sistem [Digital platform design issues in the open systems paradigm]. In: Materialy mezhdunar. konf. «Upravlenie razvitiem krupnomasshtabnykh sistem» (MLSD’2018) [Proceedings of the international conference “Large-scale systems management development”], Moscow, Institut problem upravleniya im. V. A. Trapeznikova RAN, 2018, pp. 304–306. (In Russ.).
21. Novozhilov K. S., Golubev D. V., Entin N. I. Yavlenie platformizatsii i analiz arkhitektury tsifrovykh platform [Platformization phenomenon and digital platform architecture analysis]. Colloquium-Journal, 2019, vol. 15 (39), pp. 33–34. doi 10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10458. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Milekhina O.V., Pashkov P.M., Ermashkevich N.S., Novgorodov P.A. Platformization of University-Business Interaction: Concept and Implementation Experience. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2025;29(3):102-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2025.03.023
Views:
229
JATS XML
.png)
Email this article 