ACADEMIC CAREERS IN THE SPECTRUM OF POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS' PROFESSIONAL PREFERENCES

The authors present a case study of the Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod concerning the motivation and professional plans of postgraduate students, as well as the factors that influence their choice of an academic career. Peculiarities of professional interests of postgraduate students enrolled in natural sciences, social sciences and humanities programs are considered. Research method: a standardized on-line questionnaire survey of postgraduate students (N = 427). The sample adequately reflects the proportions of the university's doctoral school by subject, age and gender. It was established that the previous experience of studying at the same university, the reputation of a faculty or a specific doctoral program play the main role among the factors that determine the choice of the university when students enroll in the doctoral school. Over 80 % of postgraduate students did not consider other universities as a possible place of study. It was also found that the focus on professional activities in the field of science and higher education clearly expressed at the beginning of training can change in the course of studies. The proportion of postgraduate students who retain their steady focus on academic professions essentially depends on the area of studies and amounts to an average of about 55 %. Postgraduate students who study in social sciences and humanities often switch to a «non-academic» career path, since they are not ready for territorial mobility. The authors substantiate their conclusion that the low level of territorial mobility is one of the key factors that reduce the effectiveness of the institution of doctoral education in relation to the implementation of its main function of reproducing the human potential of science and higher education. Following the analysis of empirical data, possible measures aimed at increasing the effectiveness of doctoral programs are discussed: developing a system of grant support for dissertational research, enhancing the links between dis-sertational subjects and major research projects, diversification of doctoral programs, introducing professional degrees into the legal framework (for example, in such fields as public administration, management and business, jurisprudence, education). The results of this research may be of interest to academic and administrative personnel of higher educational institutions involved in doctoral education management.

preparation of academic and research personnel, doctoral school, postgraduate students' motivation and career plans, academic labor market, effectiveness of doctoral education, territorial mobility

1. Бедный Б. И. Новая модель аспирантуры: pro et contra // Высшее образование в России. 2017. № 4. С. 5-16.

2. Gruzdev I., Terentev E. Life after PhD: What Careers Do PhD Students in Russia Consider? Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2016, no. 3 (9), pp. 20-21.

3. Maloshonok N. Doctoral Students' Reasons to Pursue a PhD as a Cause of Low Completion Rate of Russian PhD Programs, Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2016, no. 3 (9), pp. 18-20.

4. Godin B. The knowledge economy: Fritz Machlup's construction of a synthetic concept. In: The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2010, pp. 261-290.

5. Realising the European Higher Education Area: Communique of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003, available at: http://www.ehea.info/cid100938/ministerial-conference-berlin-2003.html (accessed 01.03.2017).

6. Pedersen H. S. Empirical Essays on the Labor Market Outcomes of PhD Graduates. Forlaget Politica, 2015. 155 p.

7. Taylor S. E. Changes in doctoral education: Implications for supervisors in developing early career researchers, International Journal for Researcher Development, 2012, no. 3 (2), pp. 118-138.

8. Auriol L., Misu M., and Freeman R. A. Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/04. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013. 61 p.

9. Parada F., Peacock J. The Quality of Doctoral Training and Employability of Doctorate Holders: The Views of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers, available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007 %2F978-3-319-20877-0_38 (accessed 01.03.2017).

10. Shmatko N., Katchanov Yu. Professional Careers and Mobility of Russian Doctorate Holders. In: Gokhberg L., Shmatko N., Auriol L. (eds.), The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers, Springer International Publishing, 2016, available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-27210-8 (accessed 01.03.2017).

11. Kehm B., Teichler U. Doctoral Education and Labor Market: Policy Questions and Data Needs. In: Gokhberg L., Shmatko N., Auriol L. (eds.), The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers, Springer International Publishing, 2016, available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-27210-8 (accessed 01.03.2017).

12. Leao C. P., Ferreira A. C. Talking about mentoring relationships from the perspectives of PhD students: A conceptual model development, available at: http://www. weef2015.eu/Proceedings_WEEF2015/proceedings/papers/ Contribution1428.pdf (accessed 01.03.2017).

13. Yi Meng, Jing Tan, Jing Li. Abusive supervision by academic supervisors and postgraduate research students' creativity: the mediating role of leader-member exchange and intrinsic motivation, International Journal of leadership in education, 15 March 2017, pp. 1-13.

14. Marko R., Danijela M. Relations between Students' Motivation, and Perceptions of the Learning Environment, Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2015, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115-138.

15. Woolston C. Graduate survey: Uncertain futures, Nature, 2015, no. 526 (7574), pp. 597-600.

16. Крючков Ю. Ю., Карпова А. Ю., Карпов Д. А., АбрамовскихА. А. Наука - выбор молодежи?! (по материалам социологического исследования в Национальном исследовательском Томском политехническом университете) // Власть. 2015. Вып. 4. С. 128-139.

17. Резник С. Д. Кто и почему намерен поступать в университетскую. аспирантуру? Уроки мониторинга: подготовкой студентов к обучению в аспирантуре нужно управлять // Alma mater. 2016. Вып. 1. С. 37-44.

18. Груздев И. А., Терентьев Е. А. Аспиранты российских вузов: результаты социологического исследования в 16 университетах РФ [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ioe.hse.ru/data/2017/02/28/1166208288/Аспиранты_презентация.pdf (дата обращения: 01.04.2017).

19. Бедный Б. И., Остапенко Л. А., Серова Т. И. Выпускники аспирантуры естественнонаучного профиля на рынке труда // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2014. № 3. С. 67-73.

20. Mironos A. A., Bednyi B. I., Ostapenko L. A. Employment of PhD program graduates in Russia: a study of the University of Nizhni Novgorod graduates' careers, available at: https://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40064-015-1003-x (accessed 01.03.2017).