The UK experience of research performance assessment: the RAE and its critics
Abstract
Research Assessment Exercises (RAE), introduced in the UK by the Thatcher's government, are widely regarded as the prototype of all subsequent academic neoliberal reforms which took place in the university sector of European countries in 1980-2000s. Attaining greater research and financial efficiency of the academic sector was declared as the main goal of these reforms. Promotion of market-based instruments and emphasis on the open competition inside the university sector were basic policy principles which influenced the design of rAe. The study of RAE practices and consequences reported in this article has been conducted in the framework of a broader project, focusing on the systems of university management and their influence on academic careers. The basic data source of the study were (1) interviews with UK social scientists, who had significant experience of both academic and administrative work, and (2) official documents, produced in the course of RAE campaigns.
About the Author
M. A. Safonova
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (Санкт-Петербург)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Alderman G. We should abolish the RAE altogether // The Guardian. 2007. 6 November [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2007/nov/06/highereducation.researchassessmentexercise (дата обращения: 24.10.2014)
2. Perkin H. J. The academic profession in the United Kingdom // The academic profession: national, disciplinary, and institutional settings / ed. by В. R. Clark. University of California Press, 1987. P. 13-59.
3. RAE 01/2006 (J) RAE 2008: Panel criteria and working methods: Panel J. 83 p. [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2006/01/docs/jall.pdf (дата обращения: 24.10.2014).
4. RAE 03/2004: Units of assessment and recruitment of panel members. 17 p. [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2004/03/ (дата обращения: 04.10.2014).
5. RAE 2008 UOA 41 subject overview report. 8 p. [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/ov/ (дата обращения: 28.10.2014).
6. REF 01.2011: Decisions on assessing research impact. 8 p. [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/decisionsonassessingresearchimpact/01_11. pdf (дата обращения: 23.10.2014).
7. REF 02.2011: Assessment framework and guidance on submissions. 62 p. [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-02/ (дата обращения: 28.10.2014).
8. Sutherland J. Do the RAE judges read all the research submitted? // The Guardians. 2009. 5 March [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.theguardian.com/education/mortar-board/2009/mar/05/rae-research-universities (дата обращения: 28.10.2014).
9. The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems / ed. by R. Whitley, J. Glaser. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. 180 p.
10. Trow M. Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective // Higher Education Policy. 1996. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 309-324
11. Wolff J. The RAE - what would we talk about without it? // The Guardian. 2009. 5 May [Электрон. ресурс]. URL: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2009/may/05/jonathan-wolff-rae (дата обращения: 28.10.2014).
Review
For citations:
Safonova M.A. The UK experience of research performance assessment: the RAE and its critics. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014;(6):69-81. (In Russ.)
Views:
446
Email this article 