Theories of higher education and specialty choice by prospective students: A social-network analysis
Abstract
The article starts with reviewing of major sociological approaches to higher education (education as accumulation of professional capital, education as class distinction, education as age moratorium, etc.). We then derive hypotheses from each of the theories on how the process of choosing between specialties is organized. Each of the models of student choice is then tested against objective data on application to different specialties of a large university using multiple regression and social network analysis. It seems that the model of opportunistic professionalism fits the data best: the prospective students choose their preferred specialty early, probably on the basis of projected financial returns, and prepare for them purposefully for a long period of time. When it proves unavailable, however, they easily shift to less attractive options. Paid education programs serve as inferior goods to the public-funded ones.
About the Authors
M. . Sokolov
Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. . Knorre
Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. . Safonova
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Бурдъе П. Практический смысл. СПб.: Алетейя, 2001.
2. Веблен Т. Теория праздного класса. М. : Прогресс, 1984.
3. Соколов М. М, Волохонский В. Л. Политическая экономия постсоветского вуза // Отеч. зап. 2013. Т. 55, № 4. С. 31-48.
4. Федюкин И. И. Управление спросом и предложением на российском рынке образования // Там же. 2007. Т. 35, № 3. С. 45-53.
5. Эриксон Э. Идентичность: юность и кризис. М.: Прогресс, 1996.
6. Baldi S. Prestige Determinants of First Academic Jobs of New Sociology Ph.D.s, 1983-1992 // The Sociological Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 36, № 4. Р. 777-789.
7. Becker H., Geer B., Hughes E., Strauss A. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1961.
8. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / J. G. Richardson (ed.). N. Y. : Greenwood Press, 1986. Р. 241-258.
9. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-C. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. L. : Sage, 1990.
10. Collins R. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. N. Y. : Academic Press, 1979.
11. Freeman L. C. Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification // Social Networks. 1991. Vol. 1. Р. 215-239.
12. Goffman E. The Interaction Order // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. P. 1-17.
13. Jencks C., Riesman D. The Academic Revolution. Transaction Publishers, 2002.
14. Sorensen A. The Structural Basis of Social Inequality // The American Journal of Sociology. 1995. Vol. 101, № 5. Р. 1333-1365.
15. Spence M. Job Market Signaling // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1973. Vol. 87, № 3. Р. 355-374.
16. StiglitzJ. E. The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 115, №4. Р. 1441-1478.
17. Tremblay K. Academic mobility and immigration // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2005. Vol. 9, № 3. Р. 196-228.
18. Wasserman S., Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press, 1994.
19. Winston G. Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: Awkward Economy of Higher Education // The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1999. Vol. 13, № 1. Р. 13-36.
Review
For citations:
Sokolov M., Knorre A., Safonova M. Theories of higher education and specialty choice by prospective students: A social-network analysis. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014;(2):6-25. (In Russ.)
Views:
475
Email this article 