Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

University activities planning and results monitoring system based on key performance indicators in University

Abstract

At modern volatile times university heads need to work in such a way that would allow "thinking for perspective" using different analysis and prognostication tools. This article is devoted to the description of main principles and planning and control measures sequence as well as activities results control at PSU which is based on key performance indicators. Planning system covers all types of activities and hierarchic level of the university (planning overall university activities, structural unit planning, individual planning for each staff member). Thus allows for motivating staff members towards end results which is directly related to material stimulation and career growth. The right choice of key performance indicator (KPI) is one of the main tasks that lead to good results. This article presents detailed description of main KPIs depending on their source, consequence scope, period of influence on the result, changes options related to the degree of achievability. We see that activities of several departments are mainly evaluated by external environment in the form of ratings and monitoring whereas other departments present KPI which are manly internal. The article contains examples of such departments and their KPIs as well as the roadmap of measures for achieving required KPI level. During the period of PSU activity planning and control system functioning (since 2012) there have been several positive trends (seven out of seven possible efficacy monitoring criteria according to Ministry for Education and Science monitoring). University has also improved its positions in main ratings (39th place in Russian and 5th place in the North western Federal area according to national university rating for 2014/2015). We identified problems that can be encountered, particularly in the field of human factor. The value of this work is related to the fact that it shows PSU experience in creating planning system, KPI choice and university activities control.

About the Authors

A. Voronin
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation


I. Peshkova
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation


O. Zyateva
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Балабанов А. Е., Клюев А. К. Стратегическое планирование развития университета//Университетское управление: практика и анализ. - 2002.- № 2. - С. 19-27.

2. Ерыгина Л. В., Гаврилов В. Ю. Планирование инновационной деятельности вуза: инструменты и методы//Вестник Сибирского государственного аэрокосмического университета им. академика М.Ф. Решетнева. - 2009. - № 1. - С. 110-113.

3. Иванов П. В., Турянская Н. П., Середа М. В., Али-кин В. А. Модели стратегического анализа и управления деятельностью вузов//Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. - 2015. - № 2 (74).

4. Dominguez-Vergara N., Monroy-Anieva М., Domin-guez-Perez A. Higher education in Mexico and comparison of indicators of four public higher education in-stitutions//ICERI2014 Proceedings: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. - 2014. - P. 3433-3439.

5. Дербенева О. Ю., Воронин А. В., Пешкова И. В. Университетский комплекс ПетрГУ в научно-образовательном пространстве Европейского Севера: стратегия инновационного развития//Вузы - региональной экономике. Сборник докладов отчетной научно-практической конференции. Национальный Исследовательский Томский политехнический университет. - 2014. - С. 28-30.

6. Шегельман И. Р., Воронин А. В. Финский опыт управления наукой и инновациями//Глобальный научный потенциал. 2013. № 6 (27). С. 78-80.

7. Панов М. М. Оценка деятельности и система управления компанией на основе KPI. - М.: Инфра-М, 2013.-255 с.

8. Воронин А. В., Васильев В. Н. Стратегическое планирование развития регионального распределенного университетского комплекса//Университетское управление: практика и анализ, № 2. - 2002. - С. 44-52,

9. Воронин А. В. Формирование и реализация инновационного потенциала - инструмент стратегического развития университета//Инновации, 2012. - N11 (169). - С. 72-78.


Review

For citations:


Voronin A., Peshkova I., Zyateva O. University activities planning and results monitoring system based on key performance indicators in University. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2015;(5):8-18. (In Russ.)

Views: 423


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)