The University as an Architect of the Educational and Production Ecosystem
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.003
Abstract
Focusing on Tver State Technical University (TvSTU), the paper analyzes the implementation of an «educational and production ecosystem architect» strategy between 2020 and 2025. The empirical base combines content analysis of 27 educational programs (bachelor’s, master’s, continuing professional education), 16 in-depth interviews with peat industry executives (n = 8), faculty members (n = 6), and research staff (n = 2), alongside surveys of 112 engineering graduates and 42 employers.
Authors identify a paradox: while 91 % of employers express satisfaction with graduates’ fundamental technical training, 68 % report a sharp deficit in managerial and entrepreneurial competencies.
The institutional response involved developing a three-tier management model, restructuring internal regulations, and establishing shared intellectual property mechanisms. Employment in the field of study rose to 82 %, the number of graduate entrepreneurs increased by 37 %, and extra-budgetary revenue grew by 54 %.
The case novelty lies in testing the «ecosystem architect» concept through reorganizing university management mechanisms rather than introducing pedagogical or technological innovations. Intended for researchers and practitioners in university management, the article addresses workforce development challenges in peripheral economies.
About the Authors
S. N. GamayunovTver State Technical University
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Gamayunov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor
Department of Technological Machines and Equipment
170026; 22 Af. Nikitina Embankment; Tver
B. F. Zyuzin
Tver State Technical University
Russian Federation
Boris F. Zyuzin, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department
Department of Technological Machines and Equipment
170026; 22 Af. Nikitina Embankment; Tver
References
1. Rasmussen J., Jensen K.M. Vocational education and training in rural areas. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 2022, vol. 74, nr 4, pp. 589–607. DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2021.1982991 (In Eng.)
2. Lipis D.A., Lipis E.A. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Digital transformation of additional professional education]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo [Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law], 2025, vol. 15, nr 6, pp. 4395–4414. DOI: 10.18334/epp.15.6.123353 (In Russ.)
3. Akberdina V.V., Vasilenko E.V. Universitet kak uchastnik regional’noi innovatsionnoi ekosistemy: tipologiya bazovykh strategii povedeniya [University as a participant of the regional innovation ecosystem: typology of basic behavioral strategies]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2022, vol. 26, nr 2, pp. 9–26. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2022.02.009 (In Russ.)
4. Vyatkina I.V., Khannanova-Fakhrutdinova L.R. Integratsiya obrazovaniya, nauki i proizvodstva: novyi vzglyad na podgotovku kadrov [Integration of education, science and production: a new look at personnel training]. Koncept [Concept], 2024, nr 11, pp. 313–329. DOI: 10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11193 (In Russ.)
5. Popov A.K., Udalov I.D. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie posledstviya razvitiya ekosistem [Socio-economic consequences of ecosystem development]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative Economy], 2022, vol. 16, nr 10, pp. 3727–3750. DOI: 10.18334/ce.16.10.116390 (In Russ.)
6. D’Este P., Di Maria F., Perucci G. Triple Helix interactions and university engagement with SMEs. Technovation, 2022, vol. 118, p. 102532. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102532 (In Eng.)
7. Mantulenko V.V. Perspektivy razvitiya dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya v Rossii [Prospects for the development of additional professional education in Russia]. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek [Continuous Education: XXI Century], 2023, nr 2 (42), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2022.8284 (In Russ.)
8. Kubrushko P.F., Shingareva M.V., Atapina Yu.A. Podgotovka kadrov dlya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa [Training of personnel for the agro-industrial complex]. Agroinzheneriya [Agricultural Engineering], 2022, vol. 24, nr 4, pp. 58–63. DOI: 10.26897/2687-1149-2022-4-58-63 (In Russ.)
9. Tikhomirova N.V. Setevye formy vzaimodeistviya universitetov v usloviyakh tsifrovoi transformatsii [Network forms of university interaction in the context of digital transformation]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2022, vol. 26, nr 3, pp. 50–64. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2022.03.019 (In Russ.)
10. Krause J., Raasch C. Digital twins in education: Conceptual foundations and design principles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, vol. 199, p. 123120. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123120 (In Eng.)
11. Billett S., Pavlova M. Workplace participatory practices and lifelong vocational learning. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 2023, vol. 75, nr 2, pp. 245–263. DOI: 10.1080/13636820.2022.2045341 (In Eng.)
12. Yanchenko E.V. Regional’naya innovatsionnaya ekosistema: otsenka effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Regional innovation ecosystem: assessment of functioning efficiency in the context of digitalization]. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Issues of Innovation Economics], 2023, vol. 13, nr 2, pp. 881–900. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.13.2.117913 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gamayunov S.N., Zyuzin B.F. The University as an Architect of the Educational and Production Ecosystem. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2026;30(1):35-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2026.01.003
JATS XML


























.png)