Potential of professional network communities in project-based learning

This article explores the characteristics and potential of networked professional communities as a specific and increasingly influential actor in university-based project activity. These communities are seen as key contributors to the development of students’ project and entrepreneurial competencies and as unique agents in the construction of a “space of consensus” — a prerequisite for innovation in educational and cross-sector ecosystems. The conceptual framework of the study is grounded in the Triple Helix and Quadruple Helix models, as well as in the theoretical approaches to professional communities and consensus-building environments. The empirical base comprises a qualitative analysis of nine case studies illustrating various formats of collaboration between Russian universities and professional network communities. The cases were selected using criteria aligned with the Quadruple Helix logic and indicators of community agency. The study demonstrates that the central value of network communities lies in their ability to act as mediators between universities and external innovation ecosystems. They foster knowledge exchange by connecting professionals from diverse industries and functional roles, facilitate rapid and informal access to expert and mentoring support, and provide alternative channels for involving students in real-world project and entrepreneurial practices. Based on the case analysis, three models of university–community collaboration are identified:

1. A university-based model, where the space of consensus is built upon previously accumulated trust;
2. A network-integrated model, where the university becomes part of an externally governed structure, formalizing consensus and reducing reliance on trust;

3. A supportive model, in which the university assists its own project teams and communities in engaging with professional networks while gradually building trust capital. The findings suggest that structural differences between universities and network communities often create interaction barriers, but these can be addressed through the intentional transformation of communicative, organizational, infrastructural, and value-context dimensions of cooperation. The study’s originality lies in the conceptualization of networked professional communities as a unique subject and strategic resource in project-based learning. The authors propose a set of institutional measures to support the formation of consensus spaces within university-centered innovation ecosystems. These include the development of digital networking platforms, support for structurally and value-aligned student project teams and communities, and mechanisms to enhance communication and trust-building. This article is intended for researchers of educational innovation, university administrators, program designers in technological entrepreneurship, and representatives of professional communities.

1. Itskovits G. Troinaya spiral’. Universitety predpriyatiya gosudarstvo. Innovatsii v deistvi [Triple Helix. Universities, Enterprises, and Governments. Innovations in Action]. Tomsk, Izd-vo TUSUR, 2010, 238 p. (In Russ.).

2. Carayannis E., Barth T., Campbell D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2011, vol. 412, nr 4, pp. 2286–2302. doi 0000-0001-5556-6616 (In Eng.).

3. Carayannis E., Campbell D. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2012, vol. 1, nr 1, pp. 41–69. doi 10.4018/978-1-4666-0882-5.ch308 (In Eng.).

4. Schraudner M., Wehking S. Fraunhofer’s Discover Markets: Fostering Technology Transfer by Integrating the Layperson’s Perspective. In: Technology Transfer in a Global Economy, New York, Springer, 2012, pp. 367–374. (In Eng.).

5. Smorodinskaya N. V. Setevye innovatsionnye ekosistemy i ikh rol’ v dinamizatsii ekonomicheskogo rosta [Network innovation ecosystems and their role in dynamizing economic growth]. Innovatsii, 2014, vol. 7 (189), pp. 27–33. (In Russ.).

6. Melikyan A. V. Faktory rezul’tativnosti nauchnoissledovatel’skogo sotrudnichestva vuzov i biznesa [Factors of the effectiveness of scientific research cooperation between universities and businesses]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2024, vol. 28, nr 2, pp. 96–110. doi 10.15826/umpa.2024.02.018. (In Russ.).

7. Rossoni A. L., de Vasconcellos E. P. G., de Castilho Rossoni R. L. Barriers and Facilitators of University-Industry Collaboration for Research, Development and Innovation: a Systematic Review. Journal of Management Review Quarterly, 2023, vol. 74 (1), pp. 24–28. doi 10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1. (In Eng.).

8. Lind F., Styhre A., Aaboen L. Exploring universityindustry collaboration in research centers. Journal of Innovative Management, 2013, vol. 16 (1), pp. 70–91. doi 10.1108/14601061311292869. (In Eng.).

9. Ivanova I. A., Karastelev B. Ya., Yakubovskii Yu. V. Model’ troinoi spirali i fraktal’naya struktura innovatsionnoi sistemy v prilozhenii k realizatsii konkretnogo innovatsionnogo proekta [Triple Helix Model and fractal structure of the innovation system in application to the implementation of a specific innovation project]. Vestnik TGEU, 2011, nr 1, pp. 15– 23. (In Russ.).

10. Jin Z., Cui Z., Zhu S., Xu L. Face-to-Face Contact and University-Industry Collaboration: Evidence From Mobile Signaling Data in Beijing. Journal of The Annals of Regional Science, 2024, vol. 72, pp. 1255–1276. doi 10.1007/s00168-023-01242-1 (In Eng.).

11. Secundo G., Elena-Perez S., Martinaitis Z., Leitner K.-H. An Intellectual Capital Framework to Measure Universities’ Third Mission Activities. Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 123, pp. 229–239. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013 (In Eng.).

12. Boronina L. N., Senuk Z. V., Kul’minskaya A. V. i dr. Osnovy proektnoi deyatel’nosti v publichnom upravlenii: uchebnoe posobie [Fundamentals of project activities in public administration: a tutorial]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta, 2025, 160 p. (In Russ.).

13. Mersiyanova I. V., Bryukhno A. S. Tsifrovye volonterskie platformy: gotovnost’ rossiyan i potentsial primeneniya [Digital volunteer platforms: Russians’ readiness and potential for use]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 2020, vol. 6, pp. 357– 375. (In Russ.).

14. Kastel’s M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [The information age: economy, society, and culture]. Moscow: GU VShE, 2000, 608 p. (In Russ.).

15. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized Society]. Moscow, Logos, 2005, 390 p. (In Russ.).

16. Callon M. The dynamics of techno-economic networks // Coombs R., Saviotti P., Walsh V. Technological Change and Company Strategies. Academic Press, 1992, pp. 72–102. (In Eng.).

17. Stark D., Vedres B. Social Times of Network Spaces: Network Sequences and Foreign Investment in Hungary. American Journal of Sociology, 2006, vol. 111, nr 5, pp. 1367– 1411. doi 10.1086/499507. (In Eng.).

18. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Journal of Public Administration, 2003, vol. 6, nr 2, pp. 185–194. doi 10.1017/cbo9780511803932 (In Eng.).

19. Scholcover F., Beadle S., Hancock G. Networking: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly an Interactive Discussion Panel on Networking. Proceedings of the Human Factors andErgonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019, vol. 63, pp. 503. doi 10.1177/1071181319631331. (In Eng.).

20. Teeter C. Professional Networks Within U.S. Higher Education: Avenues to Foster Career and Institutional Success. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2020, vol. 8 (6), pp. 101–110. doi 10.11114/jets.v8i6.4641. (In Eng.).

21. Batygin S., Gradosel’skaya G. V. Setevye vzaimosvyazi v professional’nom soobshchestve sotsiologov: metodika kontentanaliticheskogo issledovaniya biografii [Network connections in the professional community of sociologists: methodology of content-analytical study of biographies]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 2001, nr 1, pp. 88–109. (In Russ.).

22. Donskoi A. G., Sakhno O. A., Makashova V. N. Professional’nye setevye soobshchestva kak resurs neformal’nogo povysheniya kvalifikatsii pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov [Professional network communities as a resource for informal advanced training of teaching staff]. Nauchno-teoreticheskii zhurnal, 2021, iss. 2 (47), pp. 15–25. (In Russ.).

23. Fedotova M. S. Professional’nye soobshchestva kak instrument razvitiya kadrovogo potentsiala territorii [Professional communities as a tool for developing the human resources potential of territories]. Gumanitarnyi nauchnyi vestnik, 2020, nr 9, pp. 100–105. (In Russ.).

24. Mavis M. Community-Based Learning: Practices, Challenges, and Reflections. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 198–202. doi 10.22329/celt.v2i0.3228. (In Eng.).

25. Nugumanova L. N., Shaikhutdinova G. A. Rol’ professional’nykh soobshchestv v razvitii virtual’nogo nastavnichestva v sisteme dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya [The role of professional communities in the development of virtual mentoring in the system of continuing professional education]. Sbornik statei uchastnikov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Collection of articles by participants of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference], Kazan, 2023, pp. 383–387. (In Russ.).

26. Castells M. Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. In: Castells M. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA, Elgar, 2004, pp. 3–49. (In Eng.).

27. Stark D. For a Sociology of Worth. Journal of International Affairs, 2000, vol. 10, pp. 20. doi 10.1108/s0733-558x20170000052011. (In Eng.).

28. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1993, 336 p. (In Eng.).

29. Lave J., Wenger E. Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and Communities of Practice, available at: https://infed.org/ mobi/jean-lave-etienne-wenger-and-communities-of-practice/ (accessed 02.17.2025). (In Eng.).