DIGITALIZATION IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIORITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES: AN EXPERTVIEW

Universities have been formed in the era of communication through the «printed text», and the digital revolution taking place in the world in the last decades creates new opportunities and challenges for them. Digital technologies form a fundamentally new basis for the production, storage and transmission of knowledge; they lead to a profound transformation of all types of communication, content and organization of thinking and activity. In order to manage higher education development in Russia, it is important to understand 1) which place digitalization has among development priorities of universities, 2) whether their strategies produce the leadership in production and use of modern digital technologies or there is a risk that universities will become outsiders in this field. The article presents the results of a large-scale expert survey (1481 experts from 65 universities) on the prospects and priorities of the development of universities in Russia. Key research questions are: 1) which place digitalization takes among other large-scale changes («trends») topical for the modern university; 2) which place «digital challenge» occupies among other challenges? 3) do the actual priorities of Russian universities management reflect the significance of the «digital challenge»? According to the survey, the «total digitalization» of the economy and society will be the key trend in the period until 2035. Consequently, the «digitalization challenge» (the need to move towards the large-scale use of digital technologies in education and university management) will be the most significant one for universities. The experts believe that investment in digital infrastructure should feature prominently in the system of development priorities and have quick impact. However, the survey shows a certain gap between the «due» (according to the experts) and the actual structure of the priorities for the development of Russian universities. The main trend of changes and the challenge for universities is «digitalization», while among the actual priorities of investment in development, «PR and promotion of the university», «cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Science and federal agencies» are at the first positions, and investment in digital infrastructure is only at the third position. Even lower is the actual priority of such important areas of investment as the motivation of teachers and students («investment in activity»); international cooperation; cooperation with business; educational technology of the new generation; attraction of «new students»; attraction of «new personnel»; starting the exploratory research; support for scientific schools. Among the various elements of higher education reform in Russia, the «digitization» of the educational process is viewed by experts as the most promising direction, which is already showing its effectiveness. The survey results show the need for amending the strategic priorities of Russian universities. While maintaining a high priority of investment in digital technologies, it is necessary to raise the priority of investment in human capital, i. e. in «new personnel» (leading scientists, practitioners with unique experience, talented young scientists and teachers, etc.), stimulating the initiative of teachers, staff and students and their involvement in development process.

universities, higher education reforms, digital revolution, digital technology, investment in development

1. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, The World Bank. 2016. 330 p.

2. Устюжанина E. В., Сигарев А. В., Шеин P. A. Цифровая революция и фундаментальные изменения в экономических отношениях // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2017. № 10 (406). Экономические науки. Вып. 58. С. 15-25.

3. Аптекман А., Калабин В., Клинцов В., Кузнецова Е., Кулагин В., Ясеновец И. Цифровая Россия: новая реальность. Digital McKinsey. 2017. 131 с.

4. Collis В., Moonen J. Flexible Learning in a digital world: experiences and expectations. London, New York, Routledge, 2006. 237 p.

5. Trends in Higher Education Marketing, Recruitment, and Technology. Washington, Hanover Research. 2014. 27 p.

6. Неборский E. В. Образование будущего: ключевые педагогические инновации и тенденции в развитии образовательной среды // Интернет-журнал «Науковедение». 2015. Т. 7. № 2. 10 с. DOI: 10.15862/166PVN 215

7. Siemens G., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, Sh. Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Athabasca University, University of Edinburgh, University of Texas Arlington, University of South Australia. 2015. 230 p.

8. Johnson L., Adams Becker S., Cummins M., Estrada V., Freeman A. & Hall C. NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas. The New Media Consortium. 2016. 50 p.

9. Trends Shaping Education 2016. Paris. OECD Publishing. 2016. 115 p., available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/trends_edu2016-en

10. Никулина T. В., Стариченко E. Б. Информатизация и цифровизация образования: понятия, технологии, управление // Педагогическое образование в России. 2018. № 8. С. 107-113.

11. Kim Kyong-Jee and Bonk Curtis J. The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says.., Educause quarterly. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 22-30.

12. Shachar M., Neumann Y. Twenty Years of Research on the Academic Performance Differences Between Traditional and Distance Learning: Summative Meta-Analysis and Trend Examination, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 318-334.

13. Moore J. L., Dickson-Deane C., Galyen K. E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?, Internet and Higher Education. 2011. No. 14. Pp. 129-135.

14. Cheawjindakarn B., Suwannatthachote P., Theeraroungchaisri A. Critical Success Factors for Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature, Creative Education. 2012. Vol. 3. Supplement. Pp. 61-66.

15. Liyanagunawardena T. R., Adams A. A. Williams S.A. MOOC: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research, Open and Distance Learning. 2013. No. 14(3). Pp. 202-227.

16. Онлайн-обучение: как оно меняет структуру образования и экономику университета. Открытая дискуссия Я. И. Кузьминов - М. Карной // Вопросы образования. 2015. № 3. С. 8-43.

17. Семенова Т. В., Вилкова К. А., Щеглова И. А. Рынок массовых открытых онлайн-курсов: перспективы для России // Вопросы образования. 2018. № 2. С. 173-197.

18. Соколов Е. А., Середа С. Н. Информационный сервис электронного документооборота вуза // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2012. № 5. С. 106-125.

19. Hanus M.D., Fox J. Assessing the effects of gamifi-cation in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance, Computers and Education. 2015. No. 80. Pp. 152-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu. 2014.08.019

20. Potkonjak V, Gardner M., Callaghan V, Mattila P., Guetl Ch., Petrovic V.M., Jovanovic K. Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review, Computers & Education. 2016. No. 95. Pp. 309-327.

21. Wen-Hsiung Wu, Yen-Chun Jim Wu, Chun-Yu Chen, Hao-Yun Kao, Che-Hung Lin, Sih-Han Huang. Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis, Computers & Education. 2012. No. 59. Pp. 817-827.

22. Комлева H. В. Профессиональная компетентность личности в условиях smart-общества // Открытое образование. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 27-33.

23. Picciano, A. The Evolution of Big Data and Learning Analytics in American Higher Education, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2012. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 9-20.

24. Университет 20.35. Екатеринбург: Издательские решения, 2017. Т. 34. 50 с. (Серия 05. Russian Fundamental: университет для России).

25. Ефимов В. С., Лаптева А. В., Румянцев М. В., Дадашева В. А., Ефимов А. В. Будущее высшей школы в России: экспертный взгляд. Форсайт-исследование -2030: аналитический доклад / Красноярск: Сибирский федеральный университет. 2012а. 181 с. [Электронный ресурс] Режим доступа: http://foresight.sfu-kras.ru/sites/foresight.sfu-kras.ru/files/_Doklad_Vysshaya_shkola_-_2030_ekspertnyy_vzglyad_2012.pdf

26. Ефимов В. С., Лаптева А. В., Румянцев М. В. Будущее высшей школы России - 2030: социально-экономические контексты и критические ситуации (по результатам Делфи-опроса экспертов) // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 20126. № 2 (78). С. 24-37.