Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

FLAGSHIP UNIVERSITY ROLE IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PRACTICES

https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.03.032

Abstract

The case presented in the article describes the experience of organizing and functioning of initiative groups from Petrozavodsk State University conducting research in the field of public and administrative communication. This experience was accompanied with expert activities and organizing dialogue involving university representatives and public and administrative institutions of the region in the context of tasks determined by the status of pillar university. The aim of the article is to define possible forms of university community influence on forming public agenda in the region in the context of pillar university development asks based on the description of social involvement parameters of university initiative groups created in 2015-2017. Because of obtaining the status of pillar university in 2017 PetSU focused the main vector of university development on solving the tasks of forming innovation infrastructure and organizational design which suggests implementation of renewed mission and strengthening the social role of the university in the region. Alongside with actualization of university interaction with main stakeholders ensuring stable regional development existing practices of university public participation in intersectoral interaction system also play an important role. Many of them result from implementing strategic development program «University complex of PetSU in academic and educational space of European North: innovation development strategy» (2012-2016 гг.). Since 2015 within this program several initiative projects on studying public and administrative interaction in Republic of Kareliya were conducted. Peculiar features of organizing and implementing these projects are analyzed in this article. The results of project activities were used as the basis for forming overall interaction system for initiative groups’ members and external partners, authorities and republic administration, public consulting structures and public organizations. Practical use of experience in organizing interdisciplinary teams and results of initiative projects are reviewed in the discourse of university third mission. The forms of social involvement presented in this case can be used in constructing interaction between pillar university with main actors participating in the process of regional development management. Project materials are analyzed with the help of such methods as event - analysis, comparison, structural and functional analysis in the framework of «case-study» research strategy. Case review is preceded by literature review on the topic of university social role. Original nature of this article is in the analysis of pillar university participation in the system of communication between public and administration. Use of experience allowing for defining social partnership patterns in the process of forming regional agenda demonstrates opportunities which are initially seen in intersectoral dialogue at the local level in the context of solving individual tasks. Multiplication of interaction cases gives cumulative effect which reveals new opportunities of university influence on the state of regional public sphere. Presented information can have practical implementation in renewing forms of social involvement as an integral part of the third mission. Generalization of existing social partnership practices is important for organizing interaction with regional society on a higher level of pillar university development management.

About the Authors

E. I. Chernenkova
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation


V. A. Inozemtseva
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Дербенева О. Ю., Воронин А. В., Пешкова И. В. Результаты реализации программы стратегического развития Петрозаводского государственного университета // Формирование сети опорных региональных университетов Сборник докладов научно-методической конференции. Томск, 2015. С. 34-36. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://conf.regionvuz.ru/node/2354/edit/sbornik_dokladov.pdf.97. (дата обращения 30.03.2018).

2. Molas-Gallart J., Salter A., Pater P., Scott A., Dyran X. Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: University of Sussex, SPRU. 2002. 85 p.

3. Trippl M., Sinozic T., Smith H. L. The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria: European Planning Studies. 2015. vol. 23, no. 9. pp. 1722-1740.

4. Kohoutek J., Pinheiro R., Cabelkova I., Smidova M. Higher Education Institutions in Peripheral Regions: A Literature Review and Framework of Analysis: Higher Education Policy. 2017. vol. 30, no. 4. Pp. 405-423.

5. Pinheiro R., Benneworth P. Regional Roles of Higher Education: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Netherlands: Springer, 2018, pp. 1-8.

6. Koryakina T., Sarrico C. S., Teixeira P. N. Universities’ Third Mission Activities: The Transformation of University Institutional and Organizational Boundaries. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2015, pp. 63-82.

7. Loi M., Di Guardo M. Ch. The third mission of universities: An investigation of the espoused values: Science and Public Policy, 2015, vol. 42, issue 6, pp. 855-870.

8. Мархл М., Паусист А. Методология оценки третьей миссии университетов // Непрерывное образование: XXI век. 2013. № 1. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://lll21.petrsu.ru/journal/article.php?id=1949 (дата обращения 30.03.2018).

9. Universities, Cities and Regions. Loci for Knowledge and Innovation Creation / Edited by Roberta Capello, Agnieszka Olechnicka, Grzegorz Gorzelak - Routledge, Abingdon. 2012. 400 pp.

10. Pinheiro R. et al. The institutionalization of universities’ third mission: introduction to the special issue: European Journal of Higher Education, 2015, vol. 11, issue 3, pp. 227-232.

11. Балмасова Т. А. «Третья миссия « университета -новый вектор развития? // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 8-9 (204). С. 48-55.

12. Зиневич О. В., Балмасова Т. А. «Третья миссия» и социальная вовлеченность университетов: к постановке проблемы // Власть. 2015. № 6. С. 67-72.

13. Перфильева О. В. Университет и регион: на пути к реализации третьей функции // Вестник международных организаций. 2011. № 1(32). C. 133-144.

14. Бородина Л. С., Сулимов К. А., Борисова Н. В. Стратегические ориентиры и миссии современных университетов в зеркале их организационной структуры // Власть. 2016. № 11. С. 60-66.

15. Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2017. № 4. 161 с.

16. Дворецкий С. И., Краснянский М. Н., Молоткова Н. В. Опорный вуз региональной экономики и социальной сферы // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2014. № 3 (131). С. 16-25.

17. Юрьев В. М. Региональный опорный университет как локомотив социальной модернизации // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Проблемы высшего образования. 2015. № 4. С. 10-14.

18. Сунгуров А. Ю. Как возникают политические инновации: «фабрики мысли» и другие институты-медиаторы. Москва, Политическая энциклопедия, 2015. 283 с.

19. Фадеева Л. А., Пунина К. А. Университет в региональной публичной политике: российские практики в сравнительной перспективе // Политическая наука. 2015. № 3. С. 150-161.

20. Аналитические сообщества в публичной политике. Глобальный феномен и российские практики. Москва, РАПН, РОССПЭН, 2012. С. 196-222.

21. Inozemtseva V. Expert communities and the state: Experiences from the Republic of Karelia // Local Politics in a Comparative Perspective. The Cases of Petrozavodsk and Tubingen. / R. Frankenberger, E. Chernenkova [eds.]. Nomos, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2017. PP173-189.

22. Local Politics in a Comparative Perspective. The Cases of Petrozavodsk and Tubingen / R. Frankenberger, E. Chernenkova [eds]. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, 2017. 272 p.

23. Черненкова Е. И., Лаврушина Н. В. Роль «народной дипломатии» в развитии международного межмуниципального сотрудничества // Самоуправление. 2017. № 4. С. 74-78.

24. Иноземцева В. А., Черненкова Е. И. Шестая ежегодная международная конференция «Октябрьские чтения» // Studia Humanitatis Borealis. 2017. № 2. С. 54-59. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://sthb.petrsu.ru/files/pdfs_a4T6sdq42RtE34werSR/journal_5301.pdf. (дата обращения 01.04.2018).


Review

For citations:


Chernenkova E.I., Inozemtseva V.A. FLAGSHIP UNIVERSITY ROLE IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PRACTICES. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2018;22(3):127-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.03.032

Views: 689


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)