EMPLOYMENT FOR UNIVERSITY GRADUATES AND ITS MEASURE THE HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY

The article belongs to the category of cases, and is aimed at investigating the characteristics of graduates’ employment immediately after university as well as attempting to understand how their starting professional trajectories results reflect the higher education quality. The authors emphasize the importance of studying the relationship between labour market and higher education system through feedback mechanisms with university graduates six month later after university in terms of scientific research (identifying the features of graduates’ educational and professional trajectories development) and in terms of practical implications (the effectiveness of investing in high-skilled specialties reproduction, their training and preparation for the regional labour market). The Ural Federal University experience in measuring the educational environment quality (taking into account the research design) allows for comparing the graduate sociological survey outcomes (responses over a wide range of parameters was more than 30 % output of graduates 2017) and university administrative database (the parameters of academic achievements, education levels, educational directions). In addition an overview of the employment indicators and starting salaries of the Alumni Employment Monitoring is presented, which indicates the differentiation of the characteristics of starting professional trajectories by the bachelor’s and master’s educational level of the university graduates of 2014 and 2015. Analysis of these data also shows that UrFU is the largest university in the region for young professionals’ production (10 % of the total graduates’ number in the Urals Federal District). Research results demonstrate contribution to the young specialists training for region needs: 69 % of bachelor’s degree graduates 2017 and 79 % of master’s degree graduates got the job in the region. The case of the Ural Federal University helps to extend he view of the university contribution to the young professionals training quality at different educational levels. Research results show that graduates expect their professional and career trajectories development from investments in higher education, however, master’s degree graduates in starting professional trajectories can count only on the salary premium in the amount of 8 %. The key conclusion of the study is as follows: combining work and study allows graduates to integrate into the labour market more quickly, but those who continue educational trajectories in the masters and post-graduate educational program, more often find a main specialty job. On average 83 % of master’s degree graduates get a job similar to specialization obtained during higher education. To satisfy the needs of the regional labor market in highly qualified specialists and forecast their output, it is necessary to form the value orientations of talented undergraduate students who were able to identify their natural aptitudes to the professional activity in which they were getting a bachelor’s degree in higher education, and consequently involve prospective students into master’s educational programs.

employment, student employment, graduates, young professionals, higher education, regional labour market, educational trajectories, professional trajectories, human capital

1. Benneworth P., Sanderson A. The regional engagement of universities: building capacity in a sparse innovation environment // Higher Education Management and Policy, 2009, vol. 21/1. doi: 10.1787/hemp-v21-art8-en.

2. Чурекова Т. М. Миссия университета в решении региональных проблем [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/699/1/UM-2004-02-09.pdf (дата обращения: 18.06.2018).

3. Панькова Н. М. Миссия университета в современных концепциях высшего университетского образования // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2008. Т. 312. № 6. С. 186-189.

4. Перфильева О. В. Университет и регион: на пути к реализации третьей функции // Вестник международных организаций. 2011. № 1 (32). С. 133-144.

5. Макаркин Н. П., Томилин О. Б. Миссия университета // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2003. № 5-6 (28). С. 9-13.

6. Williford A. M., Moden G. O. Using alumni outcomes research in academic planning. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Baltimore, April 30 - May 3, 1989. 25 p.

7. Australian Graduate Survey (AGS), available at: http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/research/surveys/australiangraduatesurvey/ (accessed: 18.06.2018).

8. Schomburg H., Teichler U. Higher education and graduate employment in Europe: results from graduates surveys in twelve countries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006, vol. 15, 172 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5154-8

9. Allen J., Van der Velden R. Transitions from higher education to work. Careers of university graduates (ed.) U. Teichler. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer: 2007, pp. 55-78.

10. Cabrera A. F., Weerts D. J., Zulick B. J. Making an impact with alumni surveys. Special Issue: Enhancing Alumni Research: European and American Perspectives, 2005, vol. 2005, no. 126, pp. 5-17. doi: 10.1002/ir.144.

11. Student Experience Survey (SES), available at: https://www.qilt.edu.au/about-this-site/student-experience (accessed: 18.06.2018).

12. Weiss F., KleinM., Grauenhorst T. The effects of work experience during higher education on labour market entry: learning by doing or an entry ticket?, Work, employment and society, 2014, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 788-807.

13. Yoshimoto K., Yamada H. University education and its relevance to working life. Competences, Higher Education and Career in Japan and the Netherlands (eds.) J. Allen et.al. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2007, pp. 97-127. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6044-1_5

14. Delaney A. M. Voices of experience: renewing higher education with alumni studies // Tertiary Education and Management, 2000, no. 6, pp. 137-156.

15. Delaney A. M. Ideas to enhance higher education’s impact on graduates’ lives: alumni recommendations // Tertiary Education and Management, 2004, no. 10, pp. 89-105.

16. Мониторинг выпускников Высшей школы экономики [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://cim.hse.ru/alumni (дата обращения: 15.03.2017).

17. Рощин С. Ю., Рудаков В. Н. Влияние «качества» вуза на заработную плату выпускников. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2015. 30 с.

18. Опрос выпускников Новосибирского национального исследовательского государственного университета [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.nsu.ru/4fba62775323994779972e21f7cf667f (дата обращения: 15.03.2017).

19. Мониторинг трудоустройства выпускников [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://graduate.edu.ru/ (дата обращения: 13.06.2018).

20. Фрумин И. Д., Добрякова М. С. Что заставляет меняться российские вузы: договор о невовлеченности // Вопросы образования. 2012. № 2. С. 159-191. doi: 10.173 23/1814-9545-2012-2-159-191.

21. Меренков А. В., Шаврин В. С. Какой специалист востребован на рынке труда: мнение работодателей и студентов // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2015. № 1. C. 94-103.

22. Павлова О. Н., Казин Ф. А., Бутаков Н. А. Профильность трудоустройства выпускников вузов: анализ данных социальных сетей // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2017. Т. 21. № 3 (109). С. 38-56. doi: 10.15826/umpa.2017.03.036