Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

The Characteristics of the University Admission System and Their Infl uence on the Accessibility of Higher Education

https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.04.035

Abstract

The study provides a review of the admission to universities models in different countries and also a comparative analysis of the educational systems characteristics from an international perspective. The aim of the research is to assess the possible impact of the educational system characteristics on the accessibility of higher education. There is also proposed an analytical model which explains how the level of autonomy and selectivity of the educational system, along with the characteristics of the student financial support influence the level of accessibility of higher education. The framework of the model is supported by the cases of selected groups of countries: post-Soviet countries, the USA and the UK, Scandinavian countries and Western European countries. Based on the classification of higher education systems, countries with the highest level of access to higher education tend to have low levels of autonomy and selectivity, or they also can be characterized by highly developed system of financial support. As a result, it was found that high selectivity and autonomy level can negatively influence the accessibility of higher education, while high level of the financial support system may neutralize this effect and positively influence on the access to higher education. Results of the study can be useful while reforming the selection system in Russia, since comparative analysis shows which tools make it possible to increase the accessibility of higher education and, as a result, to reduce educational inequality among different social groups.

About the Authors

P. O. Bugakova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Polina O. Bugakova – intern researcher, Center for Institutional Studies

4 Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000



I. A. Prakhov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Ilya A. Prakhov – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Center for Institutional Studies

4 Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000



References

1. Moscarini G. Job matching and the wage distribution. Econometrica, 2009, vol. 73, nr. 2, pp. 481–516. (In Eng.).

2. Sweetland S. R. Human capital theory: Foundations of a field of inquiry. Review of educational research, 1996, vol. 66, nr. 3, pp. 341–359. (In Eng.).

3. McMahon W. W. The total return to higher education: Is there underinvestment for economic growth and development? The quarterly review of economics and finance, 2018, vol. 70, pp. 90–111. (In Eng.).

4. Bugakova P., Prakhov I. Regional Accessibility of Higher Education in Russia. NRU Higher School of Economics. Series EDU “Education”. 2020, vol. 58. 33 p. (In Eng.).

5. Boarini R., Martins J. O., Strauss H., de la Maisonneuve C., Nicoletti G. Investment in Tertiary Education: Main Determinants and Implications for Policy. CESifo Economic Studies, 2008, vol. 54, nr. 2, pp. 277–312. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifn017 (In Eng.).

6. Prakhov I. The Accessibility of Higher Education in Russia: Sources and Mechanisms of Inequality. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2021, vol. 1, nr. 26, pp. 21–22. (In Eng.).

7. Karabel J., Astin A. W. Social class, academic ability, and college “quality”. Social Forces, 1975, vol. 53, nr. 3, pp. 381–398. (In Eng.).

8. Davies S., Guppy N. Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education. Social Forces, 1997, vol. 75, nr. 4, pp. 1417–1438. DOI: 10.1093/sf/75.4.1417 (In Eng.).

9. Holland M. M., Ford K. S. Legitimating Prestige through Diversity: How Higher Education Institutions Represent Ethno-Racial Diversity across Levels of Selectivity. The Journal of Higher Education, 2021, vol. 92, nr. 1, pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2020.1740532 (In Eng.).

10. Triventi M. Higher education regimes: an empirical classification of higher education systems and its relationship with student accessibility. Quality & Quantity, 2013, vol. 48, nr. 3, pp. 1685–1703. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9868-7 (In Eng.).

11. Curtis S., Klapper R. Financial support systems: the student experience in England and France. International Journal of Social Economics, 2005, vol. 32, nr. ½, pp. 121–132. DOI: 10.1108/03068290510575676 (In Eng.).

12. Prakhov I. A., Andrushchak G. V. Kharakteristi ki obrazovatel’nykh kreditov i ikh vliyaniye na spros na obrazovatel’noye kreditovaniye v Rossii [Characteristics of the educational credits and their influence on the demand of the educational credits in Russia]. X Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva: V 3 kn. Moscow, Izdatel’skiy dom GU-VSHE, 2010. Kn. 1, pp. 526–537. (In Russ.).

13. Postupleniye v vuzy v postsovetskikh stranakh: ekzameny kak instrument resheniya gosudarstvennykh zadach [Entering higher education institutes in Post-Soviet countries: exams as an instrument of the addressing public goals]. Sost. i nauch. red. V. A. Bolotov, R. V. Gorbovskiy; Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2020. 168 p. (In Russ.).

14. Bugakova P. Admission Systems in Post Soviet Countries: a Shared Past, Common Problems, Different Solution. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2021, vol. 1, nr. 26, pp. 6–7. (In Eng.).

15. Korbut A. M. Sistema obrazovaniya Azerbaydzhana [Azerbaijan’s educational system]. Analiticheskiy obzor mezhdunarodnykh tendentsiy razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya [Analytical Review of International Trends in Higher Education], 2004, vol. 7. URL: http://charko.narod.ru/tekst/an7/1.html (accessed: 03.09.2020). (In Russ.).

16. Sputnik (2020). URL: https://ru.sputnik.kg/society/20200803/1049206113/kyrgyzstanminobrnaukipostuplenie-tur.html (accessed 03.09.2020). (In Russ.).

17. Rossiyskaya ga zet a (2019). URL: ht t ps://rg.ru/2019/03/27/ezhegodno-tysiachi-vypusknikoviz-kirgizii-postupaiut-v-vuzy-rossii.html (accessed 03.09.2020). (In Russ.).

18. Radio Ozodi (2020). URL: https://rus.ozodi.org/a/30810102.html (accessed 03.09.2020). (In Russ.).

19. Rezul’taty Obshcherespublikanskogo testirovaniya i zachisleniya na grantovyye i kontraktnyye vuzov Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki v 2019 godu [Results of the Educational Assessment and of the enrolment in grant and commercial places in Kyrgyzstan]. URL: http://www.testing.kg/media/uploads/files/ORT_Report_2019_Russ.pdf (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Russ.).

20. Shardyko Z. V. Instumenty otbora studentov na obucheniye v britanskikh universitetakh [Instruments of the selection process of students in Great Britain’s universities]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnyye i obshchestvennyye nauki [St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences], 2014, vol. 2 (196), pp. 110–117. (In Russ.).

21. Schwartz S. Fair admissions to higher education: recommendations for good practice. London, Higher Education Steering Group, 2004. 90 p. (In Eng.).

22. QS World University Ranking (2020). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/worlduniversity-rankings/2020 (accessed 01.09.2020). (In Eng.).

23. Prakhov I. A. Obzor osnovnykh modeley perekhod «shkola – vuz» v zapadnoyevropeyskikh stranakh i SSHA [Review of the main models of the “scoohl-HEI” move in Western European countries and USA]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Issues], 2009, vol. 2, pp. 108–120. (In Russ.).

24. Evans B. J. College admission testing in America. International perspectives in higher education admission policy: A reader. New York: Peter Lang. 2015. URL: https://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Draft%20of%20College%20Testing%20in%20America.pdf (accessed: 02.09.2020). (In Eng.).

25. Zapryagayev S. A. Sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya Rossii i SSHA [Systems of higher education in Russia and USA]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Journal of Voronezh State University], 2001, nr. 1, pp. 39–47. (In Russ.).

26. Zimdars A. M. Meritocracy and the university: Selective admission in England and the United States. London, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. 256 p. (In Eng.).

27. Khuusko K., Korepanova A. A. Obrazovaniye v Finlyandii [Education in Finland]. Innovatsionnyye proyekty i programmy v obrazovanii [Innovational Projects and Programs in Education], 2010, nr 5, pp. 10–17. (In Russ.).

28. Antyushina N. M. Finlyandiya – mirovoy lider sistemy obrazovaniya [Finland is a world leader of the educational system]. Sovremennaya Yevropa [Modern Europe], 2013, nr 4, pp. 46–53. (In Russ.).

29. Pchelintsev V. S. Gosudarstvennaya politika v oblasti vysshego obrazovaniya v Finlyandii: prioritety i mekhanizmy regulirovaniya [Public policy in the sphere of higher education in Finland: priorities and regulation mechanisms]. Aktual’nyye problemy Yevropy [European Actual Problems], 2013, nr 2, pp. 83–113. (In Russ.).

30. Vakhshtayn V. S. Sistema vysshego obrazovaniya v Norvegii [Higher education system in Norway]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Herald of the Russian Academy of Science], 2007, nr 77 (4), pp. 359–364. (In Russ.).

31. NC-Tabelle für Studiengänge mit dem Abschlussziel Bachelor oder Staatsexamen (2020). URL: https://www.fuberlin.de/studium/docs/DOC/ncliste_staatsexamen_und_monobachelor.pdf, (accessed 03.09.2020). (In Germ.).

32. Gluzman A. Osobennosti sovremennogo obrazovaniya za rubezhom (Angliya, Bel’giya, Frantsiya, SSHA, Izrail’) [Features of the modern education abroad (England, Belgium, France, USA, Israel]. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomor’ya [Culture of People of the Black Sea Region], 2005, nr 58, pp. 8–11. (In Russ.).

33. Kraysman N. V., Fushel’ D. D. Sistema vysshego obrazovaniya vo Frantsii: slabyye storony, paradoksy i zadachi universitetov [Higher education system in France: weaknesses, paradoxes and tasks of the universities]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education], 2015, nr (2–2), pp. 373–373. (In Russ.).

34. Sviridonova V. P., Azzaui M. Sistema vysshego obrazovaniya vo Frantsii [Higher education system in France]. Artium Magistr [Artium Magister], 2005, nr 8, pp. 61–66. (In Russ.).

35. Studying in Germany, URL: https://www.studying-ingermany.org/german-abitur/ (accessed 02.09.2020). (In Eng.).

36. Freie Universitat Berlin. URL: https://www.fuberlin.de/en/studium/information_a-z/ncmerkblatt/index.html (accessed 03.09.2020). (In Germ.).

37. Kübler, D. University admission practices – Germany (2012). MiP Country Profile, 2. (In Eng.).

38. Kredit na obrazovaniye s gospodderzhkoy [Educational credit with governmental support]. URL: https://www.sberbank.ru/ru/person/credits/money/credit_na_obrazovanie (accessed 22.11.2021). (In Russ.).

39. Sotsial’nyy lift [Upward mobility]. URL: https://ba.hse.ru/socialscholarship/ (accessed 22.11.2021). (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Bugakova P.O., Prakhov I.A. The Characteristics of the University Admission System and Their Infl uence on the Accessibility of Higher Education. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(4):37-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.04.035

Views: 1990


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)