Higher education resources: sustaining the students enrollment
Abstract
Issues of better access to higher education in various countries fit specific consistent patterns progressively as desired results are achieved. Our study shows successive stages of change in public demand for higher education and confirms justified consequences of transition to decisive actions pertaining to optimization of educational, material and technical, financial and intellectual resources.
Keywords
спрос на высшее образование,
прием студентов,
платное обучение,
формы обучения,
экономический потенциал регионов,
платежеспособность населения,
demand for higher education,
student enrollment,
tuition-paying education,
modes of study,
industrial capacity of regions,
financial solvency of population
About the Author
L. M. Filatova
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Абанкина И. Тенденции общественного спроса на образование в России // Федеральный справочник. Образование в России. Т. 9. М.: Издательский центр «Президент», 2013. С. 69-77.
2. Абанкина И., Абанкина Т., Филатова Л., Николаенко Е. Тенденции изменения общественного спроса на высшее образование в современной России // Вопросы образования. 2012. № 3. С. 88-112.
3. Корицкий А. В. Человеческий капитал как фактор экономического роста регионов России. Новосибирск: Сибирский университет потребительской кооперации, 2010.
4. Платное обслуживание населения в России: 2013: стат. сб. M.: Росстат, 2013.
5. Российский статистический ежегодник: 2013: стат. сб. M.: Росстат, 2013.
6. Abankina I., Abankina Т., Filatova L., Nikolayenko E. Education Development Trends in Russia // Journal of US-China Public Administration. 2012. Vol. 9. № 10. P. 1198-1214.
7. Berger M., Kostal T. Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education // Economics of Education Review. 2002. № 21. P. 101-110.
8. Bruckmeier K., Wigger B. U. The effects of tuition fees on transition from high school to university in Germany // Economics of Education Review. 2014. № 41. P. 14-23.
9. Caner A., Okten C. Higher education in Turkey: Subsidizing the rich or the poor? // Economics of Education Review. 2013. № 35. P. 75-92.
10. HubnerM. Do tuition fees affect enrolment behavior? Evidence from a 'natural experiment' in Germany // Economics of Education Review. 2012. № 31. P. 949-960.
11. Impact of the economic crisis on European universities. European University Association, January 2011 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.eua.be/Libraries/ NewsletteivEconomc_monitoringJanuary2011final.sflb.ashx (дата обращения: 22.07.2014).
12. Partanen A. What Americans keep ignoring about Finland's school success. From The Atlantic Mobile, December 29, 2011 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://m.theatlantic. com/national/archive/2011/12/what-americans-keep-ignoring-about-finlands-school-success/250564/ (дата обращения: 07.07.2014).
13. Peters M., Murphy P., Marginson S. Creativity and the global knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.
14. Rozada M. G., Menendez A. Public University in Argentina: subsidizing the rich? // Economics of Education Review. 2002. № 21. P. 341-351.
15. Sahlberg P. Finnish Lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 2011.
16. Wolff E., Baumol W., Saini A. A comparative analysis of education costs and outcomes: The United States vs. other OECD countries // Economics of Education Review. 2014. № 39. P. 1-21.
Review
For citations:
Filatova L.M. Higher education resources: sustaining the students enrollment. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2014;(4-5):66-76. (In Russ.)
Views:
432
Email this article 