Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

The managed printing activity of universities: unde venis et quo vadis?

https://doi.org/10.15826/umj.2016.105.044

Abstract

International processes in academic informational space require not only a total increase of teaching and academic staff activities but the Institute right understanding of lagging behind international trends. The aim of this research article is to evaluate researchers' intellectual basis using the analysis of key words from almost 30000 publications by authors from two Russian universities during the period from 2010 till 2015. One of the universities participates in 5-100 Project and the other is a pillar regional university. The research identified several patterns based on frequency and character of key words use and singled out problems hindering the access of Russian authors to international discussion platforms. Authors conducted analysis of dependencies of publication activities in economically developed countries including Russia. They have identified dependence of this indicator and GDP indicator. It should be mentioned that Russian researchers have on average 4,5 times less publication compared to other countries under comparison. This demonstrates objective growth reserve. Authors do not claim full coverage of all factors hindering the management of dynamic development of publication activities at universities. At the same time the article formulates the main strategic and tactical managerial measures facilitating this process, such as: turning research basis towards international academic thinking mainstream; eliminating discrepancies in academic research management; using advantages of a between university branch specialization and publications of its researchers; stronger individualization of universities; transition from general topics to specialized ones; creation of publication service, etc. It is of interest for academic managers as allows for making conclusion concerning present state of affairs as well as for researchers and teams willing to take an active part in forming relevant academic list of topics.

About the Author

V. V. Gamukin
Tyumen state university
Russian Federation


References

1. Беккер Е. Г. Эволюция подходов к количественному анализу научных публикаций // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2015. № 10-2. С. 1153-1160.

2. Галявиева М. С. Altmetrics и библиотеки: тенденции, возможности и проблемы // Вестн. Казан. гос. ун-та культуры и искусств. 2013. № 4. С. 27-32.

3. Мазов Н. А., Гуреев В. Н. Альтернативные подходы к оценке научных результатов // Вестн. Рос. академии наук. 2015. T. 85, № 2. C. 115-122.

4. Акоев М. А., Маркусова В. А., Москалева О. В., Писляков В. В. Руководство по наукометрии: индикаторы развития науки и технологии / под. ред. М. А. Акоева. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2014. 250 с.

5. Гуськов А. Е. Российская наукометрия: обзор исследований // Библиосфера. 2015. № 3. С. 75-86.

6. Ciminia G., Zaccariab A., Gabrielli A. Investigating the interplay between fundamentals of national research systems: Performance, investments and international collaborations // Journal of Informetncs. 2016. № 10. Р. 200-211.

7. Saarela M., Karkkainen T., Lahtonen T., Rossi T. Expert-based versus citationbased ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels // Journal of Informetrics. 2016. № 10. Р. 693-718.

8. Бусыгина Т. В. Альтметрия как комплекс новых инструментов для оценки продуктов научной деятельности // Идеи и идеалы. 2016. Т. 2, № 2 (28). С. 79-87.

9. Саблин К. С. Сравнительная характеристика расходов на НИОКР в регионах Сибири и административно-территориальных единицах зарубежных стран // Journal of Economic Regulation (Вопросы регулирования экономики). 2014. Т. 5, № 3. С. 74-88.

10. Лаврик О. Л., Глухов В. А. Публикационная активность автора в РИНЦ: количественные данные как основа для качественного анализа // Труды ГПНТБ СО РАН. 2015. № 9. С. 134-146.

11. Слащева Н. А., Помельникова Н. А. Опыт работы с ресурсом Elibrary.ru в Библиотеке по естественным наукам РАН // Науч.- техн. информация. Серия 1: Организация и методика информационной работы. 2016. № 4. С. 26-28.

12. Гринь А. М., Лычагин М. В., Лычагин А. М., Попов И. Ю. Высшее образование и исследовательские институты: новые количественные методы // Университет. управление: практика и анализ. 2015. № 2. С. 35-46.


Review

For citations:


Gamukin V.V. The managed printing activity of universities: unde venis et quo vadis? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2016;(5):60-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umj.2016.105.044

Views: 517


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)