Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND THE PARADIGM TRANSFORMATION OF THE GOVERNMENT POLICY ON LIFELONG PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.05.050

Abstract

This conceptual article is based on the statistical data analysis of the changes in mid- and long-term needs and in the scope of personnel training within various systems of lifelong professional education. These data are used to hypothesize the potential direction of the development of this educational system in Russia and the conceptual priorities of the state policies in the area of professional education. The trends related to structural changes in lifelong professional education have never been systematically analyzed in Russia. Foreign statistics shows that such trends have first appeared in other developed countries. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to draw government officials’ and heads of professional educational institutions’ attention to the importance of restructuring the strategic goals of the educational system development, to identify the problem domain of working out the strategies for educational institutions and for the development of the professional education sphere. This purpose is achieved through the analysis of the macroeconomic parameters showing the need in personnel trained within professional educational programmes of various levels and through comparing the identified trends to those in other countries. The results show that the need for training personnel through the system of vocational professional education is much higher than that for training within traditional programmes of professional and higher education. The reason is the intensification of the technological progress and the objective incapability of the traditional educational programmes to provide specialists with competences required by the rapidly changing demands. As a result, the government and employers have to reconsider the priorities of professional education development and the ways to stimulate it. Still, there can be some limitations driven by weakly institutionalized system of interaction within the education management system, among employers and educational institutions.

About the Authors

A. V. Fedotov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Politechnic University
Russian Federation


S. A. Belyakov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation


T. L. Klyachko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation


References

1. OECD (2018), Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en (accessed 10.10.2018).

2. Отражение потребности в ДПО в государственных программах Российской Федерации - проблемы и коллизии // Сб. Дополнительное профессиональное образование: от спроса до признания. М.: Изд-во унив. Губкина, 2017. С. 6-8.

3. Федотов А. В., Беляков С. А. , Клячко Т. Л., Полушкина Е. А. Кадровое обеспечение приоритетных направлений социально-экономического развития: состояние и проблемы // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2017. № 21 (3). С. 27-37.

4. Аналитический доклад о реализации дополнительных профессиональных программ в Российской Федерации за 2014 год [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://as-dpe.mon.gov.ru/files/contentfile/2/analit-doklad-2014.pdf (дата обращения: 15.04.2017).

5. Аналитический доклад о реализации дополнительных профессиональных программ в Российской Федерации за 2015 год [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://as-dpe.mon.gov.ru/files/contentfile/2/analit-doklad-2015.pdf (дата обращения: 20.05.2017).

6. Статистические данные [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://минобрнауки.рф/министерство/статистика (дата обращения: 15.04.2018).

7. Прогноз социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на 2017 год и на плановый период 2018 и 2019 годов [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/macro/20162411012017 (дата обращения: 25.10.2018).

8. Прогноз долгосрочного социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года (разработан Минэкономразвития России). 2013 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://government.ru/media/files/41d457592e04b76338b7.pdf (дата обращения: 06.09.2016).

9. Федотов А. В., Васецкая Н. О. Оценка Макроэкономической эффективности научных исследований в России // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2013. № 3. C. 61-67.

10. Васецкая Н. О., Федотов А. В. Управление трансформацией научных результатов как механизм повышения эффективности научных исследований // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2015. № 1. C. 28-39.

11. Труд и занятость в России Росстат, 2017 [Электронный ресурс]. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/ doc_2017/trud_2017.pdf (дата обращения: 10.10.2018).


Review

For citations:


Fedotov A.V., Belyakov S.A., Klyachko T.L. STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND THE PARADIGM TRANSFORMATION OF THE GOVERNMENT POLICY ON LIFELONG PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2018;22(5):67-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.05.050

Views: 672


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)