Universities’ Readiness for Digital Transformation: a Managerial Aspect
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2024.03.022
Abstract
This article presents a research-oriented investigation. It conducts a theoretical analysis of 307 works dedicated to assessing organizations’ readiness for digital transformation processes. In a context where universities are undergoing digital transformations and facing challenges in achieving targeted performance indicators, the search for underlying causes of these failures becomes increasingly relevant. This study aims to deepen the understanding of universities’ digital readiness by framing the managerial problem through the lens of theoretical analysis informed by empirical
research outcomes in this domain. The methodologies employed include a systematic literature review, expert evaluation, and content analysis. The foundation of this work lies in the search, identifi cation, selection, and critical appraisal of publications by both domestic and international authors addressing the transformation of organizational activities, including those of universities, under the infl uence of digital technologies and tools.
The scientific novelty of this article resides in the novel interpretation of empirical data extracted from published studies on this issue.
A qualitative synthesis of these findings and expert extraction of knowledge from the conducted research have substantiated the necessity of distinguishing between the concepts of “digital maturity” and “digital readiness”. Furthermore, this study delineates a comprehensive set of organizational conditions essential for the successful implementation of digital transformation initiatives within universities and assesses their impact on the outcomes of such processes. It concludes that the development of an institution’s IT infrastructure, traditionally regarded as a primary determinant of successful transformations, is no longer a sufficient condition in today’s context.
About the Authors
L. E. EgorovaRussian Federation
Liliya E. Egorova, PhD (Pedagogical Sciences), Vice-Rector for Development and Digitalization
620100; 37 Siberian Highway; Ekaterinburg
D. G. Sandler
Russian Federation
Daniil G. Sandler, Dr. hab. (Economics), First Vice-Rector for Economics and Strategic Development
620002; 19 Mira str.; Ekaterinburg
References
1. Moore S. How to Measure Digital Transformation Progress, available at: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/how-to-measure-digital-transformation-progress (accessed 15. 12. 2023). (In Eng.).
2. Gebauer H., Arzt A., Kohtamäki M., Lamprecht C., Parida V., Witell L., Wortmann F. How to Convert Digital Offerings into Revenue Enhancement–Conceptualizing Business Model Dynamics Through Explorative Case Studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, vol. 91, pp. 429–441. doi 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.006. (In Eng.).
3. Dieffenbacher S. F. What is Digital Maturity, How to Measure, Tools & Models, available at: https://digitalleadership.com/blog/digital-maturity/ (accessed 15. 12. 2023). (In Eng.).
4. Verma P., Kumar V., Yalcin H., Daim T. Organizational Architecture of Strategic Entrepreneurial Firms for Digital Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Technology in Society, 2023, vol. 75. doi 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102355. (In Eng.).
5. The Business Landscape for Digital Transformation. Hitachi and Forbes Insights Global Research, available at: https://www.osp.ru/netcat_files/18/10/BizLandscape_for_DT_Forbes_IN_SHARE_Forbs_survey_results.pdf (accessed 13. 10. 2023). (In Eng.).
6. Tuukkanen V., Wolgsjö E., Rusu L. Cultural Values in Digital Transformation in a Small Company. Procedia Computer Science, 2022, vol. 196, pp. 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.066. (In Eng.).
7. Singh U. S., Singh N., Gulati K., Bhasin N. K., Kumar H., Sreejith P. M. A Study on the Revolution of Consumer Relationships as a Combination of Human Interactions and Digital Transformations. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, vol. 51, pp. 460–464. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.578. (In Eng.).
8. Xia Y., Liu X., Wang X., Deng H., Han Ch., Liu Z., Tsai S.-B. The Power of Role Models in a Team: The Impact of Lead Entrepreneur’s Digital Leadership on Digital Entrepreneurial Success. Information Processing & Management, 2023, vol. 60, iss. 6. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103498. (In Eng.).
9. Mirza S. S., Miao Y., Corbet Sh., Scrimgeour F., Goodell J. W. Benefits of Top Management Team Education for Corporate Digital Transformation: A Critical Mass Perspective from China. Finance Research Letters, 2024, vol. 61. doi 10.1016/j.frl.2024.104976. (In Eng.).
10. Chwiłkowska-Kubala А., Cyfert S., Malewska K., Mierzejewska K., Szumowski W. The Impact of Resources on Digital Transformation in Energy Sector Companies. The Role of Readiness for Digital Transformation. Technology in Society, 2023, vol. 74. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102315. (In Eng.).
11. Dewi F., Er M. Business Process Maturity Level of MSMEs in East Java, Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 2019, vol. 161, pp. 1098–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.221. (In Eng.).
12. Kiikova E. V., Kiikova D. A. Opyt provedeniya otsenki gotovnosti personala k tsifrovoi transformatsii predpriyatiya [Experience in Assessing the Readiness of Personnel for the Digital Transformation of the Enterprise]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 250–254. doi 10.17513/snt.38919. (In Russ.).
13. Borisov S. A., Zhogin A. O. Formirovanie tsifrovykh kompetentsii sotrudnikov kak element povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti firmy [Formation of Digital Competencies of Employees as the Element of Increasing the Competitiveness of the Company]. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava, 2022, vol. 4–2, pp. 148–154. doi: 10.17513/vaael.2150. (In Russ.).
14. Antonova N. V., Krainova E. A. Gotovnost’ sotrudnikov k tsifrovoi transformatsii organizatsii: rol’ zhiznestoikosti, udovletvorennosti rabotoi i prinyatiya tekhnologii [Readiness of Employers for Digital Transformation of the Organization: the Role of Resilience, Job Satisfaction and Technology Adoption]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya truda i organizatsii, 2023, vol. 8, nr 4 (32), pp. 127–148. doi: 10.38098/ipran.sep_2023_31_3_06. (In Russ.).
15. Errida A., Lotfi B., Chatibi Z. Development of an Assessment Model of Organizational Change Readiness by using Fuzzy Logic. Procedia Computer Science, 2023, vol. 219, pp. 1909–1919. doi 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.490. (In Eng.).
16. Ullrich A., Reißig M., Niehoff S., Beier G. Employee Involvement and Participation in Digital Transformation: a Combined Analysis of Literature and Practitioners’ Expertise. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2023, vol. 36, iss. 8, pp. 29–48. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-10-2022-0302. (In Eng.).
17. Zareie M., Attig N., El Ghoul S., Fooladi I. Firm Digital Transformation and Corporate Performance: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Capital. Finance Research Letters, 2023, vol. 61. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105032. (In Eng.).
18. Hanelt A., Bohnsack R., Marz D., Antunes C. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 58 (5), pp. 1159–1197. doi 10.1111/joms.12639. (In Eng.).
19. Hund A., Wagner H.-T., Beimborn D., Weitzel T. Digital Innovation : Review and Novel Perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information, 2021, vol. 30 (4). doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695. (In Eng.).
20. Li F., Nucciarelli A., Roden, S., Graham G. How Smart Cities Transform Operations Models: a New Research Agenda for Operations Management in the Digital Economy. Production Planning & Control, 2016, vol. 27 (6). P. 514–528. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1147096. (In Eng.).
21. Loebbecke C., Picot A. Reflections on Societal and Business Model Transformation Arising from Digitization and Big Data Analytics: A Research Agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2015, vol. 24 (3), pp. 149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002. (In Eng.).
22. Zhang J., Liu X. Evaluation of Network Service Model Based on Network Convergence. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018, nr 1. doi: 10.1186/s13638-018-1053-1. (In Eng.).
23. Carolis A., de Macchi M., Negri E., Terzi S. A Maturity Model for Assessing the Digital Readiness of Manufacturing Companies. In: Lödding H., Riedel R., Thoben K. D., Cieminski G., von Kiritsis D. IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. APMS2017: Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 513. P. 13–20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2. (In Eng.).
24. Popov E. V., Simonova V. L., Cherepanov V. V. Urovni tsifrovoi zrelosti promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Levels of Digital Maturity of an Industrial Enterprise]. Journal of New Economy, 2021, vol. 22, nr 2, pp. 88–109. doi: 10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-2-5. (In Russ.).
25. Benbasat I., Dexter A. S., Drury D. H., Goldstein R. C. A Critique of the Stage Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Communications of the ACM, 1984, vol. 27, iss. 5, pp. 476–485. (In Eng.).
26. Paulk M. C. A History of the Capability Maturity Model for Software, available at: https://www.researchgate.net /publicat ion /229023237_ A _ Histor y _of_the_Capability_Maturity_ModelR_for_Software (accessed 15. 01. 2024). (In Eng.).
27. Huffman J., Whitman L. E. Developing a Capability Maturity Model for Enterprise Intelligence. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2011, vol. 44, iss. 1, pp. 13086–13091. doi: 10.3182/20110828–6-IT-1002.02641. (In Eng.).
28. Kerrigan M. A Capability Maturity Model for Digital Investigations. Digital Investigation, 2013, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 19–33. doi: 10.1016/j.diin.2013.02.005. (In Eng.).
29. Butzer S, Schötz S., Steinhilper R. Remanufacturing Process Capability Maturity Model. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 715–722. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.092. (In Eng.).
30. von Leipziga T., Gampa M., Manza D., Schöttlea K., Ohlhausena P., Oosthuizenb G., Palma D., von Leipzig K. Initializing Customer-Orientated Digital Transformation in Enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.066. (In Eng.).
31. Lichtblau K., Stich V., Bertenrath R., Blum M., Bleider M., Millack A., Schmitt K., Schmitz E., Schröter M. Industrie 4.0-Readiness. Frankfurt, German: Impuls-Stiftung. 78 p. (In Eng.).
32. Weber C., Königsberger J., Kassner L., Mitschang B. M2DDM – A Maturity Model for Datadriven Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2017, vol. 63, pp. 173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.309. (In Eng.).
33. Dobrolyubova E. I. Otsenka tsifrovoi zrelosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Assessment of the Digital Maturity of Public Administration]. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo, 2021, vol. 2, pp. 37–52. doi: 10.52605/16059921_2021_02_37. (In Russ.).
34. Polyakova T. A., Minbaleev A. V. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda «tsifrovoi zrelosti» [The Concept and Legal Nature of “Digital Maturity”]. Gosudarstvo i parvo, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 107–116. doi: 10.31857/S102694520016732–6. (In Russ.).
35. Turney S. Systematic Review: Definition, Examples & Guide, available at: https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/systematic-reviews (accessed 10. 10. 2023). (In Eng.).
36. Gaidyshev I. P. Modelirovanie stokhasticheskikh i determinirovannykh sistem: Rukovodstvo pol’zovatelya programmy AtteStat [Modeling of Stochastic and Deterministic Systems: User’s Guide to the Program AtteStat]. Kurgan, 2015. 484 p. (In Russ.).
37. Mayring Ph. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution, available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 (accessed 10. 12. 2023). (In Eng.).
38. Saati T. L. Prinyatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii [Decision-Making. Hierarchy Analysis Method]. Moscow, Radio i svyaz’, 1993, 320 p. (In Russ.).
39. Colli M., Madsen O., Berger U., Møller C., Wæhrens B. V., Bockholt M. Contextualizing the Outcome of a Maturity Assessment for Industry 4.0. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, vol. 51, iss. 11, pp. 1347–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.343. (In Eng.).
40. Eby K. Essential Guide to Process Maturity: Models, Tips, and Templates, available at: https://www.smartsheet.com/content/process-maturity (accessed 15. 12. 2023). (In Eng.).
41. Kalygina E. V., Efremov V. S. Adaptivnost’ organizatsiiv kontekste vneshnei neopredelennosti [Adaptability of the Organization in the Context of External Uncertainty]. Liderstvo i menedzhment, 2019, vol. 6 (3), pp. 223–228. doi: 10.18334/lim.6.3.41053. (In Russ.).
42. Bousdekis A., Apostolou D., Mentzas G. Predictive Maintenance in the 4<sup>th</sup> Industrial Revolution: Benefits, Business Opportunities, and Managerial Implications. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2020, vol. 48, iss. 1, рр. 57–62. doi: 10.1109/EMR.2019.2958037. (In Eng.).
43. Macchi M., Roda I., Fumagalli L. On the Advancement of Maintenance Management Towards Smart Maintenance in Manufacturing. In: Lödding H., Riedel R., Thoben K. D., Cieminski G., von, Kiritsis D. IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. APMS2017: Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 513, pp. 383–390. doi: 1007/978-3-319-66923-6_45. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Egorova L.E., Sandler D.G. Universities’ Readiness for Digital Transformation: a Managerial Aspect. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2024;28(3):17-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2024.03.022