Institutional Models of Scientific Mentoring for Russian University Students: Organizational and Managerial Aspects

The article aims at characterizing the institutional models of Russian university students’ scientific mentoring in the context of managing research activities. The institutional practices of scientific mentoring are an effective way to make an early academic career, to involve and retain talented students in the field of research and development, to popularize and strengthen the social status of science. Meanwhile, the traditional institutional forms existing in Russian universities should be developed and renewed. In addition, some practices of scientific mentoring are informal, which means that they do not have organizational support and conditions for reproduction. We focus on scientific mentoring for students of the first and second levels of higher education (bachelors, specialists, master students), who are considered as a «reserve» of the community of scientific youth. Our conclusions are based on the data of a sociological study carried out in 2023. Therein, we used methods of systematic analysis of scientific literature, of Russian and foreign universities’ websites content. The study included an online survey of 3032 students of Russian universities. The theoretical task is to substantiate the features of scientific mentoring as a scientific and educational institution. We highlight the institutional features and functions of scientific mentoring. Based on empirical data, we present the content of scientific mentoring institutional models, which have developed in modern foreign and Russian universities. The online survey of students showed their involvement in research activities, motivation for it, and the level of their scientific activity. The results of our research can be used in practice – to develop and improve scientific mentoring programs in Russian universities. The paper in general is the first attempt to interpret scientific mentoring from the standpoint of an institutional approach. We summarize the Soviet experience of scientific mentoring, as well as its modern institutional practices in foreign and Russian universities.

1. Chakravartty A. Scientific Knowledge vs. Knowledge of Science: Public Understanding and Science in Society, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00376-6 (accessed 15.03.2023). (In Eng.).

2. Bedessem B., Dozières A., Prévot A.-C., Julliard R. Science Knowledge and Trust in Science in Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects. Journal of Science Communication, 2023, vol. 22, iss. 01, article no. A05, pp. 1–21. (In Eng.).

3. Reznik S. D., Chernikovskaya M. V. Razvitie interesa studencheskoi molodezhi k nauchnomu poisku: opyt i problemy regional’nogo universiteta [Development of Students’ Interest in Scientific Research: Experience and Problems of a Regional University]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2020, vol. 5, no. 2 (16), pp. 186–194. (In Russ.).

4. Mamonova O. N., Yurchenko O. V. Nastavnichestvo v nauke: perspektivy i vyzovy [Mentoring in Science: Prospects and Challenges]. Poisk: Politika. Obshchestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sotsiologiya. Kul’tura, 2021, no. 5 (88), pp. 76–83. (In Russ.).

5. Kochemasova L. A. Nauchnoe nastavnichestvo v obrazovatel’noi praktike studenta pedagogicheskogo vuza [Scientific Mentoring in the Educational Practice of a Student of a Pedagogical University]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologopedagogicheskie nauki, 2021, vol. 18, no 1, pp. 29–46. (In Russ.).

6. Ronzhina N. V. Nauchnoe nastavnichestvo v protsesse formirovaniya universal’noi kompetentsii «sistemnoe i kriticheskoe myshlenie» [Scientific Mentoring in the Process of Forming Universal Competence «Systemic and Critical Thinking»]. In: E. F. Zeer, V. S. Tretyakova (Eds.), Prognozirovanie professional’nogo budushchego molodezhi v usloviyakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki, Ekaterinburg, 2020, pp. 126–130. (In Russ.).

7. Selezneva A. V., Popova S. Yu. Nastavnichestvo molodykh uchenykh: kontseptual’nye osnovaniya i instrumental’notekhnologicheskie resheniya [Mentoring Young Scientists: Conceptual Foundations and Instrumental-Technological Solutions]. Tsifrovoi uchenyi: laboratoriya filosofa, 2021, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 19–43. (In Russ.).

8. Mamonova O. N., Sosunova I. A., Yurchenko O. V. Nastavnichestvo v nauke kak indikator sotsial’nogo izmereniya modernizatsii i nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [Mentoring in Science as an Indicator of the Social Scaling of Modernization and Scientific and Technological Development]. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo, 2022, iss. 5, part 1, pp. 1060–1062. (In Russ.).

9. Isaev D. P. O vospriyatii nastavnichestva v nauchnykh dinastiyakh (po materialam interv’yu) [On the Perception of Mentoring in Scientific Dynasties (Based on Interview Materials)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2021, no. 63, pp. 122–130. (In Russ.).

10. Mansurov V. A. (Ed.). Professional’nye dinastii: vosproizvodstvo professional’nykh grupp [Professional Dynasties: Reproduction of Professional Groups], Moscow, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020, 208 p. (In Russ.).

11. Tadeush O. Naukove nastavnitstvo yak vid partners’koi vzaemodіi u suchasnomu unіversitetі [Scientific Mentoring as a Type of Partnership in a Modern University]. Osvіtologіchnii diskurs, 2022, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 113–132. (In Ukr.).

12. Schwortz A. C., Burrows Borowczak A. C., Guffey S. K. Mentoring Partnerships in Science Education. Educational Action Research, 2016, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1–20. (In Eng.).

13. Matthews K. E., Dwyer A., Hine L., Turner J. Conceptions of Students as Partners. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 957–971. (In Eng.).

14. Szczepański J. Elementarnye ponyatiya sotsiologii [Elementary Concepts of Sociology], Moscow, Progress, 1969, 237 p. (In Russ.).

15. North D. Instituty i ekonomicheskii rost: istoricheskoe vvedenie [Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction]. THESIS. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsial’nykh institutov i system, 1993, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 69–91. (In Russ.).

16. Zavyalov D. A. Studencheskie nauchnye obshchestva Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [Student Scientific Societies of St. Petersburg University in the Late XIX – Early XX Century], Doctor’s thesis, Saint Petersburg, 2006, 338 p. (In Russ.).

17. Melgunov S. P. Iz istorii studencheskikh obshchestv v russkikh universitetakh [From the History of Student Societies in Russian Universities], Moscow, Pravda, 1904, 71 p. (In Russ.).

18. Chagadaeva O. A. Studencheskie konstruktorskie byuro: ot neformal’nykh kruzhkov k ofitsial’nym nauchno-issledovatel’skim institutsiyam (1960–1980 gg.) [Student Design and Scientific Bureaus: From Informal Groups to Official Research Institutions (1960–1980)]. Problemy deyatel’nosti uchenogo i nauchnykh kollektivov, 2022, no. 8 (38), pp. 213–221. (In Russ.).

19. Almukhambetova A., Hernández-Torrano D. Gifted Students’ Adjustment and Underachievement in University: An Exploration From the Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2020, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 117–131. (In Eng.).

20. Hébert T. P., McBee M. T. The Impact of an Undergraduate Honors Program on Gifted University Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2020, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 136–151. (In Eng.).

21. Mendaglio S. Gifted Students’ Transition to University. Gifted Education International, 2013, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–12. (In Eng.).