How is Doctoral Students’ Admission Arranged at Russian Universities?
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.02.015
Abstract
The paper examines the rules and procedures of the doctoral students’ admission at Russian universities. The inefficiency of the selection process often becomes the subject of discussion in the studies devoted to the low performance of Russian doctoral education, but these studies lack structured information about the current rules and procedures. The present research closes this gap. Using the quantitative content analysis of the local admission rules of 150 random Russian universities, we estimated the prevalence of various admission practices. Two groups of universities are compared in the study: those with and those without special statuses (federal, national research, flagship, participants of the «5-100» program), since the presence of such a status implies that the university implements a set of measures aimed at developing doctoral programs and increasing the graduate students’ demand. The results of the study show that despite the absence of the regulatory restrictions on the choice of selection tools, Russian universities tend to choose fairly formal procedures: traditional exams and consideration of the individual achievements (papers, patents, diploma with honors). More flexible tools to assess the applicant’s motivation, his or her research experience, and plans for a dissertation are extremely rare and appear in universities with special statuses. The results of the research can be useful for the heads of the doctoral education departments at Russian universities, as well as for other staff involved in the process of the doctoral students’ admission.
About the Author
S. V. Zhuchkova
National Research University «Higher School of Economics»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Zhuchkova – PhD Student, Junior Research Fellow, Center for Sociology of Higher Education
16/10 Potapovskiy lane, Moscow, 101000
References
1. Terentev E. A., Kuzminov Ya. I., Froumin I. D. Nauka bez molodezhi? Krizis aspirantury i vozmozhnosti ego preodoleniya [Science without Youth? The Crisis of Doctoral Education and the Possibilities of Overcoming It], Moscow, Higher School of Economics (National Research University Publ.), 2021, 48 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bekova S. K. et al. Portret sovremennogo rossiiskogo aspiranta [The Portrait of Russian Doctoral Student], Moscow, Higher School of Economics (National Research University Publ.), 2017, 60 p. (In Russ.).
3. Vershinin I. V. Razvitie aspirantury v Rossii: resheniya v oblasti povysheniya adresnosti otbora postupayushchikh po programmam podgotovki kadrov vysshei kvalifikatsii [The Development of Postgraduate Studies in Russia: The Solutions to Improve the Targeting of Screened Applicants to Training of Highly Qualified Personnel]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie, 2015, vol. 10, nr 2, pp. 61–72. (In Russ.).
4. Rybakov N. V. Sovremennaya model’ rossiiskoi aspirantury: pilotnoe issledovanie pervogo vypuska [A New Model of Russian Postgraduate Education: Pilot Study of the First Graduation of PhD Students]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2018, vol. 27, nr 7, pp. 86–95. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-86-95. (In Russ.).
5. Senashenko V.S. Problemy organizatsii aspirantury na osnove FGOS tret’ego urovnya vysshego obrazovaniya [Problems of Postgraduate Training Organization on the Basis of the Federal State Educational Standards of the Third Level of Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2016, vol. 3, nr 199, pp. 33–43. (In Russ.).
6. Terentev E. A., Bekova S. K., Maloshonok N. G. Krizis rossiiskoi aspirantury: istochniki problem i vozmozhnosti ikh preodoleniya [The Crisis of Postgraduate Studies in Russia: What Bears Problems and How to Overcome Them]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2018, vol. 22, pp. 54–66. doi 10.15826/umpa.2018.05.049. (In Russ.).
7. Maloshonok N. G. Doctoral Students’ Reasons to Pursue a PhD as a Cause of Low Completion Rate of Russian PhD Programs. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2016, vol. 3, nr 9, pp. 18–20. (In Eng.).
8. Maloshonok N., Terentev E. National Barriers to the Completion of Doctoral Programs at Russian Universities. Higher Education, 2019, vol. 77, nr 2, pp. 195–211. doi 10.1007/s10734-018-0267-9. (In Eng.).
9. Bednyi B. I., Mironos A. A., Ostapenko L. A. Aspirantura kak tretii uroven’ vysshego obrazovaniya [PhD Programs as the Third Level of Higher Education]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2014, nr 3–4, pp. 22–27. (In Russ.).
10. Karavaeva E. V. et al. Aspirantura kak uroven’ vysshego obrazovaniya: sostoyanie, problemy, vozmozhnye resheniya [Postgraduate Course as a Level of Higher Education: Status, Problems, Possible Solutions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2018, vol. 27, nr 11, pp. 22–34. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-11-22-34. (In Russ.).
11. Shestak V. P., Shestak N. V. Aspirantura kak tretii uroven’ vysshego obrazovaniya: diskursivnoe pole [Postgraduate Studies at the Third Level of Higher Education: Discursive Field]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2015, nr 12, pp. 22–34. (In Russ.).
12. Arzhanova I. V. et al. Itogi realizatsii programm razvitiya opornykh universitetov v 2016 g. [Results of Pillar Universities Development Program Implementation for 2016]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017, vol. 21, nr 4, pp. 11–21. doi 10.15826/umpa.2017.04.045. (In Russ.).
13. Bolsinova M., Shmelev A. Vzaimosvyaz’ individual’nolichnostnykh osobennostei studentov i uspeshnosti prokhozhdeniya ekzamena v komp’yuterizirovannoi i traditsionnoi forme [The Relationship of Students’ Individual Personality Traits and their Success in Examinations Conducted in Computerized and Traditional Forms]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2010, vol. 3, nr 12, p. 5. doi 10.54359/ps.v3i12.1042. (In Russ.).
14. Hasgall A. et al. Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures. Berlin: EUA-CDE, 2019. 35 p. (In Eng.).
15. Kent J., McCarthy M. T. Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions: A Report from the Council of Graduate Schools. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, 2016. 36 p. (In Eng.).
16. Kuncel N.R., Hezlett S.A., Ones D.S. A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for Graduate Student Selection and Performance. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, vol. 127, nr 1, pp. 162–181. doi 10.1037/0033–2909.127.1.162. (In Eng.).
17. Bair C. R., Haworth J. G. Doctoral Student Attrition and Persistence: A Meta-Synthesis of Research. In: Smart J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Dordrecht, 2005, pp. 481–534. (In Eng.).
18. Cunningham-Williams R. M. et al. Research Productivity of Social Work PhD Candidates Entering the Academic Job Market: An Analysis of Pre- and Postadmission Productivity Indicators. Journal of Social Work Education, 2018, vol. 54, nr 4, pp. 776–791. doi 10.1080/10437797.2018.1503126. (In Eng.).
19. Laurance W. F. et al. Predicting Publication Success for Biologists. BioScience, 2013, vol. 63, nr 10, pp. 817–823. doi 10.1525/bio.2013.63.10.9. (In Eng.).
20. Pinheiro D., Melkers J., Youtie J. Learning to Play the Game: Student Publishing as an Indicator of Future Scholarly Success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, vol. 81, pp. 56–66. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008. (In Eng.).
21. Stock W. A., Siegfried J. J. The Undergraduate Origins of PhD Economists Revisited. The Journal of Economic Education, 2015, vol. 46, nr 2, pp. 150–165. doi 10.1080/00220485.2015.1015187. (In Eng.).
22. Burmeister J. et al. Correlation of admissions statistics to graduate student success in medical physics. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2014, vol. 15, nr 1, pp. 375–385. doi 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4451. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Zhuchkova S.V. How is Doctoral Students’ Admission Arranged at Russian Universities? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2022;26(2):92-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.02.015
Views:
687
Email this article 