Does the Increase of the Scientific Achievements Lead to Decrease in the Quality of Education?
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.04.038
Abstract
This research article is devoted to the problem of training personnel with higher medical education during the transition to an independent assessment of the graduates’ qualifications and new requirements for the effectiveness of scientific work of universities. The aim of this work was to study the correspondence between the quality of graduate training and the scientific productivity of medical universities. The authors analyzed the results of the accreditation examination of graduates of medical universities as an indicator of the quality of specialists’ training and scientometric indicators in the relevant specialty. As a result of the data analysis, the problem of discrepancy between high scientific productivity of universities and successful completion of accreditation by young specialists was revealed. The authors believe that a possible reason for this discrepancy is the high load on the teaching staff.
Furthermore, detailed study of this problem is needed and, most likely, a revision of the approach to the work organization of medical universities’ teaching staff.
About the Authors
M. B. Khrustalev
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maksim B. Khrustalev – Doctor of Science (Medicine), Chief for the Department of Science and Research Administration
6–8, L’va Tolstogo street, Saint Petersburg, 197022
N. Yu. Turbina
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia Yu. Turbina – Scientific Researcher at the Department of Science and Research Administration
6–8, L’va Tolstogo street, Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. V. Tishkov
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem V. Tishkov – Doctor of Science (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor, Chief of the Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics
6–8, L’va Tolstogo street, Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. A. Maksimova
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Maksimova – Doctor of Science (Medicine), Head of the Research Department of Science and Research Administration
6–8, L’va Tolstogo street, Saint Petersburg, 197022
Z. A. Zaripova
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zulfiya A. Zaripova – Doctor of Science (Medicine), Assistant Professor, Chief for the Center for Certification and Accreditation, Assistant Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
6–8, L’va Tolstogo street, Saint Petersburg, 197022
References
1. Z. B. Akhmetova, A. K. Kozhakhmetova, A. D. Asanova. Rol upravleniya proyektami v integratsii nauki. obrazovaniya i biznesa [The role of Project Management in the Integration of Science, Education and Business]. Ekonomika. Professiya. Biznes [Economics. Profession. Business], 2021, nr 1, pp. 5–10. doi 10.14258/epb202101. (In Russ.).
2. S. G. Fernández, R. Kubus, J. M. Pérez-Iñigo. Innovation Ecosystems in the EU: Policy Evolution and Horizon Europe Proposal Case Study (the Actors’ Perspective). Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, nr 17, art. 4735. doi 10.3390/SU11174735. (In Eng.).
3. Unger M., Polt W. The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation – A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, nr 2, pp. 10–26. doi 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.10.26. (In Eng.).
4. Raunio M., Nordling N., Kautonen M., Räsänen P. Open Innovation Platforms as a Knowledge Triangle Policy Tool – Evidence from Finland. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, nr 2, pp. 62–76. doi 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.62.76. (In Eng.).
5. Brorstad Borlaug S., Aanstad S. The Knowledge Triangle in the Healthcare Sector – The Case of Three Medical Faculties in Norway. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, nr 1, pp. 68–75. doi 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.1.68.75. (In Eng.).
6. Novikova V. Nauchno-obrazovatelnyj kompleks evropejskogo soyuza I evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: sravnitelnyj aspect. [Science and Higher Education in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union: Comparative Analysis.]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. [Law and Administration. 21st Century], 2021, vol. 3, pp. 91–97. doi 10.24833/2073-8420-2017-3-44-91-97. (In Russ.).
7. Belyakov S. A., Fedotov A. V., Figurin A. V. Protsessy ob”edineniya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: problemy i vozmozhnosti [Integration Processes in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2013, nr 6, pp. 8–18. doi 10.2174/1874210602115010017. (In Russ.).
8. Gogolev N. M., Aprosimov L. A, Potapov A. F., Ushnitskii I. D. Pervichnaya akkreditaciya vypusknikov medicinskogo instituta kak ehtap podgotovki specialistov novoj formacii. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova. Seriya: Medicinskie nauki. [The Pr imary Accreditation of Medical Institute Graduates as of Part of the Training of New Formation Specialists]. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova [Bulletin of Nor th-Eas tern Federal Univer s ity named after M. K. Ammosov], 2017, nr 1 (6), pp. 18–24. doi 10.46594/2687-0037_2020_3_1203. (In Russ.).
9. Sizova Zh. M., Semenova T. V., Chelyshkova M. B. Ocenka professional’noj gotovnosti specialistov zdravookhraneniya pri akkreditacii. Medicinskij vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. [Estimation of Professional Readiness of Health Care Experts at Accreditation]. Meditsinskii vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza [Medical news of the North Caucasus], 2017, vol. 12, nr 4, pp. 459–463. doi 10.14300/mnnc.2017.12127. (In Russ.).
10. Zaropova Z. A., Vakhitov M. Sh., Avramenko E. A., Semenov S. A. Podgotovka, planirovanie i provedenie pervichnoj specializirovannoj akkreditacii: «svoi» i «chuzhie» (analiticheskij obzor, sobstvennye dannye) [Preparation, Planning and Implementation of Primary Specialized Accreditation: «Own» and «Others» (Analytical Review, Own Data)]. Virtual’nye tekhnologii v medicine [Virtual Technologies in Medicine], 2021, nr 1 (27), pp. 8–12. doi 10.46594/2687-0037_2021_1_1286. (In Russ.).
11. Akoev M. A., Makrusova V. A., Moskaleva O. V., Pislyakov V. V. Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii [Handbook on Scientometrics: Science and Technology Development Indicators]. Ekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2021, 234 p. (In Russ.).
12. Ershtein L. B. Chrezmernaya nagruzka prepodavatelej vuzov kak factor razrusheniya vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii. Vestnik PNIPU. Social’no-ekonomicheskie nauki [Excessive Workload of University Teachers as a Factor of Destruction or Higher Education in Russia]. Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki [PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin], 2021, nr 2, pp. 75–87. doi 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.2.6. (In Russ.).
13. Amara N., Landry R., Halilem N. What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, Springer; Akadémiai Kiadó, May, 2015, vol. 103, nr 2, pp. 489–530. doi 10.1007/s11192-015-1537-2. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Khrustalev M.B., Turbina N.Yu., Tishkov A.V., Maksimova A.A., Zaripova Z.A. Does the Increase of the Scientific Achievements Lead to Decrease in the Quality of Education? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(4):99-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.04.038
Views:
463
Email this article 