The universities’ role in developing citizen science discourse
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.03.026
Abstract
The article, aimed at mapping ways to enhance the systemic character and sustainability of citizen science, analyses the state of its discourse in the Russian context. The analysis, relying upon the multiple actor interdisciplinary paradigm within the framework of rational agency, applied comparative and analytical methods. The research concentrated on identifying common invariant features in the processes of initiating and developing citizen science projects, as well as on distinguishing core unresolved issues. The article points out the relevance of citizen science, viewing the latter as a reflection of changes in the relationships and activities undertaken by people, communities and society at large, diverse actors getting more and more involved in these activities, with their functionality and impact on social processes being expanded. The research can be considered brandly new, because it defines the role of citizen science as a new synergetic paradigm for the development of science and higher education in Russia, and as an important communication-and-cooperation channel between higher education and society at large. In particular, it is revealed that at the macrolevel, citizen science projects contribute to the democratization of both scientific research and society as a whole by invoking actors from various social spheres and subsystems, as well as by strengthening citizens’ confidence in the state. At the microlevel, the projects contribute to the universities’ educational and social mission, expand and diversify the interaction of HEIs with society, and foster new research questions formulation. The practical use of the research is viewed as a possible integration of our conclusions in the further practice-oriented investigations, in forming citizen science backgrounds, competences, and methodological base. Of no less importance are the materials for the training programmes modernization in the field of science and higher education administration.
About the Authors
A. A. Muravyeva
National Erasmus+ Office in Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Muravyeva – PhD (Philology), Deputy Head
2nd Entuziastov str., 5, Building 41, Room V/5, Moscow, 111024
+7 495 972-35-90
O. N. Oleynikova
National Erasmus+ Office in Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga N. Oleynikova – Dr. hab. (Pedagogy), Professor, Head
2nd Entuziastov str., 5, Building 41, Room V/5, Moscow, 111024
+7 495 972-35-90
References
1. Cooper C. Citizen Science: How Ordinary People are Changing the Face of Discovery. N. Y. : Harry N. Abrams, 2016. 304 р. (In Eng.).
2. Kleiner G. B. Mezhdistsiplinarnost’, sistemnost’, garmoniya – orientiry razvitiya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh issledovanii [Interdisciplinarity, Consistency, Harmony – Guidelines for the Development of Socio-Economic Research]. In: Perspektivy razvitiya mezhdistsiplinarnykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i gumanitarnykh issledovanii. Doklady i vystupleniya uchastnikov kruglogo stola (24 iyunya 2015, Rostov-na-Donu), Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Press, 2015, pp. 12–32. (In Russ.).
3. Prodyblokh N. E. Sotsial’naya rol’ universiteta v sovremennom transformiruyushchemsya obshchestve [Social Role of a University in the Modern Transforming Society]. Vestnik Maikopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2018, iss. 01, pp. 87–93. (In Russ.).
4. Data Management and Use: Governance in the 21st Century. A Joint Report by the British Academy and the Royal Society. London : The British Academy and the Royal Society, June 2017. 95 p. (In Eng.)
5. Ponti M., Craglia M. Citizen-Generated Data for Public Policy. A Brief Review of European Citizen Generated Data Projects (JRC120231). Ispra : European Commission, 2020. 74 р. (In Eng.).
6. Linders D. From e-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, October 2012, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 446–454. doi 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003. (In Eng.).
7. Holdren J. P. Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on the Subject of «Addressing Societal and Scientific Challenges through Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing». Washington DC : Office of Science and Technology, 2015. 11 p. (In Eng.).
8. The Governance of Change in Socio-Technical and Innovation Systems: Three Pillars for a Conceptual Framework. In: S. Borrás, J. Edler (eds.), The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems, Cheltenham. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2014, сhap. 2, pp. 23–48. doi 10.4337/9781784710194. (In Eng.).
9. Hecker S., Haklay M., Bowser A., Makuch Z., Vogel J., Bonn A. (eds.). Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London : UCL Press, 2018. 542 p. doi 10.14324/111.9781787352339. (In Eng.).
10. Socientize. White Paper on Citizen Science for Europe. European Commission, 2015, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/socientize_white_paper_on_citizen_science.pdf (accessed 06.03.2021). (In Eng.).
11. Lichten C., Ioppolo R., D’Angelo C., Simmons R. K., Jones M. M. Citizen Science: Crowdsourcing for Research. Cambridge : The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, 2018. 20 p. (In Eng.).
12. Noveck В. S. Smart Citizens, Smarter State. The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 2015. 368 p. (In Eng.).
13. Wyler D., Grey F., Maes K., Fröhlich J. Сitizen Science at Universities: Trends, Guidelines and Recommendations, Advice Paper, LERU, October 2016, nr 20, 24 p. (In Eng.).
14. Craglia M., Shanley L. A. Data Democracy: Increased Supply of Geospatial Information and Expanded Participatory Processes in the Production of Data. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2015, vol. 8, iss. 9, pp. 1–15. doi 10.1080/17538947.2015.1008214. (In Eng.).
15. Mergel I., Kattel R., Lember V., McBride K. CitizenOriented Digital Transformation in the Public Sector. In: B. A. Zuiderwijk, C. C. Hinnant (eds.), Proceedings of 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, New York, 2018, art. 122, pp. 1–3. doi 10.1145/3209281.3209294. (In Eng.).
16. Elanchik O., Petrov M., Khoruzhaya A., Mol’kova V. Kak vlozhit’ sebya v nauku. Otdat’ uchenym mozgi, ruki, glaza i den’gi [How to Invest Yourself in Science. Give Scientists Brains, Hands, Eyes and Money]. Kot Shredingera, 16.11.2016, available at: https://rg.ru/2016/11/16/grazhdanskaia-nauka-kak-otdat-uchyonym-svoi-mozgi-ruki-i-kompiutery.html (accessed 12.04.2021). (In Russ.).
17. Maksutova A., Mustyats O. V Rossii seichas est’ proekty grazhdanskoi nauki v uzkom smysle? [Does Russia Now Have Citizen Science Projects in a Narrow Sense?] Feniks Sapiens, 05.08.2020, nr 311, available at: https://trv-science.ru/2020/08/citizen-science-nauka-dlya-lyubitelej/ (accessed 12.04.2021). (In Russ.).
18. Borisova A. Grazhdanskaya nauka v deistvii: kak uchenye-lyubiteli pomogayut issledovat’ COVID-19, dikuyu prirodu i drugie galaktiki [Citizen Science in Action: How Amateur Scientists Are Helping Explore COVID-19, Wildlife, and Other Galaxies], available at: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/414229-grazhdanskaya-nauka-v-deystvii-kak-uchenye-lyubiteli-pomogayut-issledovat-covid-/ (accessed 18.04.2021). (In Russ.).
19. Sokolenko O. «Lyudi nauki»: kto oni, pionery grazhdanskoi nauki v Rossii? [«People of Science»: Who Are They, the Pioneers of Citizen Science in Russia?], available at: https://republic.ru/posts/98213 (accessed 18.04.2021). (In Russ.).
20. Maslanov E. V., Dolmatov A. V. Grazhdanskaya nauka – nauka kak prizvanie [Citizen Science – Science as a Vocation]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 2019, vol. 56, nr 3, pp. 40–44. doi 10.5840/eps201956345. (In Russ.).
21. Open Science Policy. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future Strategy (European Commission, 2020), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-science (accessed 15.03.2021). (In Eng.).
22. Science with and for Society (SwafS): Horizon 2020 Project. Work Programme 2018–2020 (European Commission, 2020), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/default/files/h2020-swafs-2018–2020_prepublication_2.pdf (accessed 06.03.2021). (In Eng.).
23. Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World a vision for Europe. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 108 p. (In Eng.).
24. Lämmerhirt D., Gray J., Venturini T., Meunier A. Advancing Sustainability Together? Citizen-Generated Data and the Sustainable Development Goals, available at: https://www.data4sdgs.org/sites/default/files/services_files/Advancing%20Sustainability%20Together%20CGD%20Report_0.pdf (accessed 16.03.2021). (In Eng.).
25. Eitzel M. V., Cappadonna J. L., Santos-Lang C., Duerr R. E. [et al.]. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 1–20. doi 10.5334/cstp.96. (In Eng.).
26. Hecker S., Bonn A., Richter A. [et al.]. Green Paper CS Strategy 2020 for Germany. Halle – Jena – Leipzig : Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, 2016. 40 p. (In Eng.).
27. Robinson L., Cawthray J. L., West S. E., Bonn A., Ansine J. 10 Principles of Citizen Science. In: S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, A. Bonn (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, London, UCL Press, 2018, part I, pp. 27–41. doi 10.14324/111.9781787352339. (In Eng.).
28. Gray J., Marres N. The Data City as Public Experiment? Available at: https://jonathangray.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/GrayMarres_DataCityPublicExperiment.pdf (accessed 16.03.2021). (In Eng.).
29. Brenton P., Gavel S. von, Vogel E., Lecoq M. E. Technology Infrastructure for Citizen Science. In: S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, A. Bonn (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, London, UCL Press, 2018, part I, pp. 63–81. doi 10.14324/111.9781787352339. (In Eng.).
30. Maccani G., Goossensen M., Righi V., Creus J., Balestrini M. Scaling up Citizen Science. What are the Factors Associated with Increased Reach and How to Lever Them to Achieve Impact? Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/en/community/citizensdata/document/scaling-citizen-science-what-are-factors-associated-increasedreach (accessed 11.04.2021). (In Eng.).
31. Kaartinen R., Hardwick B., Roslin T. Using Citizen Scientists to Measure an Ecosystem Service Nationwide. Ecology – Ecological Society of America, November 2013, vol. 94, iss. 11, pp. 2645–2652. doi 10.1890/12-1165.1. (In Eng.).
32. Haklay M. Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective, available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/citizen-science-and-policy-european-perspective (accessed 16.04.2021). (In Eng.).
33. Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, June 2019, vol. 36, iss. 4, art. 101385, 16 p. doi 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002. (In Eng.).
34. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. N. Y. : The Free Press, 2010. 546 p. (In Eng.).
35. Venkatesh V., Thong J. Y. L., Xu X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 2012, vol. 36, nr 1 (March), pp. 157–178. doi 10.2307/41410412. (In Eng.).
36. Fishbain B., Lerner U., Castell N. [et al.]. An Evaluation Tool Kit of Air Quality Micro-Sensing Units. CITI-SENSE Project, 2017. 25 p. doi 10.17863/CAM.9573. (In Eng.).
Review
For citations:
Muravyeva A.A., Oleynikova O.N. The universities’ role in developing citizen science discourse. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(3):45-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.03.026
Views:
566
Email this article 