Russian Flagship Universities’ Incomes: Dynamics and Tendencies
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.02.020
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
This research article aims at identifying the impact of establishing flagship universities on the dynamics and structure of their income. The study is based on analyzing the growth rate of total income and income per 1 scientific and pedagogical worker in 2019–2020 as compared to 2015 reference year (taking inflation into account), together with finding out changes in the share of off-budget revenues, revenues from research and development work. There are used standard techniques of descriptive statistics, paired Student’s t-test for related samples, Mann-Whitney U-test, and cluster analysis. The total income of all flagship universities has grown, but, however, show deeper differentiation. The group of leaders have increased their revenues by 0,5–1,0 billion rubles in 2015 prices, but a number of universities face stagnated or declining income. The COVID-19 pandemic has had little or no impact on income differentiation and dyna mics. The by-income stratification per 1 scientific and pedagogical worker is lower, which indicates a personnel decrease in a number of clusters with stable or declining income. Neither institution’s joining the first or the second wave of flagship universities nor the availability of special federal funding has a statistically significant relationship with income dynamics. At the same time, the majority of flagship universities get the same stable share of income from research activities and did not decrease their dependence on the budget system. This indicates either the absence of major chan gesor the simultaneous growth of income from research activities and additional funding like federal programs, projects, grants. Not all flagship universities have been able to increase revenues, so the leaders’ experience requires further analysis. The results of the study may possibly be of interest for managers of both flagship and other categories of universities, as well as for those who are going to substantiate management decisions within the latest Priority-2030 program.
About the Author
I. V. KorchaginaRussian Federation
Irina V. Korchagina – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Analysis, Audit and Taxation, Institute of Economics and Management
6 Krasnaya str., Kemerovo, 650043
+7 384 258-08-92
References
1. Marginson S. Obshchestvennye blaga, proizvodimye v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh Rossii [The Public Good Created by Higher Education Institutions in Russia]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2017, nr 3, pp. 8-36. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-3-8-36. (In Russ.).
2. Williams G. Higher Education: Public Good or Private Commodity? London Review of Education, 2016, vol. 14, nr 1, pp. 131-142. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.14.1.12. (In Eng.).
3. Navas S. The Start of Something Big? Can Edtech Startups Solve the Biggest Challenges Faced by UK Universities? Available at: https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7785/1/the-start-of-something-big-edtech-report.pdf (accessed 10.05.2021). (In Eng.).
4. Navas S. The Future of Revenue Diversification in Higher Education. Part 1 - Why Are We Investing in This Space? Available at: https://medium.com/emerge-edtechinsights/the-future-of-revenue-diversification-in-higher-edu-cation-part-1-why-are-we-investing-in-this-d2a0fca8c8d5 (accessed 10.05.2021). (In Eng.).
5. Taylor M. What is Good University Financial Management? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2013, vol. 17, nr 4, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2013.835289. (In Eng.).
6. Deering D., Creso M. Financial Management of Canadian Universities: Adaptive Strategies to Fiscal Constraints. Tertiary Education and Management, 2014, vol. 20, nr 3, pp. 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.919604. (In Eng.).
7. Sudakova A. E., Sandler D. G., Tarasyeva T. V. Konkurentsiya mezhdu vuzami: kontseptual’nyi analiz [Competition among Universities: Conceptual Analysis]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2020, vol. 24, nr 4, pp. 58-74. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.04.035. (In Russ.).
8. Brennan J., Cochrane A., Lebeau Y., Williams R. The University in its Place: Social and Cultural Perspectives on the Regional Role of Universities, Springer, 2018, 240 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1296-3. (In Eng.).
9. Valero A., Reenen J. The Economic Impact of Universities: Evidence From Across the Globe. Economics of Education Review, 2019, vol. 68, nr 2, pp. 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.001. (In Eng.).
10. Rudenko D. Yu. Proekt «5-100»: otsenka ego vozdeistviya na publikatsionnuyu aktivnost’ universitetov [The Effect of Project 5-100 on the University’s Publication Activity]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2020, vol. 24, nr 3, pp. 27-45. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.03.024. (In Russ.).
11. Korchagin R. L. Spetsifika evolyutsii tekhnologicheskogo predprinimatel’stva v razvivayushchikhsya i perekhodnykh stranakh [Specifics of Evolution of Technological Entrepreneurship in Developing and Transition Countries]. Innovatsii, 2020, nr 12 (266), pp. 63-70. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2020.266.12.008. (In Russ.).
12. Abankina I. V. Finansirovanie obrazovaniya: trend na personalizatsiyu [Financing of Education: Trend on Personalization]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii, 2019, nr 1, pp. 216-225. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2019-41- 1-11. (In Russ.).
13. Chirică O., Puşcaş B. The Diversification of Income Sources in the Higher Education Public Institution Budgets. Audit Financiar, 2018, vol. 16, nr 1, pp. 148-156. https://doi.org/10.20869/ AUDITF/2018/149/007. (In Eng.).
14. Estermann T., Pruvot E. Financially Sustainable Universities II. European Universities Diversifying Income Streams, available at: eua.eu/downloads/publications/financially sustainable universities ii - european universities diversifying income streams. pdf (accessed 10.05.2021). (In Eng.).
15. Mitchell M., Leachman M., Masterson K. A Lost Decade in Higher Education Funding. State Cuts Have Driven Up Tuition and Reduced Quality, available at: https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2017_higher_ed_8-22-17_ final.pdf (accessed 10.05.2021). (In Eng.).
16. Mitchell M., Leachman M., Saens M. State Higher Education Funding Cuts Have Pushed Costs to Students, Worsened Inequality, available at: https://www.cbpp.org sites/default/files/atoms/files/10-24-19sfp.pdf (accessed 10.05.2021). (In Eng.).
17. Witze A. Universities Will Never Be the Same after the Coronavirus Crisis. Nature, 2020, vol. 582, pp. 162-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01518-y. (In Eng.).
18. Miranda A., Tenedero L., Fiel-Miranda J., Celestino E. The Income-Generating Projects of a Government Academic Institution in the Philippines: The Case of the University of Eastern Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 10, nr 1, pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-12-2016-006. (In Eng.).
19. Munyua W., Abate S., Huka G., Dawe S. Financing of Higher Education in Africa: A Case of Ethiopia Public Universities Revenue Diversification Strategies. International Journal of Business and Public Management, 2011, vol. 1, nr 1, pp. 15-21. (In Eng.).
20. Chinyoka A., Mutambara E. The Challenges of Revenue Generation in State Universities: The Case of Zimbabwe. Cogent Social Sciences, 2020, vol. 6, nr 1, article 1748477. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1748477. (In Eng.).
21. Jacobson L. Getting Resourceful: How Administrators Can Generate Alternative Sources of Revenue, available at: https://www.highereddive.com/news/getting-resourceful-how-administrators-can-generate-alternative-sourcesof/446626 (accessed 15.05.2021). (In Eng.).
22. Huggins R., Izuchi H., Prokop D. Networks, Space and Organizational Performance: A Study of the Determinants of Industrial Research Income Generation by Universities. Regional Studies, 2016, vol. 50, nr 12, pp. 2055-2068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1090560. (In Eng.).
23. Thatcher A., Zhang M., Todoroski H., Chau A., Wang J., Liang G. Predicting the Impact of COVID-19 on Australian Universities. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2020, vol. 13, nr 9, article 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090188. (In Eng.).
24. Douglass J. and Hawkins J. (eds.) Envisioning the Asian New Flagship University: Its Past and Vital Future, Berkeley Public Policy Press, 2017, 248 p. (In Eng.).
25. Douglass J. (ed.) The New Flagship University: Changing the Paradigm from Global Ranking to National Relevancy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 217 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500496. (In Eng.).
26. Douglass J. A Vibrant Urban University with a Growing Global Presence: Thoughts on What Malmö University Could Be, Malmö University, 2017, 56 p. (In Eng.).
27. Petrosyants D. V. Opornye universitety: regional’nye draivery razvitiya [Flagship Universities: Regional Development Drivers]. Regional’nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, 2019, nr 8 (106), pp. 57-65. https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2019-8-57-65. (In Russ.).
28. Ivanov S. A., Sokol-Nomokonov E. N. Fenomen opornykh universitetov regional’noi ekonomiki v sovremennoi Rossii [The Phenomenon of Flagship Universities of Regional Economy in Modern Russia]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2018, vol. 27, nr 1, pp. 19-30. (In Russ.).
29. Ovchinnikova N. E. Formirovanie opornykh universitetov kak draiverov razvitiya territorii [Formation of Flagship Universities as Territory Development Drivers]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017, vol. 21, nr 4, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.04.048. (In Russ.).
30. Amirov R. A. Opornye vuzy kak draivery sotsial’noekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov strany [Flagship Universities as Drivers of Socio-Economic Development of Country’s Regions]. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, vol. 33, nr 2, pp. 21-26. https://doi.org/10.21779/2500-1930-2018-33-2-21-26. (In Russ.).
31. Ar uty unov V. V. Rezul’tativnost’ nauchnoi deyatel’nosti opornykh vuzov Rossii [Scientific Performance at Russia’s Flagship Universities]. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2018, nr 3, pp. 33-43. (In Russ.).
32. Zmiyak S. S., Ugnich E. A., Taranov P. M., Yarovaya N. S. Rol’ opornogo universiteta v razvitii regional’noi innovatsionnoi ekosistemy [The Role of Flagship University in the Regional Innovation Ecosystem Development]. Nauchnyi vestnik: finansy, banki, investitsii, 2019, nr 1 (46), pp. 163-171. (In Russ.).
33. Maksimova T. G., Bogdanova E. L., Brovka G. M. Issledovanie izmeneniya roli vedushchikh universitetov v natsional’noi innovatsionnoi ekosisteme pri perekhode k modeli «Universitet 4.0» [Study of Changing Role of Leading Universities in the National Innovation Ecosystem during Transition to the University 4.0 Model]. Nauka i tekhnika, 2020, vol. 19, nr 3, pp. 258-266. https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-3-258-266. (In Russ.).
34. Romanenko K. R., Lisyutkin M. A. Universitetskie ob”edineniya v Rossii: chetyre volny obrazovatel’noi politiki [University Mergers in Russia: Four Waves of Educational Policy]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017, vol. 21, nr 3 (109), pp. 112-120. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.03.043. (In Russ.).
35. Berestov A. V., Guseva A. I., Kalashnik V. M., Kaminsky V. I., Kireev S. V., Sadchikov S. M. Opornye universitety - potentsial razvitiya regionov i otraslei [Flagship Universities as Development Potential of Regions and Industries]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2020, vol. 29, nr 8/9, pp. 9-25. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-8-9-9-25. (In Russ.).
36. Surovitskaya G. V. Sravnitel’naya konkurentosposobnost’ opornykh universitetov Rossii [Comparative Competitiveness of Russian Flagship Universities]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017, vol. 21, nr 4 (110), pp. 63-75. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.04.050. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Korchagina I.V. Russian Flagship Universities’ Incomes: Dynamics and Tendencies. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(2):141-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.02.020
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)