Preview

University Management: Practice and Analysis

Advanced search

THE CONSUMER VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEM OF THE FAR EAST OF RUSSIA

https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.05.065

Abstract

The aim of this research article is to study the essence of Russian Far East innovation ecosystem as the center of knowledge generation and defining consumer value of knowledge, as well as the design of areas for developing institutional environment of macro-region innovation ecosystem that would allow for defining the direction of Far East universities innovation development. In the article, based on a comparative analysis of scientific approaches to the characteristics of ecosystems, the content and main features of innovative ecosystems are revealed, their key components and interaction features are defined. From the point of view of systematic approach authors formulate the interpretation of innovation ecosystem as an open dynamic self-organizing and self - developing system consisting of organizational, structural and functional components (institutions) and their relations, which creates, uses and transforms academic knowledge and ideas into innovation products in the complex matrix of relations between its components. The interpretation of the category of innovation ecosystem from the point of view of the system approach is formulated. The role and importance of the formation process of the consumer value of knowledge in the innovation ecosystem is revealed. It has been proven that consumer value is the basis for acknowledging efficacy of research and technical results as the view of a consumer and his/her readiness to pay for the device defines consumer value of such a device and technical knowledge behind it. The article provides grounds for instruments of creating innovation consumer value such as commercialization and valorization. Several characteristics of intellectual components of Russian and Russian Far East economics are given. The authors point out the problems hindering the development of innovation ecosystem. The need for formulating methodological approach to evaluating innovation territorial unity - innovation ecosystem of the macro-region has been proven. Authors demonstrate that in order to form macro-region innovation ecosystem model it is necessary to create modern network system of university science based on «digital manufacture». The article contains priority areas for innovation development of Far East Universities and macro-region innovation ecosystem. The novelty and originality of the conducted research is in defining knowledge customer value in innovation ecosystem of the Russian Far East area and is reflected in designing innovation development areas for Far East universities and institutional environment of macro-region innovation ecosystem. This article is of particular interest to innovation ecosystem subjects that need to conduct targeted interaction with each other and external environment which is a relevant problem of managing macro-region ecosystem.

About the Authors

N. V. Shashlo
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation


G. G. Petruk
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation


References

1. Chesbrough H. W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. 227 p.

2. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development, EASST Review, 1995, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14-19.

3. Ицковиц Г. Тройная спираль: университеты - предприятия - государство: инновации в действии. Томск: Изд-во Томского государственного университета систем управления и радиоэлектроники, 2010. 238 с.

4. RussellM. G., Still K., Huhtamaki J. et al. Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284726075_Transforming_Innovation_Ecosystems_through_Shared_Vision_and_Network_Orchestration (accessed 01.09.2017).

5. Maxwell I. E. Managing Sustainable Innovation: The Driver for Global Growth. N. Y.: Springer, 2009. 200 p.

6. Lundvall B.-A., Johnson B. The Learning Economy, Journal of Industry Studies, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 23-42.

7. Иванова Н. Национальные инновационные системы. М.: Наука, 2002. 224 с.

8. Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe, Geoforum, 1992, no. 23, pp. 365-382.

9. Breschi S. Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics and Spatial Boundaries. In: Edquist C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation, London, 1997, pp. 130-156.

10. Carlsson B., Stankiewicz R. On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1991, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 93-118.

11. Corporate Innovation Systems. A Comparative Study of Multi-Technology Corporations in Japan, Sweden and the USA, available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.5133&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 20.08.2017) .

12. Смородинская Н. В. Глобализированная экономика: от иерархий к сетевому укладу. M.: ИЭ РАН, 2015. 344 c.

13. Nelson R. (ed.). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, 1993. 541 p.

14. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014, available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/69a64699-18d7-40b9-8f92-1db3226cd2ec (accessed 20.08.2017).

15. Science and Engineering Indicators. National Science Board 2014, available at: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/ (accessed 20.08.2017).

16. Audretsch D. B., Grimm H., Wessner C. Local Heroes in the Global Village. Globalization and New Entrepreneurship Policies. N. Y.: Springer Science + Media Inc., 2005. 196 p.

17. Норт Д. Інституції, іституційна зміна та функціонування економіки. Київ: Основи, 2000. 198 с.

18. Венчурные инвестиции и экосистема технологического предпринимательства. М.: Бизнес-журнал, [2011]. 96 с.

19. Ляшенко О. М. Європейська модель валоризації інновацій // Матеріали VI (XVIII) Всеукр. наук.-практ. конф. «Міжнародне науково-технічне співробітництво: принципи, механізми, ефективність» / редкол.: В. Г. Герасимчук (відпов. ред.) та ін. Київ: НТУУ «КПІ», 2010. С. 75.

20. Економічна енциклопедія: У 3-х т . / редкол.: С. В. Мочерний (відп. ред.) та ін. Київ: Академія; Тернопіль: Академія народного господарства, 2000. Т. 1. 863 с.

21. Мониторинг эффективности деятельности организаций высшего образования [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://indicators.miccedu.ru/monitoring/ (дата обращения: 20.08.2017) .

22. Федеральная служба государственной статистики [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/ (дата обращения: 20.08.2017).

23. Организации и персонал, выполняющие научные исследования и разработки. Вып. 4 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.csrs.ru/archive/stat_2016_pers/stat_2016_pers.pdf (дата обращения: 20.08.2017).


Review

For citations:


Shashlo N.V., Petruk G.G. THE CONSUMER VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEM OF THE FAR EAST OF RUSSIA. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017;21(5):93-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.05.065

Views: 636


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6640 (Print)
ISSN 1999-6659 (Online)