University Management: Rector’s Position (Conceptual Notes)

The key actor in any university management system is the rector; his/her priorities and goals to a large extent determine the prospects of the university. This conceptual article deals with the following issues: what a position in activity is; what a rector’s position is, why it should be the subject of the analysis; what rector’s positions can be; how a rector’s position can be formed.

The authors put forward the concept of «rector’s position», based on philosophical ideas about the position as a form of human subjectivity. As a basis for a typological analysis of rectors’ positions, a scheme «Position space» is proposed, wherein three poles are distinguished: «Norm», «Business», «Idea». The «ultimate» rectors’ positions corresponding to these poles are analyzed including the features of the ontological framework, priorities and goals, «operation spaces» and management tools used. It is shown that the designated space contains a whole range of rectors’ positions, as implemented through different management styles. The following rector’s positions are characterized: «Functionary», «Leader», «Investor», «Manager», «Entrepreneur». The formation of the rector’s position as an important part of his professional development is discussed.

The proposed typology of positions is based on the experience of the authors as participants in developing programs and flagship projects of universities, on the experience of professional communication with more than 30 rectors of Russian universities.

The article is original and new, as it puts forward the concepts of «a rector’s position» and «rector’s positions space». These concepts and the typology of the distinguished positions can be used as a tool for analyzing the rectors’ activity positions, for comprehending the imperatives and limitations inherent in these positions. The position scheme and the «operation space» scheme can serve as guidelines for analysing and assessing the completeness (or partiality) of the university leader’s position. These schemes can be also used in management consulting and as an element of educational programs for university rectors and management teams.

1. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Kognitivnyi universitet: kontury budushchego [Cognitive University: the Contours of the Future]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2014, no. 6 (94), pp. 18–29. (In Russ.).

2. Barnett R. Osmyslenie universiteta [Realizing the University]. In: M. A. Gusakovskii, A. A. Polonnikov, M. Korbut (eds.). Teoreticheskie voprosy obrazovaniya [Theoretical Issues of Education], Minsk, 2013, pp. 5–30. (In Russ.).

3. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Universitet 4.0: filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz [University 4.0: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2017, no. 1, pp. 16–29. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.01.002. (In Russ.).

4. Mamardashvili M. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya [Cartesian Reflections], Moscow, Progress; Kul’tura, 1993, 352 p. (In Russ.).

5. Shchedrovitskii G. P. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works], Moscow, Shkola Kulturnoi Politiki, 1995, 800 p. (In Russ.).

6. Elkonin B. D. Vvedenie v psikhologiy u razvitiia (v t raditsii kul’turno-istoricheskoi teorii L. S. Vygotskogo) [Introduction to the Developmental Psychology (Traditions of Cultural and Historical Theory)], Moscow, Trivola, 1994, 168 p. (In Russ.).

7. Bakhtin M. M. K filosofii postupka [The Philosophy of the Act]. In: Filosofiia i sotsiologiia nauki i tekhniki, Moscow, 1986, pp. 80–160. (In Russ.).

8. Genisaretskii O. I. Kulturno-antropologicheskaya perspektiva [Cultural and Anthropological Perspective]. In: Inoe. Khrestomatiia novogo rossiiskogo samosoznaniia, available at: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/inoe/genis.htm (accessed 31.01.2020). (In Russ.).

9. Foucault M. Germenevtika sub’ekta: Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981–1982 uchebnom godu [Hermeneutics of the Subject: A Course of Lectures Delivered at the Collège de France in the Academic Year 1981–1982], Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 2007, 677 p. (In Russ.).

10. Smirnov S. A. Chertov most. Vvedenie v antropologiyu perekhoda [Devil’s Bridge. Introduction to the Anthropology of Transition], Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, 2010, 491 p. (In Russ.).

11. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Tsifrovizatsiya v sisteme prioritetov razvitiya rossiiskikh universitetov: ekspertnyi vzglyad [Digitalization in the System of Priorities for the Development of Russian Universities: an Expert View]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2018, vol. 22, no. 4 (116), pp. 52–67. DOI: 10.15826/ umpa.2018.04.040. (In Russ.).

12. Mrdulyash P. B. Proektirovanie razvitiya v formate strategicheskikh sessii [The Practice of Development Planning in the Format of Strategic Sessions]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2019, no. 23 (1/2), pp. 155–164. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.01–2.013. (In Russ.).

13. Mrdulyash P. B. Organizatsiya i vedenie strategicheskikh sessii [Strategic Sessions Organization and Conduction]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2019, no. 23 (4), pp. 132–141. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.04.034. (In Russ.).

14. Kuzminov Ya. I. Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki: missiya i mekhanizmy ee realizatsii [Higher School of Economics: Mission and Mechanisms for its Implementation]. In: Ya. I. Kuzminov (ed.). Universitetskie innovatsii: opyt Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [University Innovations: Experience of the Higher School of Economics], Moscow, 2006, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).

15. Jaspers K. Ideya universiteta [The Idea of the University], Minsk, Belarusian State University, 2006, 159 p. (In Russ.).

16. Wissema J. G. Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009. 272 p.

17. Doroshenko S. V., Shelomentsev A. G. Predprinimatel ’skaya ekosistema v sovremennykh sotsioekonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh [The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in the Contemporary Socio-Economic Studies]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii, 2017, no. 4, pp. 212–221. (In Russ.).

18. Koryttsev M. A. Reformy vysshego obrazovaniya v kontekste politiki novogo menedzherizma [Reforms of Higher Education in the Context of New Managerialism]. Voprosy regulirovaniya ekonomiki, 2019, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 162–170. DOI: 10.17835/2078–5429.2019.10.4.162–170. (In Russ.).

19. Senge P. Pyataya distsiplina: iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchayushcheisya organizatsii [The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Self-Learning Organization], Moscow, ZAO «Olimp-Bizness», 1999, 408 p. (In Russ.).

20. Salmi J., Frumin I. D. Kak gosudarstva dobivayutsya mezhdunarodnoi konkurentosposobnosti universitetov: uroki dlya Rossii [Excellence Initiatives to Establish World-Class Universities: Evaluation of Recent Experiences]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2013, no. 1, pp. 25–68. (In Russ.).