Russian University Pro-Rectors: Sociological Portrait and Structural Changes

The article aims at studying the key features of the universities subordinate to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the basis of monitoring their pro-rectors. The study is methodologically based on the the functional, bureaucratic, and structural approaches to the organization management. The main research method is the analysis of documents and materials from the official websites of Russian universities in order to obtain analytical data on their pro-rectors’ gender, age, academic degree and rank, work experience, and activity profile. The sample totals 239 universities, which are departmentally subordinated to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. The study was conducted in 2018–2019, the results of the 2006, 2008, 2012 analysis having been taken for comparison. The results of the research presented in the article include a generalized sociological portrait of a Russian university pro-rector and an analysis of changes in the pro-rectors’ structure according to the functional areas of their activities in universities. The study has certain limitations and possible consequences concerning a number of changes, which require a systematic search and justification of ways to increase the role of university pro-rectors in building a university’s reputation. These changes might be a basis for further special studies. In accordance with the latest changes in the management system of higher education, considering the features identified in the pro-rectors’ structure according to the functional areas of their activities in universities will allow university management to focus on the most significant areas of responsibility in the university management system, and on this basis to increase the reputation and competitiveness of Russian universities. Here, this research comes to be essential, as it shows a Russian university pro-rector’s sociological portrait and today’s features of the functional areas distribution of pro-rectors’ responsibility. It is proved that a prerequisite for forming a university’s sustainable competitiveness and maintaining its reputation at a high level is pro-rectors’ more active participation in managing the functional areas of a higher educational institution’s activity.

1. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A., Shuklina E. A. Sushchestvuet li sistema vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii? [Does a System of Higher Education exist in Russia?] Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no. 11, pp. 76–86. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517110095. (In Russ.).

2. Karpov А. О. Vozmozhen li universitet 3.0 v Rossii? [Is University 3.0 Feasible in Russia?] Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018, no. 9, pp. 59–70. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250001959-7. (In Russ.).

3. Popova Е. P., Klimova А. V. Rossiiskie vuzy: organizatsionnaya spetsifika i vybor orientirov razvitiya [Russian Universities: Organizational Specifics and Development Benchmarks Choice]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2018, no. 12, pp. 63–72. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003170-0. (In Russ.).

4. Volkov A. E. Kak budet menyat’sya upravlenie universitetami [How University Management Will Change]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2019, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 6–8. (In Russ.).

5. Nizhegorodtsev R. M. and Reznik S. D. (eds.). Upravlenie izmeneniyami v vysshei shkole [Change Management in Higher Education], Мoscow, INFRA-M, 2018. DOI: 10.12737/monography_5aa8ddfdb460c5.57247275. (In Russ.).

6. Nizhegorodtsev R. M. and Reznik S. D. (eds.). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii: vyzovy vremeni i vzglyad v budushchee [Higher Education in Russia: Challenges of Time and Look into the Future], Мoscow, INFRA-M, 2020. DOI: 10.12737/1045402. (In Russ.).

7. Reznik S. D., Sazykina O. A. Zaveduyushchie kafedrami universitetov Rossii: stupeni rosta [Managers of chairs of Russian Universities: Growth Steps], Мoscow, INFRA-M, 2016, 193 p. (In Russ.)

8. Makeeva A. V Rossii otchislili polovinu vuzov. Za tri goda prekratili sushchestvovaniye boleye tysyachi uchebnykh zavedeniy [Russia Expelled Half of the Universities. In Three Years, More than a Thousand Educational Institutions Ceased to Exist]. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3540086 (accessed 23.12.2018). (In Russ.).

9. Reznik S. D., Sazykina O. A., Fomin G. B. Komanda rektora: evolyutsiya izmenenii struktury i soderzhaniya deyatel’nosti prorektorov rossiiskikh vuzov [Rector’s Team: Evolution of Content and Structure’s Changes of Pro-Rector’s Activities of Russian Universities]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2012, no. 3 (79), pp. 74–80. (In Russ.).

10. Subanov T. T. Znachenie sistemy postroeniya effektivnoi komandy v povyshenii upravlencheskikh navykov rukovoditelei obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdenii [Тhe Importance of the System of the Efficient Team Building in Increasing Management Skill of Leaders of Educational Institutions]. In: I. A. Simonova, M. S. Krivoshchekova, P. V. Kropotukhina, E. M. Alekseeva (eds.), Molodezh’ v XXI veke: filosofiya, psikhologiya pravo, pedagogika, ekonomika i menedzhment: sbornik nauchnykh statei VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Youth in the 21st Century: Philosophy, Psychology, Law, Pedagogy, Economics and Management: Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference], Yekaterinburg, 2016, pp. 140–141. (In Russ.).

11. Hunter F. Training Administrative Staff to Become Key Players in the Internationalization of Higher Education. International Higher Education, 2018, vol. 92, pp. 16–17. DOI: 10.6017/ihe.2018.92.10280 (In Eng.).

12. Duncan D. Valuing Professional, Managerial and Administrative Staff in HE. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2014, iss. 2, vol. 18, pp. 38–42. DOI: 10.1080/13603108.2014.882427. (In Eng.).

13. Endovitskiy D. A., Bubnov Yu. A., Gaidar K. M. Vliyanie lichnosti vuzovskogo lidera na effektivnost’ deyatel’nosti universiteta [An Effect of University Leader’s Confidence on the Effectiveness of a University]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2017, no. 11, pp. 79–88. (In Russ.).

14. Reznik S. D., Makarova S. N., Sazykina O. A. Gendernaya asimmetriya v upravlencheskoi srede rossiiskikh universitetov [Gender Asymmetry in the Management of Russian Universities]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya, 2017, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 94–109. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.086.021.201701.94-109. (In Russ.).

15. Maykova S. E., Okunev D. V., Salimova T. A., S oldatova E . V. Modelirovanie organizatsion noi struktur y upravleniya ob»edinennym universitetom [Modeli ng O rga n isat ional Ma nagement Structure of the United University]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya, 2017, vol. 21, no. 3 (88), pp. 421–440. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.088.021.201703.421-440. (In Russ.).

16. Bashmakov D. V. Sanktsioniruyushchie resheniya v proektakh setevogo vzaimodeistviya v sfere vysshego obrazovaniya [Authorizing Decisions in Projects of Network Interaction in Higher Education]. Upravlenets, 2018, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 102–107. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-4-11. (In Russ.).

17. Ponarina E. Kakim stanet zavtra? Universitety lovyat vetry peremen [What will be Tomorrow? Universities Catch Winds of Change]. Poisk, 2019, no. 13, p. 5. (In Russ.).

18. Reznik S. D., Fomin G. B., Sazykina O. A. Rektory Rossii: sistema i mekhanizmy professional’nogo stanovleniya [Rectors of Russia: the System and Mechanisms of Professional Development], Мoscow, INFRA-M, 2013, 232 p. (In Russ.).

19. Reznik S. D., Fomin G. B., Sazykina O. A., Shesternina O. I. Dekany Rossii: sotsiologicheskii portret, tekhnologii i organizatsiya deyatel’nosti [Deans of Russia: Sociological Portrait, Technology and Organization], Мoscow, INFRA-M, 2013, 204 p. (In Russ.).

20. Grinkevich Yu. V., Shabanova M. V. Programmy razvitiya administrativnykh sotrudnikov kak odin iz instrumentov dostizheniya strategicheskikh tselei universiteta [Professional Development Programmes for University Administrators as One of the Tools for Achieving University’s Strategic Goals]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2018, no. 2, pp. 64–71. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.02.017. (In Russ.).