Strategic Sessions Organization and Conduction
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.04.034
Abstract
The paper analyzes the case of organizing and conducting strategic sessions, their practice being realized over the past few years at the Moscow School of Management Skolkovo and in other projects on developing university strategies with the author’s participation. This case is important, as the strategic sessions today have a mass format, and their practice analysis often shows insufficient theoretical and methodological validity. The case presents the main elements of the methodology for conducting strategic sessions. There are shown a number of methods for providing the basic processes of such sessions – thinking and self-determination. The main element of such sessions is described in detail – that is, the formation of content. This case study is addressed to university leaders who are responsible for strategic planning, as well as to session leaders, to experts, and to consultants in this field.
About the Author
P. B. Mrdulyash
Moscow School of Management «SKOLKOVO»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel B. Mrdulyash – Professor of the Practice of the Institute for Public Strategy
100 Novaya str., Skolkovo village, Odintsovsky District, Moscow Region, 143025
References
1. Mrdulyash P. B. Proektirovanie razvitiya v formate strategicheskih sessiy. [Development Design in the format of strategic sessions], available at: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1003?fbclid=IwAR2_F5SdDVCoe4YLm4NTVOIWVvZp6_JN5C03muZKyXC-CRrMt-5bq-4I4csA. (accessed 19.08.2019). (In Russ.).
2. Popov S. V. Organizacionno-dejatel’nostnye igry – myshlenie v zone riska. [Organizational and activity gamesthinking in the risk zone], available at: http://berezkin.info/?page_id=146 (accessed 19.08.2019). (In Russ.).
3. Shhedrovickij P. G. K analizu topiki organizacionnodejatel’nostnyh igr [Analysing of topics of organizational and activity games] available at: https://shchedrovitskiy.com/kanalizu-topiki-organizacionno-deyatelnostnyh-igr/ (accessed 19.08.2019). (In Russ.).
4. Pelevin V. «Generation «П»». Moscow, Vagrius, 1999. 223 p. (In Russ.).
5. Veretennikova O. B., Drantusova N. V., Kljuev A. K., Knjazev E. A., Kortov S. V., Majdannik V. I., Malysheva L. A., Popova L. N. Pod red. E. A. Knjazeva, A. K. Kljueva. Razrabotka strategii obrazovatel’nogo uchrezhdenija. Metodicheskie rekomendacii [The Development of educational institution strategy. Methodical recommendation], Ekaterinburg, 2007. 408 p. (In Russ.).
6. Shhedrovickij G. P. Znak i dejatel’nost’. Kniga 2. Ponimanie i myshlenie. Smysl i soderzhanie. Sem’ lekcij [Sign and operation. Book 2. Understanding and thinking. Sense and content. Seven lectures], 1972, Moscow, 2006. 353 p. (In Russ.).
7. Sokolov M. M., Titaev K. D. Provincial’naja i tuzemnaja nauka. Antropologicheskij forum [Provincial and native science. Anthropological forum], 2013. № 19. pp. 239–275. available at: https://publications.hse.ru/articles/111996717 (accessed 19.08.2019). (In Russ.).
8. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. Sochinenija v shesti tomah [Works in six volumes. Vol.3], Moscow,»Mysl», 1964. 799 p. (In Russ.).
9. Pavel Mrdulyash. 2013. Tools for Visualization of the Meaning: How to Transfer the Meaning into Discourse? available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2234430. (accessed 19.08.2019). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mrdulyash P.B. Strategic Sessions Organization and Conduction. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2019;23(4):132-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.04.034
Views:
4554
Email this article 