BOLOGNA PROCESS: AREA FOR DEVELOPMENT OR A NEOLIBERAL PROJECT?
https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.024
Abstract
Introduction. The article studies various aspects of the Bologna Process discourse from the perspective of its impact on the development of higher education in recent decades. Special attention is paid to the practices of Russian universities’ participation in European Tempus and Erasmus+ projects. The aim of the article is to provide evidence of the benefits of the Bologna Process as a factor, which promotes and ensures sustainable social development by means of higher education internationalization, enhancing the experts’ interaction on the issues of higher education. Materials and methods used include comparative analysis, empiric data collection, conceptual and terminological analysis, interpretation, modeling, and problem solving. Results. The article identifies the key system factors which ensure the positive dynamics of the Bologna Process. This is substantiated by the facts of its implementation in Russia within the Tempus and Erasmus+ Projects. It also shows the actors of this process’ awareness of a need to adapt its goals and methods to complicated and rapidly changing situations. Discussion and Conclusion. The article confirms the hypothesis of the importance of the Bologna Process for the development and modernization of higher education. The theories claiming that the Bologna Process is a neoliberal endeavour are proved unsubstantial. The results presented in the article can be used in pre-service and in-service programmes and courses for higher education teachers, administrators, and researchers.
About the Authors
A. A. MuravevaRussian Federation
Anna A. Muraveva – PhD (Philology); Senior Expert; Deputy Director of the National office of the Erasmus+ Programme;
+7 (495) 97-23-590
N. M. Aksenova
Russian Federation
Natalya M. Aksenova – Deputy Director; Project Officer of the National Office of the Erasmus+ Programme
+7 (495) 97-23-590
N. Sh. Vatolkina
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Vatolkina – PhD (Economics), Associate Professor
+7 (499) 267-1731
References
1. Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Zone Books, 2015. 296 p.
2. Khmelinin A. A. Neoliberalniy dickers [The Neoliberal Discourse] // Discource. 2014. pp. 25–27. [online], available at: <: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/neoliberalnyy-diskurs (accessed 08.02.2019). (In Russ.).
3. Harvey D. Kratkaya istoriya neoliberalizma [The Brief History of Neoliberalism]. Moscow. 2007. 288 p. (In Russ.).
4. Internationalization of Higher Education. B: Structural and Cohesion Policies. Culture and Education. Study. 2015. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. [online], available at: <: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/540370/IPOL_STU(2015)540370_EN.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).
5. Evans L. Reshaping the EHEA: After the Demise of Neolibralism: A UK-Informed Perspective. Pp 23–42. B: A. Curaj et al. (eds.), European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies. 2018. [online], available at: https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/73548895/published_chapter_July_2018.pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).
6. Wright S. & Greenwood, D. Universities run for, by and with the faculty, students and staff. Alternatives to the neoliberal destruction of higher education. Learning and Teaching // The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences. vol.10, № 1, pp. 42–65. Spr 2017, available at: https:// doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2017.100104 (accessed 08.02.2019).
7. Bacon E. Neo-collegiality: restoring academic engagement in the managerial university. London: de Wit H, Hunter, F. et al. Internationalization of higher education. DirectorateGeneral for Internal Policies. 2015.
8. Neary M., Winn J. Beyond Public and Private: A Framework for Co-operative Higher Education Framework for Co-operative Higher Education Available at: < https:// olh.openlibhums.org/articles/10.16995/olh.195/[accessed 08.02.2019]
9. Halffman W., Radder H. The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University. June 2015, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s11024-015-9270-9 (accessed 08.02.2019).
10. The Auckland Declaration on the purpose of the University in the 21st Century. UNIKE: Universities in the Knowledge economy, available at: http://unike.au.dk/theauckland-declaration (accessed 08.02.2019).
11. Buckup Sebastian, 2017, The end of neoliberalism? World Economic Forum, available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/07/this-is-what-the-future-of-economic-liberalism-looks-like-its-time-to-rethink-it/ [accessed 08.02.2019]
12. Zanoni P. et al. Post-capitalistic politics in the making: The imaginary and praxis of alternative economies. Organisation. 2017, vol. 24 (5), pp. 575–588, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713219 (accessed 08.02.2019).
13. Kauppi, N. The Academic Condition: Unstable structure, ambivalent narratives, dislocated identities in B. Evans, L, Nixon J. Academic identities in higher education: The Changing European landscape. 2015. London, Bloomsbury.
14. Mason P. Postcapitalism; A guide for our future. 2015, London, Allen Lane.
15. Hibert M., Lesic-Thomas A. On wolves, sheep and shepherds: on Bosnian Comedy of Errors. In W. Halffman and H. Radder (eds) International responses to the academic manifesto: reports from 14 countries. Social epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2017, available at: https://social-epistemology.com/2017/07/13/international-responses-tothe-academic-manifesto-reports-from-14-countries-willemhalffman-and-hans-radder/ (accessed 08.02.2019).
16. Hudzik J. Comprehensive Internationalization: Institutional pathways to success Internationalization in Higher Education Series, Routledge, 2015.
17. European Higher Education in the World. European Commission (2013). European higher education in the world (COM 2013), available at: http://www.em-a.eu/fileadmin/content/Promo/Erasmus__in_the_world_layouted. pdf (accessed 08.02.2019).
18. Parizhskoe koomunike ministrov obrazovaniya stran Bolonskogo processa [Paris communiqué of the Ministers of education of the Bologna process], available at: http://erasmusplusinrussia.ru/images/erasmus-doc/ CommuniqueParis2018.pdf [accessed at 08.02.2019] (In Russ.).
19. De Wit H. Misconceptions of internationalization still prevail // University world News, July 14. 2017, available at: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post. php?story=20170711093305138 (accessed 08.02.2019)..
20. Curaj A., Deca L. Procopie R. (eds.), European higher education area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies. 2018. Vol. 1, Springer.
21. De Wit H., Deca L., Hu nter F. (2015) Internationalization of Higher Education – What Can Research Add to the Policy Debate? In: Curaj A., Matei L., Pricopie R., Salmi J., Scott P. (eds) The European Higher Education Area. Springer, Cham, available at: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_1 (accessed 12.02.2019).
22. Jones E. and de Wit, H. Globalization of Internationalization: Thematic and Regional Reflections on a Traditional Concept. AUDEM: The International Journal of Higher Education and Democracy. Vol. 3. 2012. pp. 35–54, available at: http://www.academia.edu/2489971/Globalization_ of_internationalization_Thematic_and_regional_reflections_ on_a_traditional_concept (accessed 08.02.2019).
Review
For citations:
Muraveva A.A., Aksenova N.M., Vatolkina N.Sh. BOLOGNA PROCESS: AREA FOR DEVELOPMENT OR A NEOLIBERAL PROJECT? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2019;23(3):119-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.024