THE MONITORING OF MONITORING: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MINISTRY’S NEW APPROACH TO SUPERVISION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ PERFORMANCE?
Аннотация
The article discusses the Monitoring of higher education institutions’ (HEIs’) effectiveness, which has been conducted annually by the Ministry of Education and Science in the last five years. The method of the Monitoring is based on the technology of collecting and systematizing information used by the state accreditation in 1997–2010. The reasons for the introduction of the Monitoring by the Ministry are described; the features of the performance indicators are justified by the state educational policy. A model of presentation of the Monitoring results in the league table format is suggested, which makes it possible to use its results more flexibly for the management of the higher education system. It also allows higher education institutions to analyze their positions and to form their own ways of the development.
Об авторах
V. Bolotov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Россия
Victor Bolotov – Dr. hab. (Pedagogy), Research Advisor of the Centre for Education Quality Monitoring
Россия
Victor Bolotov – Dr. hab. (Pedagogy), Research Advisor of the Centre for Education Quality Monitoring
G. Motova
National Centre for Public Accreditation
Россия
Galina Motova – Dr. hab. (Pedagogy), Deputy Director
Россия
Galina Motova – Dr. hab. (Pedagogy), Deputy Director
V. Navodnov
National Centre for Public Accreditation
Россия
Vladimir Navodnov – Dr. hab. (Engineering), Director
Россия
Vladimir Navodnov – Dr. hab. (Engineering), Director
Список литературы
1. Bergseth B., Petocz, P. and Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (2014). Ranking quality in higher education: guiding or misleading? Quality in Higher Education, 20(3), pp. 330–347
2. Billing D. (2004). International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity? Higher Education, 47(1), pp. 113–137.
3. Brennan, J. (1997). Authority, legitimacy and change: The rise of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education Management, 9 (1), pp. 7–29.
4. Decree of The President Of The Russian Federation of May 7, 2012 No 599 «About the measures of implementation of the state policy in the sphere of education and science» (2012)
5. Forrat N. (2012). Comparative-Historical Social Science (CHSS) Working Paper Series. Global Trends or Regime Survival: the Reforms in Russian Higher Education. Evanston, IL: The Buffett Institute.
6. Gks.ru. (2018). FSSS. Main. Retrieved from: http:// www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/en/ main/ [Accessed 7 Mar. 2018].
7. Gounko T., & Smale W. (2007). Modernization of Russian higher education: exploring paths of influence. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(4), pp. 533–548. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/03057920701366358
8. Heyneman S. (2010). A Comment on the Changes in Higher Education in the Former Soviet Union. European Education, 42(1), pp. 76–87. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi. org/10.2753/eue1056–4934420104
9. Indicators.miccedu.ru. (2018). Main information and computation center. Retrieved from: http://indicators.miccedu. ru/monitoring/[Accessed 7 Mar. 2018].
10. Kartavuzov.ru. (2018). Monitoring of the system of education. Retrieved from: http://kartavuzov.ru [accessed 7 Mar. 2018].
11. Marshall S. (2016). Quality as sense-making. Quality in Higher Education, 22(3), pp. 213–227.
12. Motova G. and Pykkö R. (2012). Russian Higher Education and European Standards of Quality Assurance. European Journal of Education, 47(1), pp. 25–36.
13. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 30.12.2012 No 2620-р and the plan of activities («Roadmap») of the changes in social sphere aimed at the enhancement of education and science effectiveness (2012).
14. Pukharenko Y., Norina N., & Norin V. (2017). Russian engineering education in the era of change. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(2), pp. 171–187. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1311307
15. RF Federal Law «On Education in Russian Federation» (2012), No 273-FZ.
16. Rossiyskaya Gazeta (2012). Federalnyy zakon ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. No 273-FZ «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Federal law from 29 December 2012, No 273-FZ «On Education in the Russian Federation]. [online] Retrieved from: https://rg.ru/2012/12/30/obrazovanie-dok.html [accessed 7 Mar. 2018]. (In Russ.).
17. Rossiyskaya Gazeta (2012). Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 7 maya 2012 g. N 599 «O merakh po realizatsii gosudarstvennoy politiki v oblasti obrazovaniya i nauki» [The Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2012 № 599 «About measures to implement the state policy in the sphere of education and science»]. Retrieved from: https://rg.ru/2012/05/09/nauka-dok.html [accessed 7 Mar. 2018]. (In Russ.).
18. Rossiyskaya Gazeta (2013). Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30 dekabrya 2012 g. N 2620-r g. Moskva.[Order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 30.12.2012 N 2620-р and the plan of activities (‘Roadmap») of the changes in social sphere aimed at enhancement of education and science effectiveness.]. Retrieved from: https://rg.ru/2013/01/14/obraz-eff-site-dok.html [accessed 7 Mar. 2018]. (In Russ.).
19. Sheregi F., Arefev A., Kliucharev G., & Tiurina I. (2015). Chislennost’ obuchayushchikhsya, pedagogicheskogo i professorsko-prepodavatel’skogo personala, chislo obrazovatel’nykh organizatsiy Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (Prognoz do 2020 goda i otsenka tendentsiy do 2030 goda). [Number of students, number of the teaching staff, and number of educational institutions in the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 270 p. (In Russ.).
20. Van Vught F. and Westerheijden D. (2010). Multidimensional ranking. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), pp. 1–26.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Bolotov V., Motova G., Navodnov V. THE MONITORING OF MONITORING: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MINISTRY’S NEW APPROACH TO SUPERVISION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ PERFORMANCE? Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2019;23(3):5-13. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.015
For citation:
Bolotov V., Motova G., Navodnov V. THE MONITORING OF MONITORING: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MINISTRY’S NEW APPROACH TO SUPERVISION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ PERFORMANCE? University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2019;23(3):5-13. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.015
Просмотров: 773
Послать статью по эл. почте 