umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2025.03.017umj-2116Research ArticleСТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТАМИSTRATEGIC UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENTНаучно-производственная кооперация и ее государственная поддержка: взгляд российского бизнесаResearch and Production Cooperation and its State Support: the View of Russian Businesshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-9267ГершманМ. А.GershmanM. A.

Гершман Михаил Анатольевич – кандидат экономических наук, директор Центра научно-технической, инновационной и информационной политики Института статистических исследований и экономики знаний 

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Mikhail A. Gershman – PhD (Economics), Director of Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Policy, Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge

20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

mgershman@hse.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3544-7219ГохбергЛ. М.GokhbergL. M.

Гохберг Леонид Маркович – доктор экономических наук, первый проректор, директор Института статистических исследований и экономики знаний

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Leonid M. Gokhberg – Dr. hab (Economics), First Vice Rector, Director of Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge

20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

lgokhberg@hse.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-612XЕвсееваМ. В.EvseevaM. V.

Евсеева Марина Викторовна – кандидат экономических наук, ведущий эксперт Центра научно-технической, инновационной и информационной политики Института статистических исследований и экономики знаний

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Marina V. Evseeva – PhD (Economics), Leading Expert of Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Policy, Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge

20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

mvevseeva@hse.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-9564-6181КаменеваЕ. Г.KamenevaE. G.

Каменева Елена Геннадьевна – младший научный сотрудник Центра научно-технической, инновационной и информационной политики Института статистических исследований и экономики знаний 

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Elena G. Kameneva – Junior Research Fellow of Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Policy, Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge

20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

ekameneva@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation202514122025293521Copyright © Гершман М.А., Гохберг Л.М., Евсеева М.В., Каменева Е.Г., 20252025Гершман М.А., Гохберг Л.М., Евсеева М.В., Каменева Е.Г.Gershman M.A., Gokhberg L.M., Evseeva M.V., Kameneva E.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/2116

Статья посвящена выявлению типичных подходов для российских инновационно активных компаний к организации взаимодействия с вузами в сфере исследований и разработок (ИР), а также особенностей применения профильных мер государственной поддержки. Эмпирической основой исследования послужили опрос предприятий и серия экспертных интервью, проведенные в 2024–2025 гг. Установлено, что компании ориентированы преимущественно на проектный формат взаимодействия, выбирая партнера под конкретный проект. Реже распространены стратегические партнерства по расширенному спектру тематик с несколькими вузами; еще более редко встречаются институциональные формы сотрудничества, например, создание совместных тематических исследовательских центров, которое доступно в основном для крупного бизнеса. Подтверждено усиление тенденции отказа компаний от применения прямой господдержки (субсидий, грантов институтов развития), включая целевые меры поддержки научно-производственной кооперации, в пользу инструментов с минимальными издержками администрирования. Показаны различия в подходах к взаимодействию с университетами и применению профильных мер господдержки для компаний разного размера. При выборе вузов-партнеров предприятия отдают предпочтение тем, кто активно участвует в различных государственных инициативах. По их мнению, эти университеты в рамках реализации совместных проектов ИР могут предложить исследовательские компетенции и инфраструктуру мирового уровня, что позволит снизить степень риска проекта и компенсировать недостаток ресурсов компании. Это повышает уверенность предприятий в решении прикладных научных задач и стимулирует рост затрат на ИР.

The article explores typical approaches employed by Russian innovation-active companies to organize cooperation with universities in the fi eld of research and development (R&D), as well as the specifi c features of applying relevant state support measures. The empirical basis of the study consists of a survey of enterprises and a series of expert interviews conducted in 2024–2025. The fi ndings indicate that companies predominantly rely on a project-based format of collaboration, selecting partners for specifi c projects. Strategic partnerships covering a broader range of topics with several universities are less common, while institutional forms of cooperation—such as the establishment of joint thematic research centers—remain rare and are primarily characteristic of large enterprises. The study confi rms a growing trend among companies to abandon direct state support instruments (such as subsidies or grants from development institutions), including targeted measures for research and production cooperation, in favor of tools with minimal administrative costs. The analysis reveals diff erences in approaches to university collaboration and the use of support mechanisms among companies of various sizes. When selecting partner universities, enterprises tend to prefer those actively engaged in state programs and initiatives. According to business representatives, such universities possess world-class research competencies and infrastructure, which help reduce project risks and compensate for the company’s limited internal resources. This, in turn, strengthens corporate confi dence in addressing applied scientifi c problems and stimulates growth in R&D expenditures.

научно-производственная кооперациягосударственная поддержкаинвестиции в исследования и разработкироссийские компанииresearch and production cooperationstate supportinvestment in research and developmentRussian companiesСтатья подготовлена в рамках Программы фундаментальных исследований Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики».The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program of the HSE University.ReferencesTerán-Bustamante A., Martínez-Velasco A., LópezFernández A. M. University–Industry Collaboration: A Sustainable Technology Transfer Model // Administrative Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11, nr 4. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/admsci11040142.Terán-Bustamante A., Martínez-Velasco A., López-Fernández A. M. University–Industry Collaboration: A Sustainable Technology Transfer Model. Administrative Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, nr 4, pp. 1–17. doi 10.3390/admsci11040142 (In Eng.).O’Dwyer M., Filieri R., O’Malley L. Establishing Successful University–Industry Collaborations: Barriers and Enablers Deconstructed // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2023. Vol. 48, nr 3. P. 900–931. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2.O’Dwyer M., Filieri R., O’Malley L. Establishing Successful University–Industry Collaborations: Barriers and Enablers Deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2023, vol. 48, nr 3, pp. 900–931. doi 10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2 (In Eng.).University-Industry Collaboration: New Evidence and Policy Options. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2019. 120 p. DOI: 10.1787/e9c1e648-en.University-Industry Collaboration: New Evidence and Policy Options. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2019, 120 p. doi 10.1787/e9c1e648-en (In Eng.).Власова В. В., Гохберг Л. М., Грачева Г. А. и др. Индикаторы инновационной деятельности: 2025: статистический сборник. М.: ИСИЭЗ ВШЭ, 2025. 197 c. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-3027-6-97.Vlasova V. V., Gokhberg L. M., Gracheva G. A. i dr. Indikatory innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti: 2025: statisticheskiy sbornik [Indicators of Innovation: 2025: Statistical bulletin]. Moscow, ISSEK HSE, 2025, 197 p. doi 10.17323/978-5-7598-3027-6-97 (In Russ.).Дежина И. Г. Научная кооперация университетов и компаний: мнения преподавателей // Социологические исследования. 2025. Т. 5, № 5. С. 139–149. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525050124.Dezhina I. G. Nauchnaya kooperatsiya universitetov i kompaniy: mneniya prepodavateley [University-Industry research collaboration: opinions of teachers]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 2025, vol. 5, nr 5, pp. 139–149. doi 10.31857/S0132162525050124 (In Russ.).Roud V., Vlasova V. Strategies of industry-science cooperation in the Russian manufacturing sector // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2020. Vol. 45, nr 3. P. 870–907. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3.Roud V., Vlasova V. Strategies of industry-science cooperation in the Russian manufacturing sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, vol. 45, nr 3, pp. 870–907. doi 10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3 (In Eng.).Bastos E. C., Sengik A. R., Tello-Gamarra J. Fifty Years of University-Industry Collaboration: A Global Bibliometrics Overview // Science and Public Policy. 2021. Vol. 48, nr 2. P. 177–199. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scaa077.Bastos E. C., Sengik A. R., Tello-Gamarra J. Fifty Years of University-Industry Collaboration: A Global Bibliometrics Overview. Science and Public Policy, 2021, vol. 48, nr 2, pp. 177–199. doi 10.1093/scipol/scaa077 (In Eng.).Pocol C. B., Stanca L., Dabija D. C., Câmpian V., Mișcoiu S., Pop I. D. A QCA Analysis of Knowledge Co-Creation Based on University–Industry Relationships // Mathematics. 2023. Vol.11, nr 2. P. 1–19. DOI: 10.3390/math11020388.Pocol C. B., Stanca L., Dabija D. C., Câmpian V., Mișcoiu S., Pop I. D. A QCA Analysis of Knowledge Co-Creation Based on University–Industry Relationships. Mathematics, 2023, vol. 11, nr 2, pp. 1–19. doi 10.3390/math11020388 (In Eng.).Rossoni A. L., de Vasconcellos E. P. G., de Castilho Rossoni R. L. Barriers and Facilitators of University-Industry Collaboration for Research, Development and Innovation: A Systematic Review // Management Review Quarterly. 2024. Vol. 74, nr 3. P. 1841–1877. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1.Rossoni A. L., de Vasconcellos E. P. G., de Castilho Rossoni R. L. Barriers and Facilitators of University-Industry Collaboration for Research, Development and Innovation: A Systematic Review. Management Review Quarterly, 2024, vol. 74, nr 3, pp. 1841–1877. doi 10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1 (In Eng.).Costa J., Neves A. R., Reis J. Two Sides of the Same Coin. University-Industry Collaboration and Open Innovation as Enhancers of Firm Performance // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13, nr 7. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/su13073866.Costa J., Neves A. R., Reis J. Two Sides of the Same Coin. University-Industry Collaboration and Open Innovation as Enhancers of Firm Performance. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, nr 7, pp. 1–18. doi 10.3390/su13073866 (In Eng.).Mascarenhas C., Mendes T., Galvão A. R., Marques C. S., Ferreira J. J. Academic Researchers’ Motivations to Engage in University–Industry Collaboration in Cross-Border Regions // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024. Vol. 49. P. 2104-2134. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-024-10082-w.Mascarenhas C., Mendes T., Galvão A. R., Marques C. S., Ferreira J. J. Academic Researchers’ Motivations to Engage in University–Industry Collaboration in Cross-Border Regions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2024, vol. 49. pp. 2104-2134. doi 10.1007/s10961-024-10082-w (In Eng.).D’Este P., Perkmann M. Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2011. Vol. 36. P. 316–339. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.D’Este P., Perkmann M. Why Do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, vol. 36, pp. 316–339. doi 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z (In Eng.).Nast C., Llopis O., Yankova D., D’Este P. Sourcing Insights Elsewhere: The Positive Influence of Academic Engagement on Scientific Impact // Technovation. 2025. Vol. 139. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103112.13. Nast C., Llopis O., Yankova D., D’Este, P. Sourcing Insights Elsewhere: The Positive Influence of Academic Engagement on Scientific Impact. Technovation, 2025, vol. 139, pp. 1–14. doi 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103112 (In Eng.).Bamford D., Reid I., Forrester P., Dehe B., Bamford J., Papalexi M. An Empirical Investigation into UK University Industry Collaboration: The Development of an Impact Framework // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024. Vol. 49, nr 4. P. 1411–1443. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9.Bamford D., Reid I., Forrester P., Dehe B., Bamford J., Papalexi M. An Empirical Investigation into UK University-Industry Collaboration: The Development of an Impact Framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2024, vol. 49, nr 4, pp. 1411–1443. doi 10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9 (In Eng.).Perkmann M., Walsh K. The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009. Vol. 18, nr 6. P. 1033-1065. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtp015.Perkmann M., Walsh K. The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2009, vol. 18, nr 6, pp. 1033-1065. doi 10.1093/icc/dtp015 (In Eng.).Lind F., Styhre A., Aaboen L. Exploring University-Industry Collaboration in Research Centres // European Journal of Innovation Management. 2013. Vol. 16, nr 1. P. 70–91. DOI: 10.1108/14601061311292869.Lind F., Styhre A., Aaboen L. Exploring University-Industry Collaboration in Research Centres. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2013, vol. 16, nr 1, pp. 70–91. doi 10.1108/14601061311292869 (In Eng.).Ankrah S., AL-Tabbaa O. Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review // Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2015. № 31. P. 387–408. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2596018.Ankrah S., AL-Tabbaa O. Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2015, nr 31, pp. 387–408. doi 10.2139/ssrn.2596018 (In Eng.).Tereshchenko E., Salmela E., Melkko E., Phang S. K., Happonen A. Emerging Best Strategies and Capabilities for University–Industry Cooperation: Opportunities for MSMEs and Universities to Improve Collaboration. A Literature Review 2000–2023 // Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2024. Vol. 13, nr 1. P 1–45. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-024-00386-4.Tereshchenko E., Salmela E., Melkko E., Phang S. K., Happonen A. Emerging Best Strategies and Capabilities for University–Industry Cooperation: Opportunities for MSMEs and Universities to Improve Collaboration. A Literature Review 2000–2023. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2024, vol. 13, nr 1, pp. 1–45. doi 10.1186/s13731-024-00386-4 (In Eng.).Audretsch D. B., Belitski M., Caiazza, R., Phan P. Collaboration Strategies and SME Innovation Performance // Journal of Business Research. 2023. Vol. 164. P. 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114018.Audretsch D. B., Belitski M., Caiazza, R., Phan P. Collaboration Strategies and SME Innovation Performance. Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 164, pp. 1–15. (In Eng.).Alunurm R., Rõigas K., Varblane U. The Relative Significance of Higher Education–Industry Cooperation Barriers for Different Firms // Industry and Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 34, nr 6. P. 377–390. DOI: 10.1177/0950422220909737.Alunurm R., Rõigas K., Varblane U. The Relative Significance of Higher Education–Industry Cooperation Barriers for Different Firms. Industry and Higher Education, 2020, vol. 34, nr 6, pp. 377–390. doi 10.1177/0950422220909737 (In Eng.).Шульгин Д. Б., Кортов С. В., Терлыга Н. Г. Опыт формирования системы управления интеллектуальной собственностью в УрФУ // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2016. № 2 (102). С. 72–83. DOI: 10.15826/umj.2016.102.006.Shulgin D. B., Kortov S. V., Terlyga N. G. Opyt formirovaniya sistemy upravleniya intellektual’noy sobstvennost’yu v UrFU [The experience of forming intellectual property management system at URFU]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 2016, nr 2 (102), pp. 72–83. doi 10.15826/umj.2016.102.006. (In Russ.).Malherbe C., Schutte C. S., Verhoef G., Meyer P., Doubell T. Suitable Contract Instruments and Intellectual Property Valuation Methodologies for Industry-University Collaboration // Industry and Higher Education. 2024. Vol. 38, nr 2. P. 150–163. DOI: 0.1108/14601061311292869.Malherbe C., Schutte C. S., Verhoef G., Meyer P., Doubell T. Suitable Contract Instruments and Intellectual Property Valuation Methodologies for Industry-University Collaboration. Industry and Higher Education, 2024, vol. 38, nr 2, pp. 150–163. doi 0.1108/14601061311292869 (In Eng.).Клюев А. К. Университеты и бизнес: перспективы развития диффузных структур и процессов // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2018. Т. 22, № 6 (118). С. 72–80. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2018.06.059.Klyuev A. K. Universitety i biznes: perspektivy razvitiya diffuznykh struktur i protsessov [University and business: Prospects of development of diffused structures and processes]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 2018, vol. 22, nr 6 (118), pp. 72–80. doi 10.15826/umpa.2018.06.059 (In Russ.).Усманов М. Р., Шушкин М. А., Назаров М. Г., Крылов П. А. Барьеры, препятствующие эффективному взаимодействию российских университетов и бизнес-компаний // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2021. Т. 25, № 1. С. 83–93. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2021.01.006.Usmanov M. R., Shushkin M. A., Nazarov M. G., Krylov P. A. Bar’yery, prepyatstvuyushchiye effektivnomu vzaimodeystviyu rossiyskikh universitetov i biznes-kompaniy [Barriers to effective interaction of Russian universities and companies]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 2021, nr 25 (1), pp. 83–93. doi 10.15826/umpa.2021.01.006 (In Russ.).Заиченко С., Рудь В., Кузнецова Т. Особенности взаимодействия российских предприятий и научных организаций в инновационной сфере // Форсайт. 2014. Т. 8, № 1. С. 6–22.Zaichenko S., Rud’ V., Kuznetsova T. Osobennosti vzaimodeistviya rossiiskikh predpriyatii i nauchnykh organizatsii v innovatsionnoi sfere [Interaction features between Russian enterprises and research organizations in the field of innovation]. Forsait, 2014, vol. 8, nr 1, pp. 6–22. (In Russ.).Крылов П. А. Проблема трансфера технологий от науки в бизнес // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6. Экономика. 2021. № 3. С. 220–239. DOI: 10.38050/013001052021310.Krylov P. A. Problema transfera tekhnologiy ot nauki v biznes [The problem of technology transfer from science to business]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika, 2021, nr 3, pp. 220–239. doi 10.38050/013001052021310 (In Russ.).Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix UniversityIndustry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development // EASST Review. 1995. Vol. 14. P. 14–19.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 14–19. (In Eng.).Song Y., Sahut J. M., Zhang Z., Tian Y., Hikkerova L. The Effects of Government Subsidies on the Sustainable Innovation of University-Industry Collaboration // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022. Vol. 174. P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121233.Song Y., Sahut J. M., Zhang Z., Tian Y., & Hikkerova L. The Effects of Government Subsidies on the Sustainable Innovation of University-Industry Collaboration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, vol. 174, pp. 1–11. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121233 (In Eng.).Cheng H., Zhang Z., Mvondo J. M. N. Government Support, Different Types of Collaborative R&D Input, and Performance: Evidence from China // International Journal of Technology Management. 2022. Vol. 88, nr 1. P. 51–70. DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2022.121455.Cheng H., Zhang Z., Mvondo J. M. N. Government Support, Different Types of Collaborative R&D Input, and Performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Technology Management, 2022, vol. 88, iss. 1, pp. 51–70. doi 10.1504/ijtm.2022.121455 (In Eng.).Gokhberg L., Gershman M., Zaichenko S., Meissner D. Knowledge Triangle Governance in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy // The Knowledge Triangle: Changing Higher Education and Research Management Paradigms. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. P. 229–247. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81346-8_12.Gokhberg L., Gershman M., Zaichenko S., Meissner D. Knowledge Triangle Governance in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. In: The Knowledge Triangle: Changing Higher Education and Research Management Paradigms. Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 229–247. doi 10.1007/978-3-030-81346-8_12 (In Eng.).Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society // Industry & Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 27, nr 3. P. 237–262. DOI: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 2013, vol. 27, nr 3, pp. 237–262. doi 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 (In Eng.).Kleine M., Heite J., Huber L. R. Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation performance // Research Policy. 2022. Vol. 51, nr 6. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515.Kleine M., Heite J., Huber L. R. Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation performance. Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, nr 6. doi 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515 (In Eng.).Szücs F. Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation // Research Policy. 2018. Vol. 47, nr 7. P. 1256–1266. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009.Szücs F. Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 2018, vol. 47, nr 7, pp. 1256–1266. doi 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009 (In Eng.).Kim S., Park K. C. Government Funded R&D Collaboration and It’s Impact on SME’s Business Performance // Journal of Informetrics. 2021. Vol. 15, nr 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101197.Kim S., Park K. C. Government Funded R&D Collaboration and It’s Impact on SME’s Business Performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2021, vol. 15, nr 3. doi 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101197 (In Eng.).Nugent A., Chan H. F., Dulleck U. Government funding of university-industry collaboration: Exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity // Scientometrics. 2022. Vol. 127, nr 1. P. 29–73. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04153-0.Nugent A., Chan H. F., Dulleck U. Government funding of university-industry collaboration: Exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity. Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, nr 1, pp. 29–73. doi 10.1007/s11192-021-04153-0 (In Eng.).Göksidan H. T., Erdil E., Çakmur B. Catching-up and the role of university-industry collaboration in emerging economies: Case of Turkey // Innovation and the Entrepreneurial University. 2018. P. 83–113. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62649-9_5.Göksidan H. T., Erdil E., Çakmur B. Catching-up and the role of university-industry collaboration in emerging economies: Case of Turkey. Innovation and the Entrepreneurial University, 2018, pp. 83–113. doi 10.1007/978-3-319-62649-9_5 (In Eng.).Malik K., Bashir T., Ali T. M. University-industry collaborations in Pakistan: current challenges and future opportunities // Foresight. 2021. Vol. 23, nr 4. P. 496-508. DOI: 10.1108/fs-12-2020-0133.Malik K., Bashir T., Ali T. M. University-industry collaborations in Pakistan: current challenges and future opportunities. Foresight, 2021, vol. 23, nr 4, pp. 496–508. doi 10.1108/fs-12-2020-0133 (In Eng.).Hsu D. H., Hsu P. H., Zhou K., Zhou T. Industry-University Collaboration and Commercializing Chinese Corporate Innovation // Management Science. 2024. Vol. 71, nr 6. P. 5351–5375. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3871101.Hsu D. H., Hsu P. H., Zhou K., Zhou T. Industry-University Collaboration and Commercializing Chinese Corporate Innovation. Management Science, 2024, vol. 71, nr 6, pp. 5351–5375. doi 10.2139/ssrn.3871101 (In Eng.).Гершман М. А., Евсеева М. В., Каменева Е. Г., Лапочкина В. В. Субсидирование научно-производственной кооперации в России: оценка эффектов // Вопросы экономики. 2025. № 3. C. 48–75. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-3-48-75.Gershman M. A., Evseeva M. V., Kameneva E. G., Lapochkina V. V. Subsidirovaniye nauchno-proizvodstvennoy kooperatsii v Rossii: otsenka effektov [Impact assessment of subsidized academia-industry cooperation in Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2025, nr 3, pp. 48–75. doi 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-3-48-75 (In Russ.).Гершман М. А., Стрельцова Е. А., Дранев Ю. Я. и др. Финансирование исследований и разработок для достижения национальной цели. М.: ИСИЭЗ ВШЭ, 2025. 55 c.Gershman M. A., Strel’tsova E. A., Dranev Yu. Ya. i dr. Finansirovaniye issledovaniy i razrabotok dlya dostizheniya natsional’noy tseli [Financing research and development for achieving national goals]. Moscow, ISSEK HSE University, 2025, 55 p. (In Russ.).Меликян А. В. Типология результатов сотрудничества российских вузов с бизнесом // Высшее образование в России. 2024. Т. 33, №. 11. С. 108–131. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-11-108-131.Melikyan A. V. Tipologiya rezul’tatov sotrudnichestva rossiyskikh vuzov s biznesom [Typology of results of cooperation between Russian universities and business]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii, 2024, vol. 33, nr 11. pp. 108-131. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-11-108-131 (In Russ.).Каменева Е. Г. Роль государственной поддержки в развитии научно-производственной кооперации // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2024. Т. 28, № 1. С. 71–85. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2024.01.005.Kameneva E. G. Rol’ gosudarstvennoy podderzhki razvitiya nauchno-proizvodstvennoy kooperatsii [The role of state support in the development of scientific–industrial Strategic university management-cooperation]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 2024, vol. 28, nr 1, pp. 71–85. doi 10.15826/umpa.2024.01.005 (In Russ.).Келлер А. В., Суворов Г. Н., Шадрин С. С., Коршунов И. А., Ширкова Н. Н. Передовые инженерные школы: трансфер компетенций и инноваций в интересах регионального и отраслевого развития // Высшее образование в России. 2025. Т. 34, № 2. С. 9–30. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-9-30.Keller A. V., Suvorov G. N., Shadrin S. S., Korshunov I. A., Shirkova N. N. Peredovyye inzhenernyye shkoly: transfer kompetentsiy i innovatsiy v razvitiye regional’nogo i otraslevogo razvitiya [Advanced engineering schools: transfer of competencies and innovations in the interests of regional and sectoral development]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii, 2025, vol. 34, nr 2, pp. 9–30. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-9-30 (In Russ.).Экономика знаний в терминах статистики: наука, технологии, инновации, цифровая экономика, креативная экономика, образование: Терминологический словарь / Л. М. Гохберг, Е. А. Стрельцова (рук. авт. колл.) и др.; сост. и науч. ред. Л. М. Гохберг. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2025. 297 c.Ekonomika znaniy v terminakh statistiki: nauka, tekhnologii, innovatsii, tsifrovaya ekonomika, kreativnaya ekonomika, obrazovaniye: Terminologicheskiy slovar’ [Knowledge economy in terms of statistics: science, technology, innovation, digital economy, creative economy, education: terminological dictionary]. L. M. Gokhberg, E. A. Streltsova (ruk. avt. koll.) i dr.; sost. i nauch. red. L. M. Gokhberg. Moscow, HSE University, 2025, 297 p. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.