umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2024.01.005umj-1805Research ArticleУНИВЕРСИТЕТЫ И БИЗНЕСUNIVERSITIES & BUSINESSРоль государственной поддержки в развитии научно-производственной кооперацииThe Role of State Support in the Development of Scientific-Industrial CooperationКаменеваЕ. Г.KamenevaE. G.

Каменева Елена Геннадьевна – стажер-исследователь Центра научно-технической, инновационной и информационной политики Института статистических исследований и экономики знаний 

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Elena G. Kameneva – Research Assistant, Centre for S&T, Innovation and Information Policies, Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge

20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000

 

ekameneva@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation2024210620242817185Copyright © Каменева Е.Г., 20242024Каменева Е.Г.Kameneva E.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1805

Трансфер знаний и технологий между наукой и бизнесом, а также содействие развитию научнопроизводственной кооперации являются одним из ключевых направлений государственной инновационной политики в большинстве стран мира. Вместе с тем, среди исследователей нет единого мнения о том, в какой мере государственная поддержка позволяет повысить устойчивость и результативность таких взаимодействий. В статье рассматриваются особенности развития научно-производственной кооперации в России на примере центров компетенций Национальной технологической инициативы (ЦК НТИ), создание которых является одним из инструментов государственной политики по развитию «сквозных» технологий. По итогам серии глубинных интервью с руководителями и сотрудниками ЦК НТИ выявлено, что наиболее существенные трудности для получателей государственной поддержки связаны со сложными процедурами грантового конкурса и высокими требованиями к его участникам, недостаточной длительностью бюджетного финансирования, а также ростом уровня административной нагрузки на исследователей. В текущих экономических и политических условиях ЦК НТИ также сталкиваются с рисками нехватки оборудования, материалов для исследований и высококвалифицированных кадров, что может затруднить развитие дальнейшего сотрудничества с индустриальными партнерами. На основе полученных результатов сформулированы рекомендации по совершенствованию мер поддержки ЦК НТИ, которые могут быть полезны для представителей органов власти, отвечающих за разработку и реализацию научно-технической политики.

The knowledge and technology transfer between science and business, as well as the promotion of scientificindustrial cooperation, constitute one of the key directions of state innovation policy in most countries worldwide. However, among researchers, there is no consensus on the extent to which state support can enhance the resilience and effectiveness of such interactions. This article examines the peculiarities of scientific-industrial cooperation development in Russia using the example of National Technology Initiative Competence Centers (NTI CCs), the establishment of which serves as one of the instruments of state policy for the development of “enabling” technologies. Based on a series of in-depth interviews with leaders and staff of NTI CCs, it was revealed that the most significant challenges for recipients of state support are associated with complex grant competition procedures and high requirements for participants, inadequate duration of budgetary funding, as well as an increase in the level of administrative burden on researchers. In the current economic and political conditions, NTI CCs also face risks of equipment shortages, research materials, and highly qualified personnel, which may hinder further collaboration with industrial partners. Based on the obtained results, recommendations for improving support measures for NTI CCs have been formulated, which may be useful for representatives of government bodies responsible for the development and implementation of science and technology policy.

научно-производственная кооперациягосударственная поддержкатройная спиральглубинные интервьюЦентры компетенций НТИscientific-industrial cooperationstate supporttriple helixin-depth interviewsNTI Competence CentersСтатья подготовлена в рамках Программы фундаментальных исследований Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики».The article is based on the study funded by the Basic Research Program of the HSE UniversityReferencesRoud V., Vlasova V. Strategies of Industry-Science Cooperation in the Russian Manufacturing Sector // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2020. № 45. P. 870–907. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3.Roud V., Vlasova V. Strategies of Industry-Science Cooperation in the Russian Manufacturing Sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, nr 45, pp. 870–907. doi 10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3. (In Eng.).Cantner U., Kalthaus M., Yarullina I. Outcomes of Science-Industr y Collaboration: Factors and Interdependencies // Jena Economic Research Papers. 2022. № 3. P. 2–40. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-023-09999-5.Cantner U., Kalthaus M., Yarullina I. Outcomes of Science-Industry Collaboration: Factors and Interdependencies. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2022, nr 3, pp. 2–40. doi 10.1007/s10961-023-09999-5 (In Eng.).Богачева О. В., Смородинов О. В. Критерии формирования системы государственной финансовой поддержки научных исследований и разработок с участием бизнеса // Научно-исследовательский финансовый институт. Финансовый журнал. 2019. № 2 (48). С. 37–50.Bogacheva O. V., Smorodinov O. V. Kriterii formirovaniya sistemy gosudarstvennoy f inansovoy podderzhki nauchnykh issledovaniy i razrabotok s uchastiyem biznesa [Criteria for Establishing a System of State Financial Support for Research and Development with Business Participation]. Nauchno-issledovatel’skiy finansovyy institut. Finansovyy zhurnal, 2019, nr 2 (48), pp. 37–50. (In Russ.).Sjoo K., Hellstrom T. University– Industr y Collaboration: A Literature Review and Synthesis // Industry and Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 33. Iss. 4. P. 275–285. DOI: 10.1177/0950422219829697.Sjoo K., Hellstrom T. University–Industry Collaboration: A Literature Review and Synthesis. Industry and Higher Education, 2019, vol. 33, iss. 4, pp. 275–285. doi 10.1177/0950422219829697 (In Eng.).Nsanzumuhire S., Groot W. Context Perspective on University-Industry Collaboration processes: A Systematic Review of Literature // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 258. 25 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861.Nsanzumuhire S., Groot W. Context Perspective on University-Industry Collaboration processes: A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 258, 25 p. doi 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861 (In Eng.).Xu R., Li C., Cao C., Fang M. Does Science–Industry Cooperation Policy Enhance Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms // Accounting and Finance. 2020. Vol. 61. Iss. 3. P. 3823–3853. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12717.Xu R., Li C., Cao C., Fang M. Does Science–Industry Cooperation Policy Enhance Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Accounting and Finance, 2020, vol. 61, iss. 3, pp. 3823–3853. doi 10.1111/acfi.12717 (In Eng.).Guimon J., Paunov C. Science-Industry Knowledge Exchange: A Mapping of Policy Instruments and Their Interactions // OECD STY Policy Papers. 2019. № 66. P. 3–33. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12717.Guimon J., Paunov C. Science-Industry Knowledge Exchange: A Mapping of Policy Instruments and Their Interactions. OECD STY Policy Papers, 2019, nr 66, pp. 3–33. doi 10.1111/acfi.12717 (In Eng.).Gershman M., Gokhberg L., Kuznetsova T., Roud V. Bridging S&T and Innovation in Russia: A Historical Perspective // Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2018. Vol. 133. P. 132–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.014.Gershman M., Gokhberg L., Kuznetsova T., Roud V. Bridging S&T and Innovation in Russia: A Historical Perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2018, vol. 133, pp. 132–140. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.014 (In Eng.).Dezhina I. G. Science and Innovation Policy of the Russian Government: A Variety of Instruments with Uncertain Outcomes? // Public Administration Issues. 2017. Special Issue. P. 7–26. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26.Dezhina I. G. Science and Innovation Policy of the Russian Government: A Variety of Instruments with Uncertain Outcomes? Public Administration Issues, 2017, Special Issue, pp. 7–26. doi 10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26 (In Eng.).Vlasova V. Industry-Science Cooperation and Public Policy Instruments Utilization in the Private Sector // Journal of Business Research. 2021. Vol. 124. P. 519–528. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.072.Vlasova V. Industry-Science Cooperation and Public Policy Instruments Utilization in the Private Sector. Journal of Business Research, 2021, vol. 124, pp. 519–528. doi 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.072 (In Eng.).Ankrah S., AL-Tabbaa O. Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review // Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2015. № 31. P. 387–408. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2596018.Ankrah S., AL-Tabbaa O. Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2015, nr 31, pp. 387–408. doi 10.2139/ssrn.2596018 (In Eng.).Vlasova V., Roud V. Cooperative Strategies in the Age of Open Innovation: Choice of Partners, Geography and Duration // Форсайт. 2020. Т. 14. № 4. P. 80 –94. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.80.94.Vlasova V., Roud V. Cooperative Strategies in the Age of Open Innovation: Choice of Partners, Geography and Duration. Foresight, 2020, vol. 14, nr 4, pp. 80–94. doi 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.80.94 (In Eng.).Симачев Ю. В., Кузык М. Г., Фейгина В. В. Взаимодействие российских компаний и исследовательских организаций в проведении НИОКР: третий не лишний? // Вопросы экономики. 2014. № 7. С. 4–34.Simachev Y. U. V., Kuzyk M. G., Feygina V. V. Vzaimodeystviye rossiyskikh kompaniy i issledovatel’skikh organizatsiy v skheme NIOKR: tretiy ne lishniy? [R&D Cooperation Between Russian Companies and Research Organizations: Is There a Need for State Assistance?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2014, vol. 7., pp. 4–34. (In Russ.).Chesbrough H. The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property // California Management Review. 2003. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 33–58. DOI: 10.2307/41166175.Chesbrough H. The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property. California Management Review, 2003, vol. 15, nr 3, pp. 33–58. doi 10.2307/41166175 (In Eng.).Gershman M., Roud V., Thurner T. W. Open Innovation in Russian State-Owned Enterprises // Industry and Innovation. 2019. Vol. 26. № 2. P. 199–217. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1496815.Gershman M., Roud V., Thurner T. W. Open Innovation in Russian State-Owned Enterprises. Industry and Innovation, 2019, vol. 26, nr 2, pp. 199–217. doi 10.1080/13662716.2018.1496815 (In Eng.).Hewitt-Dundas N., Roper S. Exploring Market Failures in Open Innovation // International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. 2018. Vol. 36 (1). P. 23–40. DOI: 10.1177/0266242617696347.Hewitt-Dundas N., Roper S. Exploring Market Failures in Open Innovation. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 2018, vol. 36 (1), pp. 23–40. doi 10.1177/0266242617696347 (In Eng.).Hou B., Hong J., Shi X. Efficiency of University–Industry Collaboration and Its Determinants: Evidence from Chinese Leading Universities // Industry and Innovation. 2019. P. 456–485. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1706455.Hou B., Hong J., Shi X. Efficiency of University–Industry Collaboration and Its Determinants: Evidence from Chinese Leading Universities. Industry and Innovation, 2019, pp. 456– 485. doi 10.1080/13662716.2019.1706455 (In Eng.).Гросфелд Т., Роландт Т. Дж. А. Логика открытых инноваций: создание стоимости путем объединения сетей и знаний // Форсайт. 2008. № 1 (5). С. 24–29.Grosfeld T., Rolandt T. J. A. Logika otkrytykh innovatsiy: sozdaniye stoimosti putem ob”yedineniya setey i znaniy [The Logic of Open Innovation: Creating Value by Connecting Networks and Knowledge]. Forsayt, 2008, vol. 1 (5), pp. 24–29. (In Russ.).Кузнецова Е. П. Научно-технологическая кооперация в России: современное состояние, проблемы и инструменты государственной поддержки // Вопросы территориального развития. 2019. № 1 (46). С. 1–12. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.1.46.4.Kuznetsova E. P. Nauchno-tekhnologicheskaya kooperatsiya v Rossii: sovremennoye sostoyaniye, problemy i instrumenty gosudarstvennoy podderzhki [Scientific and Technological Cooperation in Russia: Modern State, Problems and Instruments of Government Support]. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya, 2019, nr 1 (46), pp. 1–12. doi 10.15838/tdi.2019.1.46.4 (In Russ.).Aragonés-Beltrán P., Poveda-Bautista R., Jiménez-Sáez F. An In-Depth Analysis of a TTO’s Objectives Alignment Within the University Strategy: An ANP-Based Approach // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2017. № 44. P. 19–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.03.002.Aragonés-Beltrán P., Poveda-Bautista R., Jiménez-Sáez F. An In-Depth Analysis of a TTO’s Objectives Alignment Within the University Strategy: An ANP-Based Approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2017, nr 44, pp. 19–43. doi 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.03.002 (In Eng.).Симачев Ю. В., Кузык М. Г. Взаимодействие российского бизнеса с наукой: точки соприкосновения и камни преткновения // Вопросы экономики. 2021. № 6. С. 103–138.Simachev Y. V., Kuzyk M. G. Vzaimodeystviye rossiyskogo biznesa s naukoy: tochki soprikosnoveniya i kamni pretknoveniya [Interaction of Russian Business with Science: Points of Correlation and Stumbling Blocks]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2021, nr 6, pp. 103–138. (In Russ.).Bertoletti A., Johnes G. Efficiency in University-Industry Collaboration: an Analysis of UK Higher Education Institutions // Scientometrics. 2021. Vol. 126. P. 7679–7714. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04076-w.Bertoletti A., Johnes G. Efficiency in University-Industry Collaboration: an Analysis of UK Higher Education Institutions. Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, pp. 7679–7714. doi 10.1007/s11192–021–04076-w (In Eng.).Дежина И. Г., Медовников Д. С., Розмирович С. Д. Оценки спроса российского среднего технологического бизнеса на сотрудничество с вузами // Журнал новой экономической ассоциации. 2017. № 4. С. 81–105. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2017-36-4-4.Dezhina I. G., Medovnikov D. S., Rozmirovich S. D. Otsenki sprosa rossiyskogo srednego tekhnologicheskogo biznesa na sotrudnichestvo s vuzami [Estimates of the Demand of Russian Medium-Sized Technology Businesses for Cooperation with Universities]. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii, 2017, nr 4, pp. 81–105. (In Russ.).Costa J., Neves A. R., Reis J. Two Sides of the Same Coin. University-Industry Collaboration and Open Innovation as Enhancers of Firm Performance // Sustainability. 2021. № 13. P. 38–66. DOI: 10.3390/su13073866.Costa J., Neves A. R., Reis J. Two Sides of the Same Coin. University-Industry Collaboration and Open Innovation as Enhancers of Firm Performance. Sustainability, 2021, nr 13, pp. 38–66. doi 10.3390/su13073866 (In Eng.).Pujotomo D., Helmi Syed Hassan S. A., Maaram A., Sutopo W. Performance Measurement of University-Industry Collaboration in the Technology Transfer Process: A Systematic Literature Review // F1000Research. 2022. Vol. 11. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.121786.1.Pujotomo D., Helmi Syed Hassan S. A., Maaram A., Sutopo W. Performance Measurement of University-Industry Collaboration in the Technology Transfer Process: A Systematic Literature Review. F1000Research, 2022, vol. 11, pp. 1–14. doi 10.12688/f1000research.121786.1 (In Eng.).O’Reilly N. M., Robbins P. Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial University: a Perspective on the Knowledge Transfer Capabilities of Universities // Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2018. Vol. 31, nr 3. P. 243–263. DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510.O’Reilly N. M., Robbins P. Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial University: a Perspective on the Knowledge Transfer Capabilities of Universities. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 2018, vol. 31, nr 3, pp. 243–263. doi 10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510 (In Eng.).Fadeyi O., Maresova P., Stemberkova R. Perspectives of University-Industry Technology Transfer in African Emerging Economies: Evaluating the Nigerian Scenario Via a Data Envelopment Approach // Social Science. 2019. Vol. 8 (10). P. 1–20. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8100286.Fadeyi O., Maresova P., Stemberkova R. Perspectives of University-Industry Technology Transfer in African Emerging Economies: Evaluating the Nigerian Scenario Via a Data Envelopment Approach. Social Science, 2019, nr 8 (10), pp. 1–20. doi 10.3390/socsci8100286 (In Eng.).Cohen W. M. et al. Absorptive Capacity: A new Perspective on Learning and Innovation // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 35, nr 1. P. 128–152. DOI: 10.4324/9780080517889-9.Cohen W. M. et al. Absorptive Capacity: A new Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, vol. 35, nr 1, pp. 128–152. doi 10.4324/9780080517889-9 (In Eng.).Чумаченко Н. М. Парадигма открытых инноваций // Научно-практический журнал. Информационная безопасность регионов. 2017. № 1 (26). С. 55–58.Chumachenko N. M. Paradigma otkrytykh innovatsiy [Paradigm of Open Innovation]. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost’ regionov, 2017, nr 1 (26), pp. 55–58. (In Russ.).Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development // EASST Review. 1995. № 14. P. 14–19.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 1995, nr 14, pp. 14–19. (In Eng.).Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Systems: an Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society // Industry & Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 27, nr 3. P. 237–262. DOI: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple Triple Helix Systems: an Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry & Higher Education, 2013, vol. 27, nr 3, pp. 237–262. doi 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 (In Eng.).Zhang Y., Chen K., Fu X. Scientific Effects of Triple Helix Interactions Among Research Institutes, Industries and Universities // Technovation. 2019. Vol. 86. P. 33–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.05.003.Zhang Y., Chen K., Fu X. Scientific Effects of Triple Helix Interactions Among Research Institutes, Industries and Universities. Technovation, 2019, vol. 86, pp. 33–47. doi 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.05.003 (In Eng.).Abd Razak A., Rowling M., White G., Mason-Jones R. Public Sector Supply Chain Management: A Triple Helix Approach to Aligning Innovative Environmental Initiatives // Foresight and STI Governance. 2016. Vol. 10, nr 1. P. 43–52. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.43.52.Abd Razak A., Rowling M., White G., Mason-Jones R. Public Sector Supply Chain Management: A Triple Helix Approach to Aligning Innovative Environmental Initiatives. Foresight and STI Governance, 2016, vol. 10, nr 1, pp. 43–52. doi 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.1.43.52 (In Eng.).Осипова О. С., Поршнев А. В., Смельцова С. В. Университеты в инновационном развитии экономики регионов // Социально-экономические преобразования и проблемы: сб. науч. трудов. Нижний Новгород: НИСОЦ, 2019. С. 45–66.Osipova O. S., Porshnev A. V., Smeltsova S. V. Universitety v innovatsionnom razvitii ekonomiki regionov [Universities in the Innovative Development of Regional Economies]. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye preobrazovaniya i problemy, Nizhnii Novgorod, NISOTs, 2019, pp. 45–66. (In Russ.).Simoes P. C., Moreira A. C., Dias C. M. Portugal’s Changing Defense Industry: Is the Triple Helix Model of Knowledge Society Replacing State Leadership Model? // Journal of Open Innovation. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 183. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6040183.Simoes P. C., Moreira A. C., Dias C. M. Portugal’s Changing Defense Industry: Is the Triple Helix Model of Knowledge Society Replacing State Leadership Model? Journal of Open Innovation, 2020, vol. 6, p. 183. doi 10.3390/joitmc6040183 (In Eng.).Morisson A., Pattinson M. University-Industry Collaboration. Lille: Interreg Europe Policy Learning Platform, 2020. 18 p.Morisson A., Pattinson M. University-Industry Collaboration. Lille, Interreg Europe Policy Learning Platform, 2020, 18 p. (In Eng.).Соловьева Ю. В. Национальные системы трансферта технологий стран-лидеров технологического развития: региональные особенности стран Азии // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2020. № 8. С. 44–51.Solovyeva Y. V. Natsionalnyye sistemy transferta tekhnologiy stran-liderov tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya: regionalnyye osobennosti stran Azii [National Technology Transfer Systems of the Leading Technological Development Countries: Regional Features of Asian Countries]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya, 2020, nr 8., pp. 44–51. (In Russ.).Cunningham P., Gök A. The Impact and Effectiveness of Policies to Support Collaboration for R&D and Innovation // Nesta Working Paper. 2012. Vol. 12. 53 p. DOI: 10.22163/fteval.2012.87.Cunningham P., Gök A. The Impact and Effectiveness of Policies to Support Collaboration for R&D and Innovation. Nesta Working Paper, 2012, nr 12, 53 p. doi 10.22163/fteval.2012.87 (In Eng.).Kleine M., Heite J., Huber L. R. Subsidized R&D Collaboration: The Causal Effect of Innovation Vouchers on Innovation Outcomes // Research Policy. 2022. Vol. 51, nr 6. 25 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515.Kleine M., Heite J., Huber L. R. Subsidized R&D Collaboration: The Causal Effect of Innovation Vouchers on Innovation Outcomes. Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, nr 6, 25 p. doi 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515 (In Eng.).Welsh R., Glenna L., Lacy W., Biscotti D. Close Enough but not Too Far: Assessing the Effects of University–Industry Research Relationships and the Rise of Academic Capitalism // Research Policy. 2008. Vol. 37. P. 1854–1856. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515.Welsh R., Glenna L., Lacy W., Biscotti D. Close Enough but not Too Far: Assessing the Effects of University–Industry Research Relationships and the Rise of Academic Capitalism. Research Policy, 2008, nr 37, pp. 1854–1856. doi 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515 (In Eng.).Самоволева С. А. Проблемы формирования национальной инновационной системы: возможности и ограничения взаимодействия бизнеса и науки // Проблемы инновационного развития. 2019. Т. 1, № 2. С. 70–89.Samovoleva S. A. Problemy natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya vzaimodeystviya biznesa i nauki [Challenges for Development National Innovation Systems: The Possibilities and Limitations of Business and Science Cooperation]. Problemy innovatsionnogo formirovaniya razvitiya, 2019, vol. 1, nr 2, pp. 70–89. (In Russ.).Фонотов А. Г. Роль коммуникаций в развитии национальной инновационной системы // Экономика и математические методы. 2020. Т. 56, № 3. С. 35–44.Fonotov A. G. Rol’ kommunikatsiy v razvitii natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [The role of Communications in the Development of a National Innovation System]. Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody, 2020, vol. 56, nr 3, pp. 35–44. (In Russ.).Gibson E., Daim T. U., Dabic M. Evaluating University Industry Collaborative Research Centers // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 146. P. 181–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.014.Gibson E., Daim T. U., Dabic M. Evaluating University Industry Collaborative Research Centers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 146, pp. 181–202. doi 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.014 (In Eng.).Langfeldt L., Borlaug S. B., Ramberg I. Swiss National Centres of Competence in Research (NCCR): Report. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education, 2021. 88 p.Langfeldt L., Borlaug S. B., Ramberg I. Swiss National Centres of Competence in Research (NCCR): Report. Oslo, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education, 2021, 88 p. (In Eng.).Schröder S. et al. Research Performance and Evaluation – Empirical Results from Collaborative Research Centers and Clusters of Excellence in Germany // Research Evaluation. 2014. Vol. 23, nr 3. P. 221–232. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvu010.Schröder S. et al. Research Performance and Evaluation – Empirical Results from Collaborative Research Centers and Clusters of Excellence in Germany. Research Evaluation, 2014, vol. 23, nr 3, pp. 221–232. doi 10.1093/reseval/rvu010 (In Eng.).Terziev V., Bogdanova M. Strategic and Financial Frame of Intervention – Centers of Excellence and Centers of Competence // IJASOS – International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 5, nr 13. DOI: 10.18769/ijasos.531381.Terziev V., Bogdanova M. Strategic and Financial Frame of Intervention – Centers of Excellence and Centers of Competence. IJASOS – International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 5, nr 13. doi 10.18769/ijasos.531381 (In Eng.).Кинзябулатова Г. И. Интеграция науки и предпринимательства как фактор развития инновационного потенциала России // Вестник Астраханского государственного технического университета. Серия: Экономика. 2022. № 1. С. 84–93. DOI: 10.24143/2073-5537-2022-1-84-93.Kinzyabulatova G. I. Integratsiya nauki i predprinimatel’stva kak faktor razvitiya innovatsionnogo potentsiala Rossii [Integration of Science and Entrepreneurship as a Factor in the Development of Russian Innovative Potential]. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2022, nr 1, pp. 84–93. doi 10.24143/2073-5537-2022-1-84-93 (In Russ.).Мазилов Е. А. Проблемы развития кадрового потенциала российской науки: региональный аспект // Проблемы развития территории. 2021. Т. 25, № 5. С. 7–20. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.5.115.1.Mazilov E. A. Problemy razvitiya kadrovogo potentsiala rossiyskoy nauki: regional’nyy aspekt [Problems of Developing Personnel Potential of Russian Science: Regional Aspect]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, 2021, vol. 25, nr 5, pp. 7–20. doi 10.15838/ptd.2021.5.115.1 (In Russ.).Бредихин С. В., Власова В. В., Гершман М. А. и др. Деловой климат в российской науке – Doing Science. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2019. 212 с.Bredikhin S. V., Vlasova V. V., Gershman M. A. i dr. Delovoy klimat v rossiyskoy nauke [Business Climate in Russian Science]. Moscow, HSE University, 2019, 212 p. (In Russ.).Гохберг Л. М., Гершман М. А., Лапочкина В. В. Делаем науку в России: деловой климат в сфере науки и технологий. М.: ИСИЭЗ ВШЭ, 2023. 200 с.Gokhberg L. M., Gershman M. A., Lapochkina V. V. Delayem nauku v Rossii: delovoy klimat v sfere nauki i tekhnologiy [Doing Science in Russia: Business Climate in Science and Technology]. Moscow, HSE University, 2023, 200 p. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.