umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2022.02.009umj-1502Research ArticleСТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ УНИВЕРСИТЕТАМИSTRATEGIC UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENTУниверситет как участник региональной инновационной экосистемы: типология базовых стратегий поведенияThe University as a Participant of the Regional Innovation Ecosystem: A Typology of Basic Behavioral Strategieshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-4008АкбердинаВ. В.AkberdinaV. V.

Акбердина Виктория Викторовна – доктор экономических наук, профессор, член-корреспондент РАН

620014, Екатеринбург, ул. Московская, 29

Viktoria V. Akberdina – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences

29 Moskovskaya str., Yekaterinburg, 620014

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-2185ВасиленкоЕ. В.VasilenkoE. V.

Василенко Елизавета Валерьевна – аспирант, младший научный сотрудник Центра структурной политики

620014, Екатеринбург, ул. Московская, 29

Elizaveta V. Vasilenko – Graduate Student, Junior Researcher of Centre for Structural Policy Research

29 Moskovskaya str., Yekaterinburg, 620014

Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наукРоссияInstitute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202225102022262926Copyright © Акбердина В.В., Василенко Е.В., 20222022Акбердина В.В., Василенко Е.В.Akberdina V.V., Vasilenko E.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1502

Статья носит исследовательский характер и основана на анализе зарубежных работ, посвященных университетам как участникам региональных инновационных экосистем. Целью статьи является разработка типологии базовых стратегий поведения вузов. Авторы анализируют кейсы различных университетов, предпринимающих попытки трансформации своего поведения в соответствии с логикой экосистемного подхода. Работа вносит вклад в литературу по региональным инновационным экосистемам и изменяющейся роли университетов благодаря авторской типологии стратегий их поведения вузов как участников региональных инновационных экосистем: пассивных, нейтральных, активных. Эти типы декомпозируются на семь базовых стратегий поведения, определяемых степенью включенности университетов в инновационные процессы в регионе, их внутренней и внешней средами, а также целями и задачами, стоящими перед учебными заведениями. Стратегии различаются по пяти параметрам: социо-экономический контекст, стимулы для трансформации, структура экосистемы, роли основных участников, цели и функции университета. Данные параметры являются производными от комплекса подходов, которые синтезирует в себе «зонтичная концепция» региональных инновационных экосистем: стейкхолдерский подход, концепция открытых инноваций, теория агентских отношений, трансформационный подход, концепция трехзвенной спирали инноваций и концепция четырехзвенной спирали инноваций. Статья может быть интересна исследователям, изучающим проблемы экономического и инновационного развития регионов и трансформации современной системывысшего образования в мире и России. Также статья будет интересна менеджерам университетов, представителям региональной власти и бизнесменам, нацеленным на сотрудничество с ВУЗами. Благодарности. Статья подготовлена в рамках государственного задания Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации для Института экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук.

This research is based on studying foreign works devoted to universities as participants of regional innovation ecosystems. The purpose of the article is to typologize basic strategies of universities’ behavior. The authors analyze the cases of various universities attempting to transform their behavior in accordance with the logic of the ecosystem approach. The authors’ typology of universities’ behavior strategies (passive, neutral, active) contributes to the literature on regional innovation ecosystems and the universities’ changing role in them. These three types are further subdivided into seven basic strategies of universities’ behavior according to the degree of their involvement in regional innovation processes, according to the internal and external environments of the university, as well as to the goals and objectives facing them. These strategies differ in five parameters: social and economic context, incentives for transformation, ecosystem structure, key participants’ roles, university’s goals and functions. The parameters are derived from a set of approaches synthesized by the «umbrella concept» of regional innovation ecosystems: the stakeholder approach, the concept of open innovations, the theory of agency relations, the transformational approach, the triple helix model and the quadruple helix model of innovation. The article might be of interest for those researchers who study the problems of regions’ economic and innovative development and the transformations of the modern higher education system in the world and in Russia. Of no less interest might it be for university managers, for representatives of regional authorities, and for businessmen aimed at cooperation with universities.

университетэкосистемный подходэкосистемарегиональная инновационная экосистематипологиястратегии поведенияuniversityecosystem approachecosystemregional innovational ecosystemtypologybehavior strategiesReferencesBramwell A., Wolfe A., Hepburn N. Growing entrepreneurial ecosystems: Public intermediaries, policy learning, and regional innovation // Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. 2019. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 272– 292. DOI 10.1108/JEPP-04-2019-0034.Bramwell A., Wolfe A., Hepburn N. Growing Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Public Intermediaries, Policy Learning, and Regional Innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 2019, vol. 8, nr 2, pp. 272–292. doi 10.1108/JEPP-04-2019-0034. (In Eng.).Viitanen J. Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge // Technology Innovation Management Review. 2016. Vol. 6. № 12. P. 6–25.Viitanen J. Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2016, vol. 6, nr 12, pp. 6–25. (In Eng.).Pidorycheva I., Shevtsova H., Antonyuk V., Shvets N. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional Innovation Ecosystems // European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 626–640. DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626.Pidorycheva I., Shevtsova H., Antonyuk V., Shvets N. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional Innovation Ecosystems. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2020, vol. 9, nr 3, pp. 626–640. doi 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626. (In Eng.).Rong K., Lin Y., Yu J., Zhang Y., Radziwon A. Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: an empirical study in China // Industry and innovation. 2020. Vol. 28. № 5. P. 545–569. DOI 10.1080/13662716.2020.1830042.Rong K., Lin Y., Yu J., Zhang Y., Radziwon A. Exploring Regional Innovation Ecosystems: An Empirical Study in China. Industry and Innovation, 2020, vol. 28, nr 5, pp. 545–569. doi 10.1080/13662716.2020.1830042. (In Eng.).Васецкая Н. О., Боуш Г. Д., Глухов В. В. Систематизация разновидностей университетов в экономике с помощью категориального метода «Ряд информационных критериев» // Вестник Омского университета. Сер. «Экономика». 2019. Т. 17. № 3. С. 29–38. DOI 10.25513/1812–3988.2019.17(3).29–38.Vasetskaya N. O., Boush G. D., Gloukhov V. V. Sistematizatsiya raznovidnostei universitetov v ekonomike s pomoshch’yu kategorial’nogo metoda «Ryad informatsionnykh kriteriev» [Systematization of Varieties of Universities in the Economy Using the Categorical Method «A Number of Information Criteria»]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2019, vol. 17, nr 3, pp. 29– 38. doi 10.25513/1812–3988.2019.17(3).29–38. (In Russ.).Howells J., Ramlogan R., Cheng S-L. The Role, Context and Typology of Universities and Higher Education Institutions in Innovation Systems: A UK Perspective // MIoIR Discussion Paper. Manchester: University of Manchester, 2008. URL: https://ewds.strath.ac.uk/Portals/8/typology.doc (дата обращения: 21.07.2022).Howells J., Ramlogan R., Cheng S.-L. The Role, Context and Typology of Universities and Higher Education Institutions in Innovation Systems: A UK Perspective, available at: https://ewds.strath.ac.uk/Portals/8/typology.doc (accessed 12.05.2022). (In Eng.).Abankina I., Aleskerov F., Belousova V., Gokhberg L., Zinkovsky K., Kiselgof S., Petrushchenko V., Shvydun S. Performance-based typology of universities: Evidence from Russia. Moscow : HSE Series, 2015. 40 p.Abankina I., Aleskerov F., Belousova V., Gokhberg L., Zinkovsky K., Kiselgof S., Petrushchenko V., Shvydun S. Performance-Based Typology of Universities: Evidence from Russia, Moscow, HSE Series, 2015, 40 p. (In Eng.).Типология университетов, модели и инструменты организационного развития / под ред. В. С. Ефимова. Красноярск : Сибирский федеральный университет, 2018. 61 с.Efimov V. S. (ed.) Tipologiya universitetov, modeli i instrumenty organizatsionnogo razvitiya [Typology of Universities, Models and Tools Instruments of Organizational Development], Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University, 2018, 61 p. (In Russ.).McCarthy I. P., Bruno S. Silvestre B. S., Nordenflycht A. von, Breznitz Sh. M. A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2018. № 47. P. 110–122.McCarthy I. P., Bruno S. Silvestre B. S., Nordenflycht A. von, Breznitz Sh. M. A Typology of University Research Park Strategies: What Parks Do and Why it Matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2018, nr 47, pp. 110–122. (In Eng.).Torre E. M. de la, Casani F., Sagarra M. Defining typologies of universities through a DEA-MDS analysis: An institutional characterization for formative evaluation purposes // Research Evaluation. 2018. Vol. 27. № 4. P. 388– 403. DOI 10.1093/reseval/rvy024.Torre E. M. de la, Casani F., Sagarra M. Defining Typologies of Universities through a DEA-MDS Analysis: An Institutional Characterization for Formative Evaluation Purposes. Research Evaluation, 2018, vol. 27, nr 4, pp. 388– 403. doi 10.1093/reseval/rvy024. (In Eng.).Воейкова О. Б. Концептуальное видение нового университета в работах современных ученых: типология концепций инноватизации высшей школы // Экономика науки. 2020. № 6 (3). С. 186–198. DOI 10.22394/2410–132X-202эж-6-3-186-198.Voeykova O. B. Kontseptual’noe videnie novogo universiteta v rabotakh sovremennykh uchenykh: tipologiya kontseptsii innovatizatsii vysshei shkoly [Conceptual Vision of a the New University in the Works of Modern Scientists: Typology of the Concepts of Innovatisation of the Higher School]. Ekonomika nauki, 2020, vol. 6, nr 3, pp. 186–198. doi 10.22394/2410–132X-2020-6-3-186-198. (In Russ.).Tang H. H., Chau C. W. Knowledge exchange in a global city: a typology of universities and institutional analysis, European Journal of Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 93–112. DOI 10.1080/21568235.2019.1694424.Tang H. H., Chau C. W. Knowledge Exchange in a Global City: A Typology of Universities and Institutional Analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 2020, vol. 10, nr 1, pp. 93–112. doi 10.1080/21568235.2019.1694424. (In Eng.).Stam E., Spigel B. Entrepreneurial ecosystems // Utrecht School of Economics. Discussion Paper Series 16–13. 15 p.Stam E., Spigel B. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, available at: https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/rebo_use_dp_2016_1613.pdf (accessed 12.05.2022). (In Eng.).Moore J. Predators and Prey: а New Ecology of Competition // Harvard Business Review. 1993. Vol. 71. № 3. P. 75–86.Moore J. Predators and Prey: А New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 1993, vol. 71, nr 3, pp. 75–86. (In Eng.).Li Y. R. The Technological Roadmap of Cisco’s Business Ecosystem // Technovation. 2009. Vol. 29. № 5. P. 379–386.Li Y. R. The Technological Roadmap of Cisco’s Business Ecosystem. Technovation, 2009, vol. 29, nr 5, pp. 379–386. (In Eng.).Walrave В., Talmar M., Podoynitsyna K. S., Romme A. G. L., Verbong G. P. J. A Multi-level Perspective on Innovation Ecosystems for Path-breaking Innovation //Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2018. Vol. 136. P. 103–113.Walrave В., Talmar M., Podoynitsyna K. S., Romme A. G. L., Verbong G. P. J. A Multi-Level Perspective on Innovation Ecosystems for Path-Breaking Innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2018, vol. 136, pp. 103–113. (In Eng.).Radziwon A., Bogers M. Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an Ecosystem // Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2019. Vol. 146. P. 573–587.Radziwon A., Bogers M. Open Innovation in SMEs: Exploring Inter-Organizational Relationships in an Ecosystem. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2019, vol. 146, pp. 573–587. (In Eng.).Konietzko J., Bocken N., Hultink E. J. Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652619348127 (дата обращения: 12.03.2022).Konietzko J., Bocken N., Hultink E. J. Circular Ecosystem Innovation: An Initial Set of Principles, available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652619348127 (accessed 12.03.2022). (In Eng.).Thomas L. D. W., Sharapov D., Autio E. Linking Entrepreneurial and Innovation Ecosystems: the Case of AppCampus // Entrepreneural Ecosystems and the Diffusion of Startups. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing LTD, 2016. P. 35–64.Thomas L. D. W., Sharapov D., Autio E. Linking Entrepreneurial and Innovation Ecosystems: The Case of AppCampus. Entrepreneural Ecosystems and the Diffusion of Startups, Glos, 2016, pp. 35–64. (In Eng.).Ritala P., Almpanopoulou A. In Defense of ‘eco’ in Innovation Ecosystem // Technovation. 2017. Vol. 60–61. P. 39–42.Ritala P., Almpanopoulou A. In Defense of ‘Eco’ in Innovation Ecosystem. Technovation, 2017, vol. 60–61, pp. 39–42. (In Eng.).Battistella C., Colucci K., De Toni A. F., Nonino F. Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: A case study in Telecom Italia Future Centre // Technological Forecasting & Social Change Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2013. Vol. 80. P. 1194–1210.Battistella C., Colucci K., De Toni A. F., Nonino F. Methodology of Business Ecosystems Network Analysis: A Case Study in Telecom Italia Future Centre. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2013, vol. 80, pp. 1194–1210. (In Eng.).Guerrero M., Martínez-Chávez M. Aligning regional and business strategies: Looking inside the Basque Country entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem // Thunderbird International Business Review. 2020. Vol. 62. № 1. DOI 10.1002/tie.22162.Guerrero M., Martínez-Chávez M. Aligning Regional and Business Strategies: Looking inside the Basque Country Entrepreneurial Innovation Ecosystem. Thunderbird International Business Review, 2020, vol. 62, iss. 5, pp. 607– 621. doi 10.1002/tie.22162. (In Eng.).Adner R. Match your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem // Harvard Business Review. 2006. Vol. 84. № 4. P. 98–107.Adner R. Match your Innovation Strategy to your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 2006, vol. 84, nr 4, pp. 98–107. (In Eng.).Iansiti M., Levien R. Strategy as Ecology // Harvard Business Review. 2004. Vol. 82. № 3. P. 68–78.Iansiti M., Levien R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 2004, vol. 82, nr 3, pp. 68–78. (In Eng.).Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology // European Journal of Innovation Management. 2003. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 325– 326. DOI 10.1108/14601060410565074.Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2003, vol. 7, nr 4, pp. 325–326. doi 10.1108/14601060410565074. (In Eng.).Robaczewska J., Vanhaverbeke W., Lorenz A. Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals // Global Transitions. 2019. № 1. P. 120–131.Robaczewska J., Vanhaverbeke W., Lorenz A. Applying Open Innovation Strategies in the Context of a Regional Innovation Ecosystem: The Case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 2019, nr 1, pp. 120–131. (In Eng.).Durst S., Poutanen P. Success factors of innovation ecosystems-Initial insights from a literature review. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321278484_Success_factors_of_innovation_ecosystems-Initial_insights_from_a_literature_review (дата обращения: 12.03.2022).Durst S., Poutanen P. Success Factors of Innovation Ecosystems – Initial Insights from a Literature Review, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321278484_Success_factors_of_innovation_ecosystems-Initial_insights_from_a_literature_review (accessed 12.03.2022). (In Eng.).Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure // Journal of Financial Economics. 1976. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 305–360.Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, vol. 3, nr 4, pp. 305–360. (In Eng.).Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. Москва: Фонд экономической книги «НАЧАЛА», 1997. 180 с.North D. C. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and the Functioning of the Economy], Moscow, Nachala, 1997, 180 p. (In Russ.).Каро-Гонсалес А., Анабо А. Ф. За пределами преподавания и исследований: взгляд на меняющиеся роли высшего образования изнутри // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Т. 13. № 6. С. 252–266. DOI 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.15.Caro-González A., Anabo I. F. Za predelami prepodavaniya i issledovanii: vzglyad na menyayushchiesya roli vysshego obrazovaniya iznutri [Beyond Teaching and Research: Stakeholder Perspectives on the Evolving Roles of Higher Education]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 2020, vol. 13, nr 6, pp. 252–266. doi 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.15. (In Russ.).Consolmagno Pelegrini G., Salati Marcondes de Moraes G. H. Does gender matter? A university ecosystem, self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention analysis in Brazilian universities // Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2021. DOI 10.1108/GM-01-2021-0007.Consolmagno Pelegrini G., Salati Marcondes de Moraes G. H. Does Gender Matter? A University Ecosystem, Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention Analysis in Brazilian Universities. Gender in Management, 2021, vol. 37, nr 2, pp. 271–286. doi 10.1108/GM-01-2021-0007. (In Eng.).Tolstykh T., Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N. Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective // Sage Open. 2021. P. 1–16. DOI 10.1177/2158244020988704.Tolstykh T., Gamidullaeva L., Shmeleva N. Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244020988704 (accessed 12.03.2022). (In Eng.).Markkula M., Kune H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems // Technology Innovation Management Review. 2015. Vol. 5. № 10. P. 7–15.Markkula M., Kune H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2015, vol. 5, nr 10, pp. 7–15. (In Eng.).Thomas E., Faccin K., Terje Asheim B. Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies // Growth and Change. 2020. P. 1–20. DOI 10.1111/grow.12442.Thomas E., Faccin K., Terje Asheim B. Universities as Orchestrators of the Development of Regional Innovation Ecosystems in Emerging Economies. Growth and Change, 2021, vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 770–789. doi 10.1111/grow.12442. (In Eng.).Pellikka J., Ali-Vehmas T. Managing Innovation Ecosystems to Create and Capture Value in ICT Industries // Technology Innovation Management Review. 2016. Vol. 6. № 10. P. 17–24.Pellikka J., Ali-Vehmas T. Managing Innovation Ecosystems to Create and Capture Value in ICT Industries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2016, vol. 6, nr 10, pp. 17–24. (In Eng.).Ranga M., Mroczkowski T., Araiso T. University–industry cooperation and the transition to innovation ecosystems in Japan // Industry and Higher Education. 2017. Vol. 31. № 6. P. 373–387.Ranga M., Mroczkowski T., Araiso T. University– Industry Cooperation and the Transition to Innovation Ecosystems in Japan. Industry and Higher Education, 2017, vol. 31, nr 6, pp. 373–387. (In Eng.).Knottnerus A. No University without Diversity. The Dynamic Ecosystem of Scientific and Social Innovation // The Dutch National Research Agenda in Perspective. A Reflection on Research and Science Policy in Practice. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. P. 209–219.Knottnerus A. No University without Diversity. The Dynamic Ecosystem of Scientific and Social Innovation. The Dutch National Research Agenda in Perspective. A Reflection on Research and Science Policy in Practice, Amsterdam, 2021, pp. 209–219. (In Eng.).Pachciarek H., Szarek M., Wiaterek D. Models of In novation instit utions management in the university ecosystem // Scientific papers of Silesian university of Technology. 2020. № 145. P. 359–372. DOI 10.29119/1641–3466.2020.145.27.Pachciarek H., Szarek M., Wiaterek D. Models of Innovation Instit utions Management in the University Ecosystem. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 2020, nr 145, pp. 359–372. doi 10.29119/1641–3466.2020.145.27. (In Eng.).Li Sun S., Zhang Y., Cao Y., Dong J., Cantwell J. Enriching innovation ecosystems: The role of government in a university science park // Global Transitions. 2019. № 1. P. 104–119.Li Sun S., Zhang Y., Cao Y., Dong J., Cantwell J. Enriching Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Government in a University Science Park. Global Transitions, 2019, nr 1, pp. 104–119. (In Eng.).Villani E., Lechner Ch. How to acquire legitimacy and become a player in a regional innovation ecosystem? The case of a young university // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2021. Vol. 46. № 1. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09803-8.Villani E., Lechner Ch. How to Acquire Legitimacy and Become a Player in a Regional Innovation Ecosystem? The Case of a Young University. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2021, vol. 46, nr 4, pp. 1017–1045. doi 10.1007/s10961-020-09803-8. (In Eng.).Pique J. M., Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent J., Etzkowitz H. The Role of Universities in Shaping the Evolution of Silicon Valley’s Ecosystem of Innovation // Triple Helix. 2020. № 7. P. 277–321. DOI 10.1163/21971927-bja10009.Piqué J. M., Berbegal-Mirabent J., Etzkowitz H. The Role of Universities in Shaping the Evolution of Silicon Valley’s Ecosystem of Innovation. Triple Helix, 2020, nr 7, pp. 277–321. doi10.1163/21971927-bja10009. (In Eng.).Bacon E. C., Williams M. D. Deconstructing the ivory tower: identifying challenges of university-industry ecosystem partnerships // Review of Managerial Science. 2022. Vol. 16. № 1. DOI 10.1007/s11846-020-00436-7.Bacon E. C., Williams M. D. Deconstructing the Ivory Tower: Identifying Challenges of UniversityIndustry Ecosystem Partnerships. Review of Managerial Science, 2022, vol. 16, pp. 113–134. doi 10.1007/s11846-020-00436-7. (In Eng.).Tejero A., Pau I., León G. Analysis of the Dynamism in University-Driven Innovation Ecosystems Through the Assessment of Entrepreneurship Role // IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 89869–89885. DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926988.Tejero A., Pau I., León G. Analysis of the Dynamism in University-Driven Innovation Ecosystems Through the Assessment of Entrepreneurship Role. IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 89869–89885. doi 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926988. (In Eng.).Attour A., Lazaric N. From knowledge to business ecosystems: emergence of an entrepreneurial activity during knowledge replication // Small Bus Econ. 2020. № 54. P. 575–587.Attour A., Lazaric N. From Knowledge to Business Ecosystems: Emergence of an Entrepreneurial Activity during Knowledge Replication. Small Business Economics, 2020, nr 54, pp. 575–587. (In Eng.).Prokop D. University entrepreneurial ecosystems and spinoff companies: Configurations, developments and outcomes // Technovation. 2021. Vol. 7. DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102286.Prokop D. University Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Spinoff Companies: Configurations, Developments and Outcomes. Technovation, 2021, vol. 107, article 102286. doi 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102286. (In Eng.).Grobbelaar S. S. Developing a local innovation ecosystem through a university coordinated innovation platform: The University of Fort Hare // Development Southern Africa. 2018. Vol. 35. № 5. P. 657–672. DOI 10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902.Grobbelaar S. S. Developing a Local Innovation Ecosystem through a University Coordinated Innovation Platform: The University of Fort Hare. Development Southern Africa, 2018, vol. 35, nr 5, pp. 657–672. doi 10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902. (In Eng.).Bock C., Dilmetz D., Selznick B. S., Zhang L., Mayhew M. J. How the university ecosystem shapes the innovation capacities of undergraduate students – evidence from Germany // Industry and Innovation. 2021. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 307–342. DOI 10.1080/13662716.2020.1784710.Bock C., Dilmetz D., Selznick B. S., Zhang L., Mayhew M. J. How the University Ecosystem Shapes the Innovation Capacities of Undergraduate Students – Evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 2021, vol. 28, nr 3, pp. 307–342. doi 10.1080/13662716.2020.1784710. (In Eng.).Cross S. Applying a Research University’s Leadership Model in a Regional Innovation Ecosystem. URL: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1967750007 (дата обращения: 12.03.2022).Cross S. Applying a Research University’s Leadership Model in a Regional Innovation Ecosystem, available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1967750007 (accessed 12.03.2022). (In Eng.).Boruck Klein S., Vasconcelos M. C. L. R. de, Jesus Carvalho Lima R. de, Dufloth S. C. Contributions from entrepreneurial universities to the regional innovation ecosystem of Boston // Revista Gestão & Tecnologia. 2021. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 245–268.Boruck Klein S., Vasconcelos M. C. L. R. de, Jesus Carvalho Lima R. de, Dufloth S. C. Contributions from Entrepreneurial Universities to the Regional Innovation Ecosystem of Boston. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 2021, vol. 21, nr 1, pp. 245–268. (In Eng.).Salati Marcondes de Moraes G. H., Brandão Fischer B., Guerrero M., Lopes da Rocha A. K., Rücker Schaeffer P. An inquiry into the linkages between university ecosystem and students’ entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy // Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2021. DOI 10.1080/14703297.2021.1969262.Salati Marcondes de Moraes G. H., Brandão Fischer B., Guerrero M., Lopes da Rocha A. K., Rücker Schaeffer P. An Inquiry into the Linkages between University Ecosystem and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention and Self-Efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2021, pp. 1–12. doi 10.1080/14703297.2021.1969262. (In Eng.).Wang X., Sun X., Liu S., Mu C. A Preliminary Exploration of Factors Affecting a University Entrepreneurship Ecosystem // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732388.Wang X., Sun X., Liu S., Mu C. A Preliminary Exploration of Factors Affecting a University Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, vol. 12, article 732388. doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732388. (In Eng.).De Jager H. J., Mthembu T. Z., Ngowi A. B., Chipunza C. Towards an Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Central University of Technology, Free State // Science, Technology & Society. 2017. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 310–331.De Jager H. J., Mthembu T. Z., Ngowi A. B., Chipunza C. Towards an Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Central University of Technology, Free State. Science, Technology & Society, 2017, vol. 22, nr 2, pp. 310–331. (In Eng.).Rücker Schaeffer P., Fischer B., Queiroz S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems // Foresight and STI Governance. 2018. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 50–61. DOI 10.17323/2500–2597.2018.2.50.61.Rücker Schaeffer P., Fischer B., Queiroz S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018, vol. 12, nr 2, pp. 50–61. doi 10.17323/2500–2597.2018.2.50.61. (In Eng.).Heaton S., Siegel D. S., Teece D. J. Universities and innovation ecosystems: a dynamic capabilities perspective // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2019. Vol. 28. № 4. P. 921– 939. DOI 10.1093/icc/dtz038.Heaton S., Siegel D. S., Teece D. J. Universities and Innovation Ecosystems: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2019, vol. 28, nr 4, pp. 921– 939. doi 10.1093/icc/dtz038. (In Eng.).Birkner Z., Máhr T., Rodek Berkes N. Changes in Responsibilities and Tasks of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems // Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy. 2017. Vol. 63. № 2. P. 15–21. DOI 10.1515/ngoe-2017–0008.Birkner Z., Máhr T., Rodek Berkes N. Changes in Responsibilities and Tasks of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Naše gospodarst vo/Our Economy, 2017, vol. 63, nr 2, pp. 15–21. doi 10.1515/ngoe-2017–0008. (In Eng.).Bacon E., Williams M. D., Davies G. H. Recipes for success: Conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystems // International Journal of Information Management. 2019. № 49. P. 377–387.Bacon E., Williams M. D., Davies G. H. Recipes for Success: Conditions for Knowledge Transfer across Open Innovation Ecosystems. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, nr 49, pp. 377–387. (In Eng.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.