umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2021.02.016umj-1369Research ArticleЦИФРОВАЯ СРЕДА ВУЗАUNIVERSITY DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTГотовность российских студентов к дистанционным форматам обучения: существующее положение и перспективные задачиRussian Students’ Readiness for Distance Learning: Current Situation and Future ChallengesКиройВ. Н.KiroyV. N.

Кирой Валерий Николаевич – профессор, доктор биологических наук, главный научный сотрудник, НИТЦ нейротехнологий

344090, Ростов-на-Дону, пр. Стачки, 194

Valeriy N. Kiroy – Dr. hab. (Biology), Professor, Principal Researcher, Scientific and Research Technological Center of Neurotechnology

105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006

kiroy@sfedu.ruЩербинаД. Н.SherbinaD. N.

Щербина Дмитрий Николаевич – кандидат биологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, НИТЦ нейротехнологий, Южный федеральный университет

344090, Ростов-на-Дону, пр. Стачки, 194

344000, Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1

Dmitry N. Sherbina – PhD (Biology), Leading Researcher, Scientific and Research Technological Center of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University

105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006

1 Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000

dnsherbina@sfedu.ruЧерноваА. А.ChernovaA. A.

Чернова Анастасия Александровна – кандидат психологических наук, доцент, Академия психологии и педагогики

344090, Ростов-на-Дону, пр. Стачки, 194

Anastasiya A. Chernova – PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy

105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006

achernova@sfedu.ruДенисоваЕ. Г.DenisovaE. G.

Денисова Екатерина Геннадьевна – кандидат психологических наук, старший преподаватель, факультет «Психология, педагогика и дефектология»

344000, Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1

Ekaterina G. Denisova – PhD (Psychology), Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychology, Pedagogy and Defectology

1 Gagarin sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344000

denisovakeith@gmail.comЛазуренкоД. М.LazurenkoD. M.

Лазуренко Дмитрий Михайлович – ведущий научный сотрудник, НИТЦ нейротехнологий

344090, Ростов-на-Дону, пр. Стачки, 194

Dmitry M. Lazurenko – Leading Researcher, Scientific and Research Technological Center of Neurotechnology

105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006

dmlazurenko@sfedu.ruЮжный федеральный университетРоссияSouthern Federal UniversityRussian FederationЮжный федеральный университет; Донской государственный технический университетРоссияSouthern Federal University; Don State Technical UniversityRussian FederationДонской государственный технический университетРоссияDon State Technical UniversityRussian Federation2021120820212528097Copyright © Кирой В.Н., Щербина Д.Н., Чернова А.А., Денисова Е.Г., Лазуренко Д.М., 20212021Кирой В.Н., Щербина Д.Н., Чернова А.А., Денисова Е.Г., Лазуренко Д.М.Kiroy V.N., Sherbina D.N., Chernova A.A., Denisova E.G., Lazurenko D.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1369

Данная исследовательская статья посвящена вопросу владения студентами технологиями дистанционного обучения, актуальность которого резко возросла в условиях коронавирусной пандемии. Есть основания полагать, что и после ее преодоления высшая школа будет все более активно использовать эти технологии. Целью проведенного авторами исследования являлась оценка готовности студентов российских вузов к использованию технологий дистанционного обучения. В ходе анкетирования 428 студентов, обучающихся в вузах г. Ростова-на-Дону, были собраны сведения о развитии у опрошенных навыков использования интернет-технологий в сфере образования. Результаты исследования показали, что в предпандемический период необходимыми навыками для участия в видеоконференциях владели не более четверти студентов, навыками для самостоятельного освоения онлайн-курсов – около 16 %. Владение обеими технологиями, обеспечивающее эффективное дистанционное обучение, имело место лишь у 6,5 % респондентов. Полученные сведения о связи успеваемости с самостоятельным участием в онлайн-курсах, а также о соотношении этих показателей с общей цифровой грамотностью и погруженностью в социальные сети следует учитывать при широкой цифровой трансформации образования в условиях пандемии.

In the context of the COVID pandemic, there has dramatically increased the significance of distance learning technologies. Higher education will most probably increase their usage even after overcoming the coronavirus. This paper aims at assessing Russian university students’ readiness to exercise distance learning technologies. The survey within Rostov-on-Don universities provided data on 428 students’ skills in using Internet technologies when studying. It is shown that in the pre-pandemic period, no more than a quarter of students had the necessary skills to participate in video conferences, and about 16 % of students took online courses autonomously. Only 6,5 % of the respondents could manage both technologies that comprise distance learning. The results obtained on the relationship between academic performance and self-participation in online courses, as well as on the relationship of these indicators with general digital literacy and immersion in social networks, should be taken into account within wide computerization of education during the pandemic.

дистанционное обучениевидеоконференцсвязьмассовые онлайн-курсыанкетированиесоциальные сетиуспеваемостьпандемияdistance learningvideo conferencingmass online coursespollingsocial networksacademic performancepandemicРабота выполнена при финансовой поддержке Министерства науки и высшего образования РФ в рамках Постановления № 218 «Создание высокотехнологичного производства программного комплекса для управления человеческим капиталом на основе нейротехнологий для предприятий высокотехнологичного сектора Российской Федерации» (шифр 2019-218-11-8185). Также авторы статьи выражают признательность Южному федеральному университету, предоставившему площадку для организации онлайн-анкетирования.The survey was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Decree No. 218 «Creation of a High-Tech Production of a Software Package for Human Capital Management Based on Neurotechnologies for Enterprises of the High-Tech Sector of the Russian Federation», 2019-218-11-8185). The authors are also grateful to Southern Federal University for having provided facilities to organize an online survey.ReferencesBates A. W., Bates T. Technology, e-learning and distance education. 2nd ed. London : Psychology Press, 2005. 256 p. DOI 10.4324/9780203463772.Bates A. W., Bates T. Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education, 2nd ed., London, Psychology Press, 2005, 256 p. doi 10.4324/9780203463772. (In Eng.).Simonson M., Zvacek S. M., Smaldino S. Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. 7th ed. Charlotte : IAP, 2019. 361 p.Simonson M., Zvacek S. M., Smaldino S. Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education, 7th ed., Charlotte, IAP, 2019, 361 p. (In Eng.).A n I nt roduct ion to Dist a nce Educat ion: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era / M. F. Cleveland-Innes, D. R. Garrison (eds.). New York : Routledge, 2020. Iss. 2. 228 p. DOI 10.4324/9781315166896.Cleveland-Innes M. F., Garrison D. R. (eds.) An Introduction to Distance Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era, iss. 2, New York, Routledge, 2020, 228 p. doi 10.4324/9781315166896. (In Eng.).Correia A.-P., Liu C., Xu F. Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience // Distance Education. 2020. Vol. 41, nr 4. P. 429–452. DOI 10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607.Correia A.-P., Liu C., Xu F. Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Education, 2020, vol. 41, nr 4, pp. 429–452. doi 10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607. (In Eng.).Баскаков Ю. А., Соболева О. М. Использование видеоконференцсвязи в учебном процессе // Казанский педагогический журнал. 2010. № 1. С. 128–134.Baskakov Yu. A., Soboleva O. M. Ispol’zovanie videokonferentssvyazi v uchebnom protsesse [Use of Videoconferencing in the Educational Process]. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 2010, nr 1, pp. 128–134. (In Russ.).Бугайчук К. Л. Массовые открытые дистанционные курсы: история, типология, перспективы // Высшее образование в России. 2013. № 3. С. 148–155.Bugaychuk K. L. Massovye otkrytye distantsionnye kursy: istoriya, tipologiya, perspektivy [Massive Open Online Courses: History, Typology, Perspectives]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2013, nr 3, pp. 148–155. (In Russ.).Андреев А. А. Российские открытые образовательные ресурсы и массовые открытые дистанционные курсы // Высшее образование в России. 2014. № 6. С. 150–155.Andreev A. A. Rossiiskie otkrytye obrazovatel’nye resursy i massovye otkrytye distantsionnye kursy [Russian Open Educational Resources and Massive Online Courses]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2014, nr 6, pp. 150–155. (In Russ.).Титова С. В. МООК в российском образовании // Высшее образование в России. 2015. № 12. С. 145–151.Titova S. V. MOOK v rossiiskom obrazovanii [MOOCs in Russian Universities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2015, nr 12, pp. 145–151. (In Russ.).Опрос: более 85 % студентов РАНХиГС сообщили о проведенных по расписанию занятиях в дистанте // Казанский филиал РАНХиГС : официальный сайт. URL: https://kaz.ranepa.ru/news/?element_id=332818 (дата обращения: 23.01.2021).Opros: bolee 85 % studentov RANKhiGS soobshchili o provedennykh po raspisaniyu zanyatiyakh v distante [More than 85 % of RANEPA Students Reported on Scheduled Online Lessons Having Been Run], available at: URL: https://kaz.ranepa.ru/news/?element_id=332818 (accessed 23.01.2021). (In Russ.).Оценка электронного обучения и дистанционных образовательных технологий (вторая волна) // Новости КубГТУ. URL: https://kubstu.ru/r-9040 (дата обращения: 23.01.2021).Otsenka elektronnogo obucheniya i distantsionnykh obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologii (vtoraya volna) [Evaluation of E-Learning and Distance Education Technologies (Second Wave)], available at: https://kubstu.ru/r-9040 (accessed 23.01.2021). (In Russ.).Игнатьев В. П., Архангельская Е. А. Дистанционное образование глазами студентов (анализ результатов опроса студентов федерального университета) // Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2020. № 6-1. С. 138–142. DOI 10.17513/snt.38083.Ignatiev V. P., Archangelskaya E. A. Distantsionnoe obrazovanie glazami studentov (analiz rezul’tatov oprosa studentov federal’nogo universiteta) [Distance Education through the Eyes of Students (Analysis of the Results of a Survey of Federal University Students)]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2020, nr 6-1, pp. 138–142. doi 10.17513/snt.38083. (In Russ.).OECD Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. Paris : OECD, 2015. 204 p. DOI 10.1787/9789264239555-en.OECD Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, OECD, Paris: 2015, 204 p. doi 10.1787/9789264239555-en. (In Eng.).ICT and Digital Divides / R. J. Krumsvik, F. M. Røkenes, L. Ø. Jones [et al.] // ICICTE Proceedings. Greece : Rhodes Island, 2018. P. 98–115.Krumsvik R. J., Røkenes F. M., Jones L. Ø., Eikeland O.-J., Høydal K. L. ICT and Digital Divides. ICICTE Proceedings, Rhodes Island, Greece, 2018, pp. 98–115. (In Eng.).Relationship between Digital Development and Subjective Well-Being in Chilean School Children / G. Donoso, F. Casas, J. C. Oyanedel, M. López // Computers & Education. 2021. Vol. 160. Article 104027. DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104027.Donoso G., Casas F., Oyanedel J. C., López M. Relationship between Digital Development and Subjective Well-Being in Chilean School Children. Computers & Education, 2021, vol. 160, article 104027. doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104027. (In Eng.).Gui M., Büchi M. From Use to Overuse: Digital Inequality in the Age of Communication Abundance // Social Science Computer Review. 2021. Vol. 39, nr 1. P. 3–19. DOI 10.1177/0894439319851163.Gui M., Büchi M. From Use to Overuse: Digital Inequality in the Age of Communication Abundance. Social Science Computer Review, 2021, vol. 39, nr 1, pp. 3–19. doi 10.1177/0894439319851163. (In Eng.).Hargittai E., Micheli M. Internet Skills and Why They Matter // Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 109–124.Hargittai E., Micheli M. Internet Skills and Why They Matter. In: Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 109–124. (In Eng.).Deursen A. J. van, Helsper E. J. Collateral Benefits of Internet Use: Explaining the Diverse Outcomes of Engaging with the Internet // New Media & Society. 2018. Vol. 20, nr 7. P. 2333–2351. DOI 10.1177/1461444817715282.Deursen A. J. van, Helsper E. J. Collateral Benefits of Internet Use: Explaining the Diverse Outcomes of Engaging with the Internet. New Media & Society, 2018, vol. 20, nr 7, pp. 2333–2351. doi 10.1177/1461444817715282. (In Eng.).Deursen A. J. van, Dijk J. A. van. The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage // New Media & Society. 2014. Vol. 16, nr 3. P. 507–526.Deursen A. J. van, Dijk J. A. van. The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage. New Media & Society, 2014, vol. 16, nr 3, pp. 507–526. (In Eng.).Büchi M., Festic N., Latzer M. How Social Well-Being is Affected by Digital Inequalities // International Journal of Communication. 2018. Vol. 12. P. 3686–3706.Büchi M., Festic N., Latzer M. How Social Well-Being is Affected by Digital Inequalities. International Journal of Communication, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 3686–3706. (In Eng.).Büchi M., Festic N., Latzer M. Digital Overuse and Subjective Well-Being in a Digitized Society // Social Media + Society. 2019. Vol. 5, nr 4. P. 1–12. DOI 10.1177/2056305119886031.Büchi M., Festic N., Latzer M. Digital Overuse and Subjective Well-Being in a Digitized Society. Social Media + Society, 2019, vol. 5, nr 4, pp. 1–12. doi 10.1177/2056305119886031. (In Eng.).Hillmer U. Existing Theories Considering Technology Adoption // Technology Acceptance in Mechatronics: The Influence of Identity on Technology Acceptance / ed. U. Hillmer. Wiesbaden : Gabler, 2009. P. 9–28. DOI 10.1007/978-3-8349-8375-6_3.Hillmer U. Existing Theories Considering Technology Adoption. In: U. Hillmer (ed.), Technology Acceptance in Mechatronics: The Influence of Identity on Technology Acceptance, Wiesbaden, 2009, pp. 9–28. doi 10.1007/978-3-8 349-8375-6_3. (In Eng.).Straub E. T. Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning // Review of Educational Research. 2009. Vol. 79, nr 2. P. 625–649. DOI 10.3102/0034654308325896.Straub E. T. Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 2009, vol. 79, nr 2, pp. 625–649. doi 10.3102/0034654308325896. (In Eng.).Scherer R., Siddiq F., Tondeur J. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explaining Teachers’ Adoption of Digital Technology in Education // Computers & Education. 2019. Vol. 128. P. 13–35. DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.Scherer R., Siddiq F., Tondeur J. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Explaining Teachers’ Adoption of Digital Technology in Education. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 128, pp. 13–35. doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009. (In Eng.).Lamprou S. P., Lvovskaya Y. Individual Adoption to Innovation: A Study of MOOCs in Swedish Universities. Uppsala University, 2015. 51 p.Lamprou S. P., Lvovskaya Y. Individual Adoption to Innovation: A Study of MOOCs in Swedish Universities, Uppsala University, 2015, 51 p. (In Eng.).User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View / V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, F. D. Davis // MIS Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 27, nr 3. P. 425–478.Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 2003, vol. 27, nr. 3, pp. 425–478. (In Eng.).Wu B., Chen X. Research on MOOCs Continuance // 3rd International Conference on Material, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering (IC3ME2015). Guangzhou, China : Atlantis Press, 2015. P. 1143–1146.Wu B., Chen X. Research on MOOCs Continuance. In: 3rd International Conference on Material, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering (IC3ME2015), Guangzhou, 2015, pp. 1143–1146. (In Eng.).Song Z. X., Cheung M. F., Prud’Homme S. Theoretical Frameworks and Research Methods in the Study of MOOC/ E-Learning Behaviors: A Theoretical and Empirical Review // New Ecology for Education – Communication X Learning / W. W. K. Ma, C.-K. Chan, K. Tong [et al.] (eds.). Singapore : Springer, 2017. P. 47–65. DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_5.Song Z. X., Cheung M. F., Prud’Homme S. Theoretical Frameworks and Research Methods in the Study of MOOC/ELearning Behaviors: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. In: W. W. K. Ma, C.-K. Chan, K. Tong [et al.] (eds.), New Ecology for Education – Communication X Learning, Springer, 2017, pp. 47–65. doi 10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_5. (In Eng.).An Investigation of Mobile Learning Readiness in Higher Education Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior / J. Cheon, S. Lee, S. M. Crooks, J. Song // Computers & Education. 2012. Vol. 59, nr 3. P. 1054–1064. DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015.Cheon J., Lee S., Crooks S. M., Song J. An Investigation of Mobile Learning Readiness in Higher Education Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Computers & Education, 2012, vol. 59, nr 3, pp. 1054–1064. doi 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015. (In Eng.).Stowell J. R., Oldham T., Bennett D. Using Student Response Systems («Clickers») to Combat Conformity and Shyness // Teaching of Psychology. 2010. Vol. 37, nr 2. P. 135–140. DOI 10.1080/00986281003626631.Stowell J. R., Oldham T., Bennett D. Using Student Response Systems («Clickers») to Combat Conformity and Shyness. Teaching of Psychology, 2010, vol. 37, nr 2, pp. 135–140. doi 10.1080/00986281003626631. (In Eng.).Conformity of Responses among Graduate Students in an Online Environment / T. Beran, M. Drefs, A. Kaba [et al.] // The Internet and Higher Education. 2015. Vol. 25. P. 63–69. DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.01.001.Beran T., Drefs M., Kaba A., Al Baz N., Al Harbi N. Conformity of Responses among Graduate Students in an Online Environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 2015, vol. 25, pp. 63–69. doi 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.01.001. (In Eng.).Goodfellow R., Lea M. Literacy and the Digital University // The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research. London : SAGE Publcations, 2016. P. 423–442.Goodfellow R., Lea M. Literacy and the Digital University. In: The SAGE Handbook of E-Learning Research, London, 2016, pp. 423–442. (In Eng.).Precise Effectiveness Strategy for Analyzing the Effectiveness of Students with Educational Resources and Activities in MOOCs / P. J. Muñoz-Merino, J. A. RuipérezValiente, C. Alario-Hoyos [et al.] // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. Vol. 47. P. 108–118. DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.003.Muñoz-Merino P. J., Ruipérez-Valiente J. A., AlarioHoyos C., Pérez-Sanagustín M., Delgado Kloos C. Precise Effectiveness Strategy for Analyzing the Effectiveness of Students with Educational Resources and Activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, vol. 47, pp. 108–118. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.003. (In Eng.).Hmedna B., El Mezouary A., Baz O. A Predictive Model for the Identification of Learning Styles in MOOC Environments // Cluster Computing. 2019. Nr 23. P. 1303–1328. DOI 10.1007/s10586-019-02992-4.Hmedna B., El Mezouary A., Baz O. A Predictive Model for the Identification of Learning Styles in MOOC Environments. Cluster Computing, 2019, nr 23, pp. 1303–1328. doi 10.1007/s10586-019-02992-4. (In Eng.).Bradshaw K., Parchoma G., Lock J. Conceptualizing Formal and Informal Learning in MOOCs as Activity Systems // Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 33–92.Bradshaw K., Parchoma G., Lock J. Conceptualizing Formal and Informal Learning in MOOCs as Activity Systems. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2017, vol. 18, pp. 33–92. (In Eng.).Antonaci A., Klemke R., Specht M. The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review // Informatics. 2019. Vol. 6, nr 3. P. 32.Antonaci A., Klemke R., Specht M. The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review. Informatics, 2019, vol. 6, nr 3, p. 32. (In Eng.).Romero-Rodriguez L. M., Ramirez-Montoya M. S., Gonzalez J. R. V. Gamification in MOOCs: Engagement Application Test in Energy Sustainability Courses // IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 32093–32101. DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903230.Romero-Rodriguez L. M., Ramirez-Montoya M. S., Gonzalez J. R. V. Gamification in MOOCs: Engagement Application Test in Energy Sustainability Courses. IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 32093–32101. doi 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903230. (In Eng.).Hill A. J. Social Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: An Analysis of Pedagogical Implications and Students’ Learning Experiences. PhD Thesis. The University of California, Los Angeles, 2015. 156 p.Hill A. J. Social Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: An Analysis of Pedagogical Implications and Students’ Learning Experiences, PhD Thesis, The University of California, Los Angeles, 2015, 156 p. (In Eng.).Mantziou O., Papachristos N. M., Mikropoulos T. A. Learning Activities as Enactments of Learning Affordances in MUVEs: A Review-Based Classification // Education and Information Technologies. 2018. Vol. 23, nr 4. P. 1737–1765. DOI 10.1007/s10639-018-9690-x.Mantziou O., Papachristos N. M., Mikropoulos T. A. Learning Activities as Enactments of Learning Affordances in MUVEs: A Review-Based Classification. Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 23, nr 4, pp. 1737–1765. doi 10.1007/s10639-018-9690-x. (In Eng.).Guan C., Mou J., Jiang Z. Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Education: A Twenty-Year Data-Driven Historical Analysis // International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2020. Vol. 4, nr 4. P. 134–147. DOI 10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001.Guan C., Mou J., Jiang Z. Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Education: A Twenty-Year Data-Driven Historical Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2020, vol. 4, nr 4, pp. 134–147. doi 10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001. (In Eng.).Wanner T., Palmer E. Formative Self-and Peer Assessment for Improved Student Learning: The Crucial Factors of Design, Teacher Participation and Feedback // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018. Vol. 43, nr 7. P. 1032–1047. DOI 10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.Wanner T., Palmer E. Formative Self-and Peer Assessment for Improved Student Learning: The Crucial Factors of Design, Teacher Participation and Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 43, nr 7, pp. 1032– 1047. doi 10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698. (In Eng.).Anderson V., Gifford J., Wildman J. An Evaluation of Social Learning and Learner Outcomes in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): A Healthcare Sector Case Study // Human Resource Development International. 2020. Vol. 23, nr 3. P. 208–237. DOI 10.1080/13678868.2020.1721982.Anderson V., Gifford J., Wildman J. An Evaluation of Social Learning and Learner Outcomes in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): A Healthcare Sector Case Study. Human Resource Development International, 2020, vol. 23, nr 3, pp. 208–237. doi 10.1080/13678868.2020.1721982. (In Eng.).Bucovetchi O., Stanciu R. D., Simion C. P. Study on Designing a Curriculum Suitable for MOOC Platforms Starting Out the Romanian Students’ Expectations // Procedia Technology. 2016. Vol. 22. P. 1135–1141.Bucovetchi O., Stanciu R. D., Simion C. P. Study on Designing a Curriculum Suitable for MOOC Platforms Starting Out the Romanian Students’ Expectations. Procedia Technology, 2016, vol. 22, pp. 1135–1141. (In Eng.).Student’s Readiness in Using MOOC in Teaching and Learning Process / N. Zulkifli, F. B. M. Maidin, A. H. Abd Halim [et al.] // Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology. 2019. Vol. 2, nr 2. P. 42–47.Zulkifli N., Maidin F. B. M., Abd Halim A. H., Ali U. H., Kuthi H. A. Student’s Readiness in Using MOOC in Teaching and Learning Process. Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology, 2019, vol. 2, nr 2, pp. 42–47. (In Eng.).Queroda P. Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Readiness of Pangasinan State University – Open University Systems Students // International Journal on Open and Distance E-Learning. 2019. Vol. 5, nr 2. P. 39–47.Queroda P. Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Readiness of Pangasinan State University – Open University Systems Students. International Journal on Open and Distance E-Learning, 2019, vol. 5, nr 2, pp. 39–47. (In Eng.).Williams B., Brown T. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale // Nursing & Health Sciences. 2013. Vol. 15, nr 4. P. 430–436.Williams B., Brown T. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale. Nursing & Health Sciences, 2013, vol. 15, nr 4, pp. 430–436. (In Eng.).Fisher M. J., King J. The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education Revisited: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis // Nurse Education Today. 2010. Vol. 30, nr 1. P. 44–48.Fisher M. J., King J. The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education Revisited: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Nurse Education Today, 2010, vol. 30, nr 1, pp. 44–48. (In Eng.).Understanding MOOC Students: Motivations and Behaviours Indicative of MOOC Completion / B. K. Pursel, L. Zhang, K. W. Jablokow [et al.] // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2016. Vol. 32, nr 3. P. 202–217. DOI 10.1111/jcal.12131.Pursel B. K., Zhang L., Jablokow K. W., Choi G. W., Velegol D. Understanding MOOC Students: Motivations and Behaviours Indicative of MOOC Completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2016, vol. 32, nr 3, pp. 202–217. doi 10.1111/jcal.12131. (In Eng.).Jordan K. Massive Open Online Course Completion Rates Revisited: Assessment, Length and Attrition // International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015. Vol. 16, nr 3. P. 341–358. DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112.Jordan K. Massive Open Online Course Completion Rates Revisited: Assessment, Length and Attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2015, vol. 16, nr 3, pp. 341–358. doi 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112. (In Eng.).Reich J., Ruipérez-Valiente J. A. The MOOC Pivot // Science. 2019. Vol. 363, nr 6423. P. 130–131. DOI 10.1126/science.aav7958.Reich J., Ruipérez-Valiente J. A. The MOOC Pivot. Science, 2019, vol. 363, nr 6423, pp. 130–131. doi 10.1126/science.aav7958. (In Eng.).Goal Setting and MOOC Completion: A Study on the Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Student Performance in Massive Open Online Courses / E. Handoko, S. L. Gronseth, S. G. McNeil [et al.] // International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2019. Vol. 20, nr 3. P. 39–58. DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270.Handoko E., Gronseth S. L., McNeil S. G., Bonk C. J., Robin B. R. Goal Setting and MOOC Completion: A Study on the Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Student Performance in Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2019, vol. 20, nr 3, pp. 39–58. doi 10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270. (In Eng.).Рощина Я. М., Рощин С. Ю., Рудаков В. Н. Спрос на массовые открытые онлайн-курсы (MOOC): опыт российского образования // Вопросы образования. 2018. № 1. С. 174–199.Roshchina Ya. M., Roshchin S. Yu., Rudakov V. N. Spros na massovye otkrytye onlain-kursy (MOOC): opyt rossiiskogo obrazovaniya [The Demand for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC): Evidence from Russian Education]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2018, nr 1, pp. 174–199. (In Russ.).Хлебникова Н. А., Оконникова Т. И. Оценка и анализ цифровой грамотности педагогов и студентов вуза как фактора готовности к использованию дистанционных образовательных технологий // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия: Философия. Психология. Педагогика. 2020. Т. 30, № 4. С. 390–406. DOI 10.35634/2412-9550-2020-30-4-390-406.Khlebnikova N. A., Okonnikova T. I. Otsenka i analiz tsifrovoi gramotnosti pedagogov i studentov vuza kak faktora gotovnosti k ispol’zovaniyu distantsionnykh obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologii [Assessment and Analysis of Digital Literacy of Teachers and University Students as a Readiness Factor to use Distant Educational Technologies]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2020, vol. 30, nr 4, pp. 390–406. doi 10.35634/2412-9550-2020-30-4-390-406. (In Russ.).Треть россиян не умеют пользоваться порталами госуслуг // НАФИ. URL: http://nafi.ru/analytics/tretrossiyan-ne-umeyut-polzovatsya-portalami-gosuslug/ (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).Tret’ rossiyan ne umeyut pol’zovat’sya portalami gosuslug [A Third of the Russians Do Not Know How to Use Public Service Portals], available at: http://nafi.ru/analytics/tret-rossiyan-ne-umeyut-polzovatsya-portalami-gosuslug/ (accessed 27.01.2021). (In Russ.).Цифровая грамотность россиян: исследование 2020 // НАФИ. URL: http://nafi.ru/analytics/tsifrovayagramotnost-rossiyan-issledovanie-2020/ (дата обращения: 27.01.2021).Tsifrovaya gramotnost’ rossiyan: issledovanie 2020 [The Russians’ Digital Literacy: A 2020 Study], available at: http://nafi.ru/analytics/tsifrovaya-gramotnost-rossiyan-issledovanie-2020/ (accessed 27.01.2021). (In Russ.).Deursen A. J. A. M. van, Helsper E. J., Eynon R. Development and Validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS) // Information, Communication & Society. 2016. Vol. 19, nr 6. P. 804–823.Deursen A. J. A. M. van, Helsper E. J., Eynon R. Development and Validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 2016, vol. 19, nr 6, pp. 804–823. (In Eng.).Лысова Т. С. Пользование интернет-услугами и факторы, влияющие на их разнообразие // Вестник общественного мнения. Данные. Анализ. Дискуссии. 2018. № 1/2 (126). С. 133–144.Lysova T. S. Pol’zovanie internet-uslugami i faktory, vliyayushchie na ikh raznoobrazie [Use of Internet Services and Factors Affecting the Variety Thereof]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii, 2018, nr 1/2 (126), pp. 133–144. (In Russ.).Thomson D. L. Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students // Journal of Advanced Academics. 2010. Vol. 21, nr 4. P. 662–712. DOI 10.1177/1932202X1002100405.Thomson D. L. Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2010, vol. 21, nr 4, pp. 662–712. doi 10.1177/1932202X1002100405. (In Eng.).Keller H., Karau S. J. The Importance of Personality in Students’ Perceptions of the Online Learning Experience // Computers in Human Behavior. 2013. Vol. 29, nr 6. P. 2494–2500. DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007.Keller H., Karau S. J. The Importance of Personality in Students’ Perceptions of the Online Learning Experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, vol. 29, nr 6, pp. 2494–2500. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007. (In Eng.).Internet Use and Academic Success in University Students / J.-C. Torres-Díaz, J. M. Duart, H.-F. GómezAlvarado [et al.] // Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal. 2016. Vol. 24, nr 2. P. 61–70. DOI 10.3916/C48-2016-06.Torres-Díaz J.-C., Duart J. M., Gómez-Alvarado H.-F., Marín-Gutiérrez I., Segarra-Faggioni V. Internet Use and Academic Success in University Students. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 2016, vol. 24, nr 2, pp. 61–70. doi 10.3916/C48-2016-06. (In Eng.).The Impact of Digital Skills on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Performance Tests / L. Pagani, G. Argentin, M. Gui, L. Stanca // Educational Studies. 2016. Vol. 42, nr 2. P. 137–162. DOI 10.1080/03055698.2016.1148588.Pagani L., Argentin G., Gui M., Stanca L. The Impact of Digital Skills on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Performance Tests. Educational Studies, 2016, vol. 42, nr 2, pp. 137–162. doi 10.1080/03055698.2016.1148588. (In Eng.).Колосова О. А., Куликова О. А., Гришаева С. А. Место социальных сетей в бюджете времени современных студентов // Шаг в будущее: искусственный интеллект и цифровая экономика : Материалы 1-й Международной научно-практической конференции / Государственный университет управления. Москва, 2017. С. 44–49.Kolosova O. A., Kulikova O. A., Grishaeva S. A. Mesto sotsial’nykh setei v byudzhete vremeni sovremennykh studentov [The Place of Social Networks in the Time Budget of Modern Students]. In: Shag v budushchee: iskusstvennyi intellekt i tsifrovaya ekonomika : Materialy 1-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Moscow, 2017, pp. 44–49. (In Russ.).Griffiths M. D., Kuss D. J., Demetrovics Z. Social Networking Addiction: An Overview of Preliminary Findings // Behavioral Addictions. Criteria, Evidence, and Treatment / K. P. Rosenberg, L. C. Feder (eds.). Amsterdam : Academic Press, 2014. P. 119–141.Griffiths M. D., Kuss D. J., Demetrovics Z. Social Networking Addiction: An Overview of Preliminary Findings. In: K. P. Rosenberg, L. C. Feder (eds.), Behavioral addictions, Amsterdam, Academic Press, 2014, pp. 119–141. (In Eng.).Kochetkov N. V. Internet Addiction and Addiction to Computer Games in the Work of Russian Psychologists // Social Psychology and Society. 2020. Vol. 11, nr 1. P. 27–54. DOI 10.17759/sps.2020110103.Kochetkov N. V. Internet Addiction and Addiction to Computer Games in the Work of Russian Psychologists. Social Psychology and Society, 2020, vol. 11, nr 1, pp. 27–54. doi 10.17759/sps.2020110103. (In Eng.).Montag C., Reuter M., Markowetz A. The Impact of Psychoinformatics on Internet Addiction Including New Evidence // Internet Addiction: Neuroscientific Approaches and Therapeutical Implications Including Smartphone Addiction / C. Montag, M. Reuter (eds.). Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017. P. 221–229. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46276-9_13.Montag C., Reuter M., Markowetz A. The Impact of Psychoinformatics on Internet Addiction Including New Evidence. In: C. Montag, M. Reuter (eds.), Internet Addiction: Neuroscientific Approaches and Therapeutical Implications Including Smartphone Addiction, Springer, 2017, pp. 221–229. doi 10.1007/978-3-319-46276-9_13. (In Eng.).Akhter N. Relationship between Internet Addiction and Academic Performance among University Undergraduates // Educational Research and Reviews. 2013. Vol. 8, nr 19. P. 1793–1796. DOI 10.5897/ERR2013.1539.Akhter N. Relationship between Internet Addiction and Academic Performance among University Undergraduates. Educational Research and Reviews, 2013, vol. 8, nr 19, pp. 1793–1796. doi 10.5897/ERR2013.1539. (In Eng.).Асташова Т. А. Готовность российских студентов первого курса обучаться с использованием массовых открытых онлайн-курсов // Педагогика и психология образования. 2019. № 3. С. 126–135.Astashova T. A. Gotovnost’ rossiiskikh studentov pervogo kursa obuchat’sya s ispol’zovaniem massovykh otkrytykh onlain-kursov [Readiness of First-Year Students of Russian Universities to Study Using Massive Open Online Courses]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya, 2019, nr 3, pp. 126–135. (In Russ.)Ядровская М. В., Поркшеян М. В. О применении электронных курсов в обучении // Образовательные технологии и общество. 2019. Т. 22, № 3. С. 3–15.Yadrovskaya M. V., Porksheyan M. V. O primenenii elektronnykh kursov v obuchenii [On Using E-Courses in Education]. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii i obshchestvo, 2019, vol. 22, nr 3, pp. 3–15. (In Russ.).Головчин М. А. Институциональные ловушки цифровизации российского высшего образования // Высшее образование в России. 2021. № 3. С. 59–75.Golovchin M. A. Institutsional’nye lovushki tsifrovizatsii rossiiskogo vysshego obrazovaniya [Institutional Traps of Digitalization of Russian Higher Education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2021, nr 3, pp. 59–75. (In Russ.).Российские вузы переходят на онлайн обучение из-за коронавируса // Интерфакс – Высшее образование в России. URL: academia.interfax.ru//ru/news/articles/4311/ (дата обращения: 11.09.2020).Rossiiskie vuzy perekhodyat na onlain obuchenie iz-za koronavirusa [Russian Universities Switch to Online Education due to Coronavirus], available at: academia.interfax.ru//ru/news/articles/4311/ (accessed 11.09.2020). (In Russ.).Опорному вузу открыт бесплатный доступ к онлайн-курсам Coursera. URL: https://donstu.ru/news/obrazovanie/opornomu-vuzu-otkryt-besplatnyy-dostup-konlayn-kursam-coursera (дата обращения: 11.09.2020).Opornomu vuzu otkryt besplatnyi dostup k onlainkursam Coursera [The Flagship University Has Got Free Access to Coursera], available at: https://donstu.ru/news/obrazovanie/opornomu-vuzu-otkryt-besplatnyy-dostup-k-onlayn-kursam-coursera (accessed 11.09.2020). (In Russ.).Candarli D., Yuksel H. G. Students’ Perceptions of Video-Conferencing in the Classrooms in Higher Education // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 47. P. 357–361. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663.Candarli D., Yuksel H. G. Students’ Perceptions of Video-Conferencing in the Classrooms in Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 47, pp. 357–361. doi 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663. (In Eng.).Themelis C. From VideoConferencing to Holoportation and Haptics: How Emerging Technologies Can Enhance Presence in Online Education? // Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum : Bridging Human and Machine: Future Education with Intelligence / S. Yu, M. Ally, A. Tsinakos (eds.). Singapore : Springer, 2020. P. 261–276. DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_16.Themelis C., Sime J.-A. From Video-Conferencing to Holoportation and Haptics: How Emerging Technologies Can Enhance Presence in Online Education? In: S. Yu, M. Ally, A. Tsinakos (eds.), Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum : Bridging Human and Machine: Future Education with Intelligence, Springer, 2020, pp. 261–276. doi 10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_16. (In Eng.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.