umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2021.01.002umj-1323Research ArticleУПРАВЛЕНИЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫМ ПРОЦЕССОМMANAGING EDUCATIONAL PROCESSСовременный опыт инженерно-технической подготовки в ведущих зарубежных университетахBest Practices of Engineering Training in World Leading UniversitiesЛидерА. М.LiderA. M.

Лидер Андрей Маркович – доктор технических наук,  профессор, заведующий кафедрой – руководитель отделения экспериментальной физики Инженерной школы ядерных  технологий

634050, Томск, проспект Ленина, 30, главный корпус ТПУ

Andrey M. Lider – Dr. hab. (Engineering), Professor, Head of  Department of Experimental Physics, TPU School of Nuclear Science and Engineering

30 Lenin ave., Tomsk, 634050

lider@tpu.ruСлесаренкоИ. В.SlesarenkoI. V.

Слесаренко Инга Валерьевна – кандидат педагогических наук,  доцент учебно-научного центра организации и технологий  высшего профессионального образования

634050, Томск, проспект Ленина, 30, главный корпус ТПУ

Inga V. Slesarenko – PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Training and Research Center for University Management

30 Lenin ave., Tomsk, 634050

slessare@tpu.ruСоловьевМ. А.SolovyevM. A.

Соловьев Михаил Александрович – кандидат технических наук,  доцент, проректор по образовательной деятельности

634050, Томск, проспект Ленина, 30, главный корпус ТПУ

Mikhail A. Solovyev – PhD (Engineering), Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs

30 Lenin ave., Tomsk, 634050

solo@tpu.ruНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университетРоссияNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityRussian Federation2021010520212511834Copyright © Лидер А.М., Слесаренко И.В., Соловьев М.А., 20212021Лидер А.М., Слесаренко И.В., Соловьев М.А.Lider A.M., Slesarenko I.V., Solovyev M.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1323

В статье-обзоре освещаются лучшие образовательные практики инженерно-технической подготовки в ведущих зарубежных университетах. Рассматривается современный контекст инженерно-технической подготовки, анализируются ожидания и запросы различных участников образовательного процесса, в том числе представителей промышленности. Основной задачей исследования являлось изучение лучших образовательных практик ведущих зарубежных университетов в области инженерно-технической подготовки, анализ образовательных политик университетов и поддерживающих их реализацию мероприятий. Обсуждаются нововведения в образовательной политике вузов, чей опыт инженерно-технической подготовки определяется новыми задачами реформирования образовательных программ посредством внедрения новых технологий активного, проектного, проблемного обучения с целью формирования у студентов ключевых профессиональных и востребованных межотраслевых профессионально значимых компетенций. Приводятся примеры организации учебного процесса в зарубежных университетах в сотрудничестве с работодателями, а также интегрированная в реальную производственную деятельность подготовка профессорско-преподавательского состава.Выводы авторов относительно изменений современного состояния инженерно-технической подготовки в ведущих зарубежных университетах представлены в рекомендательном ключе с целью возможного пилотирования и интеграции лучших практик в образовательную деятельность по подготовке инженеров в российских университетах.

The paper reviews best educational practices in engineering training provided by world leading universities. Modern landscape of engineering training and education has been viewed; expectations and needs of different stakeholders of educational process have been considered, including those of industry representatives. The main purpose of our research is to study the educational practices of the world leading universities in engineering training, to analyze educational policies and training measures supporting their realisation. There are considered the innovations in educational policies of the universities whose experience in engineering training is determined by new objectives of reforming degree programmes via integrating new technologies of active, project-based, and problem-based learning in order to develop students’ key professional competences and generic skills. The examples of curriculum planning in collaboration with employers are viewed. The university staff training integrated into real industry operating is considered. The authors’ conclusions on the changes in the current state of engineering training are presented in the form of advice, with the orientation towards prospective piloting and integration of the best practices into engineering education in Russian universities.

инженерно-техническая подготовкапрофессиональные компетенциимежотраслевые профессионально значимые компетенциипрактико-ориентированное обучениесамостоятельная работаполитика образовательной деятельности университетаengineering trainingprofessional competencesgeneric skillspractice-based trainingindependent studiesuniversity education policyReferencesMejtoft T., Vesterberg J. Integration of Generic Skills in Engineering Education: Increased Student Engagement. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary. Calgary, Canada, 2017. June 18–22 // CDIO. Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate : [сайт]. URL: http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/integration-generic-skills-engineering-education-increasedstudent (дата обращения: 07.08.2019).Mejtoft T., Vesterberg J. Integration of Generic Skills in Engineering Education: Increased Student Engagement, available at: http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/integration-generic-skills-engineering-education-increased-student (accessed 07.08.2019). (In Eng.).Coskin S., Kayikci Ya., Gencay E. Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision // Technologies. 2019. Vol. 7, Article number 10. P. 1–13. DOI 10.3390/technologies7010010.Coskin S., Kayikci Ya., Gencay E. Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies, 2019, vol. 7, Article nr 10, pp. 1–13. doi 10.3390/technologies7010010. (In Eng.).Сысоев А. А., Весна Е. Б., Александров Ю. И. О современной модели инженерной подготовки // Высшее образование в России. 2019. Т. 28, № 7. C. 94–101. DOI 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-94-101.Sysoev A. A., Vesna E. B., Aleksandrov Yu. I. O sovremennoi modeli inzhenernoi podgotovki [About a New Model of Engineering Training]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2019, vol. 28, nr 7, pp. 94–101. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-94-101. (In Russ.).Чучалин А. И. Инженерное образование в эпоху индустриальной революции и цифровой экономики // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27, № 10. С. 47–62. DOI 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-10-47-62.Chuchalin A. I. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie v epokhy industrial’noi i zhifrovoi ekonomiki [Engineering Education in the Epoch of Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2018, vol. 27, nr 10, pp. 47–62. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-10-47-62. (In Russ.).Chuchalin A. I. The CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering Programs // Higher Education in Russia. 2019. Vol. 28, nr 10. P. 58–72. DOI 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-58-72.Chuchalin A. I. The CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2019, vol. 28. nr 10, pp. 58–72. doi 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-58-72. (In Eng.).Gant M., Booth A. A. A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies // Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009. Vol. 26, nr 2. P. 91–108. DOI 10.1111/j.1471–1842.2009.00848.x.Gant M., Booth A. A. Topology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 2009, vol. 26, nr 2, pp. 91–108. doi 10.1111/j.1471–1842.2009.00848.x. (In Eng.).Раицкая Л. К., Тихонова Е. В. Обзор как перспективный вид научной публикации: его типы и характеристики // Научный редактор и издатель. 2019. Том 4, № 3/4. C. 131–139. DOI 10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-131-139.Raitskaya L. L., Tikhonova E. V. Obzor kak perspektivnyi vid nauchnoi publikatsii: ego tipy i kharakteristiki [Reviews as a Promising Kind of Scholarly Publication, Its Types and Characteristics]. Nauchnyi redaktor i izdatel’ [Science Editor and Publisher], 2019, vol. 4, nr 3/4, pp. 131–139. doi 10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-131-139. (In Russ.).Раицкая Л. К., Тихонова Е. В. Обзор обзоров как инструмент выявления трендов в исследуемой области знания // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29, № 3. C. 37–57. DOI 10/31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57.Raitskaya L. L., Tikhonova E. V. Obzor obzorov kak instrument vyyavleniya trendov v issleduemoi oblasti znaniya [An Overview of Reviews as a Trend Maker in the Field]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2020, vol. 29, nr 3, pp. 37–57. doi 10/31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57. (In Russ.).Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework // International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2005. Vol. 8, nr 1. P. 19–32. DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616.Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 2005, vol. 8, nr 1, pp. 19–32. doi 10.1080/1364557032000119616. (In Eng.).A Scoping Review to Understand Simulation Used in Interprofessional Education / C. A. Lee, K. Pais, S. Kelling, O. S. Anderson // Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice. 2018. Vol. 13. P. 15–23. DOI 10.1016/j.xjep.2018.08.003.Lee C. A., Pais K., Kelling S., Anderson O. S. A Scoping Review to Understand Simulation Used in Interprofessional Education. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 2018, vol. 13, pp. 15–23. doi 10.1016/j.xjep.2018.08.003. (In Eng.).Performance Trajectory of Students in the Engineering Disciplines / K. M. Orr, I. Ngambeki, R. A. Long, M. W. Ohland // Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference. 2011. P. 1720–1723. DOI 10.1109/FIE.2011.6143005.Orr K. M., Ngambeki I., Long R. A., Ohland M. W. Performance Trajectory of Students in the Engineering Disciplines. Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference, 2011, pp. 1720 –1723. doi 10.1109/FIE.2011.6143005. (In Eng.).Rabinovitch J., Parziale N. The Caltech Space Challenge: Lessons Learnt and Future Plans // 65th International Astronautical Congress. Toronto, Canada, 2014. P. 1–8.R abi nov itch J., Pa r ziale N. T he Caltech Space Challenge: Lessons Learnt and Future Plans. 65th International Astronautical Congress, Toronto, Canada, 2014, pp. 1–8. (In Eng.).Maunder R. G. Innovation in the Undergraduate Microelectronics Programmes at the University of Southampton // 11th European Workshop on Microelectronics Education (EWME). Southampton, 2016. P. 1–6. DOI 10.1109/EWME.2016.7496459.Maunder R. G. Innovation in the Undergraduate Microelectronics Programmes at the University of Southampton. 11th European Workshop on Microelectronics Education (EWME), Southampton, 2016, pp. 1– 6. doi 10.1109/EWME.2016.7496459. (In Eng.).Oriogun P., Haynes R., French F. Using the Enhanced Problem-based Learning Grid: Three Multimedia Case Studies. Winds of Changing in the Sea of Learning, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Auckland, New Zealand, 2002. P. 8–11.Oriogun P., Haynes R., French F. Using the Enhanced Problem-based Learning Grid: Three Multimedia Case Studies. Winds of Changing in the Sea of Learning, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Auckland, New Zealand, 2002, pp. 8–11. (In Eng.).Iridis-pi: A Low-Cost, Compact Demonstration Cluster / S. J. Cox, J. T. Cox, R. Boardman [et al.] // Cluster Computing. 2014. Vol. 17. P. 349–358. DOI 10.1007/s10586-013-0282-7.Cox S. J., Cox J. T., Boardman R., Ossont S., Scott M., O’Brien N. Iridis-pi: A Low-Cost, Compact Demonstration Cluster. Cluster Computing, 2014, vol. 17, pp. 349–358. doi 10.1007/s10586-013-0282-7. (In Eng.).Rosen M. A. Engineering Education: Future Trends and Advances // Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education (EDUCATION’09). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS). Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2009. P. 44–52. DOI 10.5555/1864130.Rosen M. A. Engineering Education: Future Trends and Advances. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education (EDUCATION’09), Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2009, pp. 44–52. doi 10.5555/1864130. (In Eng.).Rewani R., Alam M. A Comparative Review on Generic Attributes in Engineering Education of Different Country // Proceedings of the Joint 8th IFEE2017 and 3rd TSDIC2017 Conferences, April 8–20, 2017. Shariah, United Arab Emirates, 2017. P. 1–10.Rewani R., Alam M. A Comparative Review on Generic Attributes in Engineering Education of Different Country. Proceedings of the Joint 8th IFEE2017 and 3rd TSDIC2017 Conferences, Shariah, United Arab Emirates, April 8–20, 2017, pp. 1–10. (In Eng.).Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: a Theoretical Review and Approach / M. Bostroem, E. Andersson, M. Berf [et al.] // Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10, nr. 12. P. 44–79. DOI 10.3390/su10124479.Bostroem M., Andersson E., Berf M., Gustafsoon K., Hysing E. Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: a Theoretical Review and Approach. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, nr 12, pp. 44–79. doi 10.3390/su10124479. (In Eng.).Design Engineering Competencies: Future Requirements and Predicted Changes in the Forthcoming Decade / M. A. Robinson, P. Sparrow, Ch. Clegg, K. Birdi // Design Studies. 2005. Vol. 26, nr 2. P. 123–153. DOI 10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.004.Robinson M. A., Sparrow P., Clegg Ch., Birdi K. Design Engineering Competencies: Future Requirements and Predicted Changes in the Forthcoming Decade. Design Studies, 2005, vol. 26, nr 2, pp. 123–153. doi 10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.004. (In Eng.).‘Mission Employable’: Creating a Student-led Employability Strategy for the Faculty of Humanities, University of Southampton / Ch. Medland, J. Tribe, A. Dudley [et al.] // Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change. 2015. Vol. 1, nr 1. DOI 10.21100/jeipc.v1i1.207.Medland Ch., Tribe J., Dudley A., Smith V., Quince E. ‘Mission Employable’: Creating a Student-led Employability Strategy for the Faculty of Humanities, University of Southampton. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2015, vol. 1, nr 1. doi 10.21100/jeipc.v1i1.207. (In Eng.).Preecha T., Lester G., Urairat M. A Study of Students’ Conception of Problem Situations: Using Conceptualization in Scenario-Based Learning // G. Hanke, M. Spaniol, K. Osathanunkul [et al.] (eds.). Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2018. Vol. 11007. Springer Verlag, 2018. P. 47–53. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-96565-9_5.Preecha T., Lester G., Urairat M. A Study of Students’ Conception of Problem Situations: Using Conceptualization in Scenario-Based Learning. In: G. Hanke, M. Spaniol, K. Osathanunkul, S. Unankard, R. Klamma (eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2018, vol. 11007, Springer Verlag, 2018, pp. 47–53. doi 10.1007/978-3-319-96565-9_5. (In Eng.).Runge W. Technology Entrepreneurship. A Treatise on Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship for and in Technology Ventures. Vol. 2. Karlsruher Institut fur Technologie (KIT), 2014. 642 p. DOI 10.5445/KSP/1000036460.Runge W. Technology Entrepreneurship. A Treatise on Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurship for and in Technology Ventures, 2014, vol. 2, KIT Scientific Publishing, 642 p. doi 10.5445/KSP/1000036460. (In Eng.).DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). Excellence Initiative at a Glance. Bonn : Brandt GmbH Druckerei und Verlag, 2013. 124 p.DFG ( Deut sche For schu ngsgemei nschaf t). Excellence Initiative at a Glance, Bonn, Brandt GmbH Druckerei und Verlag, 2013. 124 p. (In Eng.).Möller T., Schmidt M., Hornbostel S. Assessing the Effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Methods // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 109, nr 3. P. 2217–2239. DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-2090-3.Möller T., Schmidt M., Hornbostel S. Assessing the Effects of the German Excellence Initiative with Bibliometric Methods. Scientometrics, 2016, vol. 109, nr. 3, pp. 2217–2239. doi 10.1007/s11192-016-2090-3. (In Eng.).Influencing Variables and Moderators of Transfer of Learning to the Workplace within the Area of Staff Development in Higher Education: Research Review / C. Rijdt de, A. Stes, C. Vleuten van der, F. Duchy // Educational Research Review. 2013. Nr. 8. P. 48–74. DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007.Rijdt C. de, Stes A., Vleuten C. van der, Duchy F. Influencing Variables and Moderators of Transfer of Learning to the Workplace within the Area of Staff Development in Higher Education: Research Review. Educational Research Review, 2013, nr 8, pp. 48–74. doi 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007. (In Eng.).Другова Е. А. Ключевые характеристики программ преподавательского совершенства для академических лидеров. Обзор опыта высокорейтинговых университетов на материале зарубежных публикаций // Вопросы образования. 2019. № 4. С. 8–29. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-8-29.Drugova Е. А. Klyuchevye kharakteristiki programm prepodavatel’skogo sovershenstva dlya akademicheskikh liderov [The Key Characteristics of Teaching Excellence Programs for Academic Leaders. A Review of High-Ranking Universities’ Experiences Reflected in International Publications]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2019, nr 4, pp. 8–29. doi 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-8-29. (In Russ.).Baran E., Correia A.-P., Thompson A. Transforming Online Teaching Practice: Critical Analysis of the Literature on the Roles and Competences of Online Teachers // Distance Education. 2011. Vol. 32, nr 3. P. 421–439. DOI 10.1080/01587919.2011.610293.Baran E., Correia A.-P., Thompson A. Transforming Online Teaching Practice: Critical Analysis of the Literature on the Roles and Competences of Online Teachers. Distance Education, 2011, vol. 32, nr 3, pp. 421–439. doi 10.1080/01587919.2011.610293. (In Eng.).Torres J. T., Higheagle Strong Z., Adesope O. Reflection through Assessment: A Systematic Narrative Review of Teacher Feedback and Student Self-Perception // Studies in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 64, Article 100814. P. 1–7. DOI 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100814.Torres J. T., Higheagle Strong Z., Adesope O. Reflection through Assessment: A Systematic Narrative Review of Teacher Feedback and Student Self-Perception. Studies in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 64, Article 100814, pp. 1–7. doi 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100814. (In Eng.).Influencing Academic Motivation: The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction / T. Trolian, E. Jach, J. Hanson, E. Pascarella // Journal of College Student Development. 2016. Vol. 57, nr 7. P. 810–826. DOI 10.1353/csd.2016.0080.Trolian T., Jach E., Hanson J., Pascarella E. Inf luencing Academic Motivation: The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction. Journal of College Student Development, 2016, vol. 57, nr 7, pp. 810–826. doi 10.1353/csd.2016.0080 (In Eng.).Hagenauer G., Volet Simone E. Teacher – Student Relationship at University: an Important yet UnderResearched Field // Oxford Review Education. 2014. Vol. 40, nr 3. P. 370–388. DOI 10.1080/03054985.2014.921613.Hagenauer G., Volet Simone E. Teacher – Student Relationship at University: an Important yet UnderResearched Field. Oxford Review Education, 2014, vol. 40, nr 3, pp. 370–388. doi 10.1080/03054985.2014.921613. (In Eng.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.