umjУниверситетское управление: практика и анализUniversity Management: Practice and Analysis1999-66401999-6659Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and10.15826/umpa.2020.04.033umj-1287Research ArticleЭТИЧЕСКИЕ ЦЕННОСТИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТАETHICAL VALUES WITHIN THE UNIVERSITYПолитика российских вузов в отношении академического мошенничества студентов: наказание или воспитание?Russian University Policies on Students` Academic Dishonesty: Punishment or Ethical Traininghttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6434-2251ДремоваО. В.DremovaO. V.

Дремова Оксана Викторовна – аналитик Института образования

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 11

Oksana V. Dremova – Analyst, Institute of Education

11 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000

odremova@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation2020260220212443045Copyright © Дремова О.В., 20212021Дремова О.В.Dremova O.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1287

Практики нечестного поведения студентов – одна из значимых проблем высшего образования во всем мире. Поэтому руководители и администрации вузов стараются разрабатывать меры борьбы с нечестностью студентов, направленные как на наказание обучающихся, так и на формирование у них ценностей честного поведения, причем за рубежом начинают набирать популярность ценностные меры. В рамках данной исследовательской статьи используется дискурс-анализ для изучения этических документов и публичных высказываний руководителей российских вузов, участвующих в Проекте 5-100 (всего в нашу выборку включен 21 вуз). Проведенный анализ позволил понять, какие дискурсы, аргументации и способы их лингвистической репрезентации используются российскими вузами для формирования честного поведения студентов и репрезентации своей позиции в отношении академического мошенничества. Излагаемая в статье информация помогает выделить дискурсы, которым следуют российские вузы, и оценить, насколько эти дискурсы понятны и близки студентам. В практическом плане статья будет полезна администраторам и руководителям российских вузов, а также исследователям академического мошенничества для анализа и формирования стратегий борьбы с нечестностью студентов.

Students’ dishonest behavior is one of the most significant problems of higher education all over the world. Therefore, researchers and university administrators attempt to develop corresponding prevention measures. The measures can be aimed at either punishing students or engaging them in ethically sustainable academic practices, the second type becoming more and more popular in universities abroad. In this paper, discourse analysis is used to explore university policies and public statements of the rectors of Russian universities participating in the 5–100 project. The analysis helps to understand what kinds of discourses, argumentation and ways of their linguistic representation are used by Russian universities to represent their position towards students’ academic dishonesty and to influence students’ behavior. This paper might be of use for university administrators and managers, as well as for those who professionally investigate students’ academic dishonesty, to analyze and reform strategies for students’ dishonesty prevention.

высшее образованиеакадемическое мошенничествоэтические документы вузадискурс-анализкарательный дискурсценностный дискурсhigher educationacademic dishonestyuniversity’s ethical policiesdiscourse analysispunitive discoursevalue discourseПубликация подготовлена на основании исследования (№ 21-04-063), проведенного в рамках Программы «Научный фонд Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики» (НИУ ВШЭ)».The publication was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the HSE University in 2021 (grant № 21-04-063).ReferencesMaloshonok N., Shmeleva E. Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities // Journal of Academic Ethics. 2019. Vol. 17, nr 3. P. 313–329. DOI 10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y.Maloshonok N., Shmeleva E. Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2019, vol. 17, nr 3, рр. 313–329. doi 10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y. (In Eng.).Шмелева Е. Д. Академическое мошенничество в современных университетах: обзор теоретических подходов и результатов эмпирических исследований // Экономическая социология. 2015. Т. 16, № 2. С. 55–79.Shmeleva E. D. Akademicheskoe moshennichestvo v sovremennykh universitetakh: obzor teoreticheskikh podkhodov i rezul’tatov empiricheskikh issledovanii [Academic Dishonesty in Modern Universities: A Review of Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology], 2015, vol. 16, nr 2, pp. 55–79. (In Russ.)McCabe D. L., Treviño L. K., Butterfield K. D. Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research // Ethics & Behavior. 2001. Vol. 11, nr 3. P. 219–232. DOI 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.McCabe D. L., Treviño L. K., Butterfield K. D. Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 2001, vol. 11, nr 3, рр. 219–232. doi 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2. (In Eng.).Marsden H., Carroll M., Neill J. T. Who Cheats at University? A Self-Report Study of Dishonest Academic Behaviours in a Sample of Australian University Students // Australian Journal of Psychology. 2005. Vol. 57, nr 1. P. 1–10. DOI 10.1080/00049530412331283426.Marsden H., Carroll M., Neill J. T. Who Cheats at University? A Self-Report Study of Dishonest Academic Behaviours in a Sample of Australian University Students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2005, vol. 57, nr 1, рр. 1–10. doi 10.1080/00049530412331283426. (In Eng.).Starovoytova D., Arimi M. Witnessing of Cheating-inExams Behavior and Factors Sustaining Integrity // Journal of Education and Practice. 2017. Vol. 8, nr 10. P. 127–141.Starovoytova D., Arimi M. Witnessing of Cheatingin-Exams Behavior and Factors Sustaining Integrity. Journal of Education and Practice, 2017, vol. 8, nr 10, рр. 127–141. (In Eng.).Whitley Jr. B. E., Keith-Spiegel P. Academic Dishonesty: An Educator’s Guide. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. 169 p.Whitley Jr. B. E., Keith-Spiegel P. Academic Dishonesty: An Educator’s Guide, Mahwah (NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002, 169 p. (In Eng.).Cizek G. J. Detecting and Preventing Classroom Cheating: Promoting Integrity in Assessment. Thousand Oaks, California : Corwin Press, 2003. 168 p.Cizek G. J. Detecting and Preventing Classroom Cheating: Promoting Integrity in Assessment, Thousand Oaks (California), Corwin Press, 2003, 168 p. (In Eng.).Tolerance of Cheating: An Analysis Across Countries / J. R. Magnus, V. M. Polterovich, D. L. Danilov, A. V. Savvateev // The Journal of Economic Education. 2002. Vol. 33, nr 2. P. 125–135. DOI 10.1080/00220480209596462.Magnus J. R., Polterovich V. M., Danilov D. L., Savvateev A. V. Tolerance of Cheating: An Analysis Across Countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 2002, vol. 33, nr 2, рр. 125–135. doi 10.1080/00220480209596462. (In Eng.).Adebayo S. O. Common Cheating Behaviour among Nigerian University Students: A Case Study of University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria // World Journal of Education. 2011. Vol. 1, nr 1. P. 144–149. DOI 10.5430/wje.v1n1p144.Adebayo S. O. Common Cheating Behaviour among Nigerian University Students: A Case Study of University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 2011, vol. 1, nr 1, рр. 144–149. doi 10.5430/wje.v1n1p144. (In Eng.).Sutherland-Smith W. Crime and Punishment: An Analysis of University Plagiarism Policies // Semiotica. 2011. Vol. 2011, nr 187. P. 127–139. DOI 10.1515/semi.2011.067.Sutherland-Smith W. Crime and Punishment: An Analysis of University Plagiarism Policies. Semiotica, 2011, vol. 2011, nr 187, рр. 127–139. doi 10.1515/semi.2011.067. (In Eng.).Arnold R., Martin B. N., Bigby L. Is There a Relationship between Honor Codes and Academic Dishonesty? // Journal of College and Character. 2007. Vol. 8, nr 2. P. 1–20. DOI 10.2202/1940-1639.1164.Arnold R., Martin B. N., Bigby L. Is There a Relationship between Honor Codes and Academic Dishonesty? Journal of College and Character, 2007, vol. 8, nr 2, pp. 1–20. doi 10.2202/1940-1639.1164. (In Eng.).McCabe D. L., Butterfield K. D., Treviño L. K. Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do about It. Baltimore : JHU Press, 2012. 225 p.McCabe D. L., Butterfield K. D., Treviño L. K. Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do about It, Baltimore, JHU Press, 2012, 225 p. (In Eng.).Jones D. L. R. Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? // Business Communication Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 74, nr 2. P. 141–150.Jones D. L. R. Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 2011, vol. 74, nr 2, рр. 141–150. (In Eng.).Радаев В. В., Чириков И. С. Отношение студентов и преподавателей к наказаниям за плагиат и списывание // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2006. № 4. С. 77–82.Radaev V. V., Chirikov I. S. Otnoshenie studentov i prepodavatelei k nakazaniyam za plagiat i spisyvanie [The Attitude of the Students and the Faculty to the Penalties for Plagiarism]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2006, nr 4, рр. 77–82. (In Russ.).Сивак Е. В. Преступление в аудитории. Детерминанты нечестного поведения студентов (плагиата и списывания). Препринт WP10/2006/06. Москва : ГУ ВШЭ, 2006. 44 с.Sivak E. Prestuplenie v auditorii. Determinanty nechestnogo povedeniya studentov (plagiata i spisyvaniya) [Crime in the Classroom. Determinants of Students’ Cheating Behavior (Copying and Plagiarism)], Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2006, 44 p. (In Russ.).Голунов С. В. Студенческий плагиат как вызов системе высшего образования в России и за рубежом // Вопросы образования. 2010. № 3. С. 243–256.Golunov S. Studencheskii plagiat kak vyzov sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii i za rubezhom [Students’ Plagiarism as a Challenge to the System Higher Education in Russia and Abroad]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2010, nr 3, рр. 243–257. (In Russ.).Шмелева Е. Д., Семенова Т. В. Академическое мошенничество студентов: учебная мотивация vs образовательная среда // Вопросы образования. 2019. № 3. С. 101–129.Shmeleva E., Semenova T. Akademicheskoe moshennichestvo studentov: uchebnaya motivatsiya vs obrazovatel’naya sreda [Academic Dishonesty among College Students: Academic Motivation vs Contextual Factors]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2019, nr 3, pp. 101–129. (In Russ.).Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students in Online and Face-to-Face Courses / Y. Peled, Y. Eshet, C. Barczyk, K. Grinautski // Computers & Education. 2019. Vol. 131. P. 49–59.Peled Y., Eshet Y., Barczyk C., Grinautski K. Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students in Online and Face-to-Face Courses. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 131, pp. 49–59. (In Eng.).Altbach P. G. What Counts for Academic Productivity in Research Universities? // International Higher Education. 2015. Nr 79. P. 6–7.Altbach P. G. What Counts for Academic Productivity in Research Universities? International Higher Education, 2015, nr 79, рр. 6–7. (In Eng.).Kara F., MacAlister D. Responding to Academic Dishonesty in Universities: a Restorative Justice Approach // Contemporary Justice Review. 2010. Vol. 13, nr 4. P. 443–453. DOI 10.1080/10282580.2010.517981.Kara F., MacAlister D. Responding to Academic Dishonesty in Universities: a Restorative Justice Approach. Contemporary Justice Review, 2010, vol. 13, nr 4, рр. 443–453. doi 10.1080/10282580.2010.517981. (In Eng.).Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. The Role of Faculty in Reducing Academic Dishonesty among Engineering Students // Studies in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 45, nr 12. P. 2464–2480.Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. The Role of Faculty in Reducing Academic Dishonesty among Engineering Students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 45, nr 12, pp. 2464–2480. (In Eng.).Higbee J. L., Thomas P. V. Student and Faculty Perceptions of Behaviors that Constitute Cheating // NASPA journal. 2002. Vol. 40, nr 1. P. 39–52. DOI 10.2202/1949-6605.1187.Higbee J. L., Thomas P. V. Student and Faculty Perceptions of Behaviors that Constitute Cheating. NASPA Journal, 2002, vol. 40, nr 1, рр. 39–52. doi 10.2202/1949-6605.1187. (In Eng.).McCabe D. L., Treviño L. K. Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences // The Journal of Higher Education. 1993. Vol. 64, nr 5. P. 522–538. DOI 10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446.McCabe D. L., Treviño L. K. Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 1993, vol. 64, nr 5, рр. 522–538. doi 10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446. (In Eng.).Macdonald R., Carroll J. Plagiarism – a Complex Issue Requiring a Holistic Institutional Approach // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006. Vol. 31, nr 2. P. 233–245. DOI 10.1080/02602930500262536.Macdonald R., Carroll J. Plagiarism – a Complex Issue Requiring a Holistic Institutional Approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2006, vol. 31, nr 2, рр. 233–245. doi 10.1080/02602930500262536. (In Eng.).Ely J. J., Henderson L., Wachsman Y. Testing the Effectiveness of the University Honor Code // Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 2014. Vol. 18, nr 3. P. 1–10.Ely J. J., Henderson L., Wachsman Y. Testing the Effectiveness of the University Honor Code. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 2014, vol. 18, nr 3, рр. 1–10. (In Eng.).O’Neill H. M., Pfeiffer P. A. The Impact of Honour Codes and Perceptions of Cheating on Academic Cheating Behaviours, Especially for MBA Bound Undergraduates // Accounting Education. 2012. Vol. 21, nr 3. P. 231–245. DOI 10.1080/09639284.2011.590012.O’Neill H. M., Pfeiffer P. A. The Impact of Honour Codes and Perceptions of Cheating on Academic Cheating Behaviours, Especially for MBA Bound Undergraduates. Accounting Education, 2012, vol. 21, nr 3, рр. 231–245. doi 10.1080/09639284.2011.590012. (In Eng.).Measuring and Maximizing the Effectiveness of Honor Codes in Online Courses / H. Corrigan-Gibbs, N. Gupta, C. Northcutt [et al.] // Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. New York, NY : Association for Computing Machinery, 2015. P. 223–228. DOI 10.1145/2724660.2728663.Corrigan-Gibbs H., Gupta N., Northcutt C. et al. Measuring and Maximizing the Effectiveness of Honor Codes in Online Courses. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Ney York (NY), Association for Computing Machinery, 2015, рр. 223–228. doi 10.1145/2724660.2728663. (In Eng.).Academic Integrity and Community Ties at a Small, Religious-Affiliated Liberal Arts College / M. Bath, P. Hovde, E. George [et al.] // International Journal for Educational Integrity. 2014. Vol. 10, nr 2. P. 31–43. DOI 10.21913/IJEI.v10i2.1005.Bath M., Hovde P., George E. et al. Academic Integrity and Community Ties at a Small, Religious-Affiliated Liberal Arts College. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2014, vol. 10, nr 2, рр. 31–43. doi 10.21913/IJEI.v10i2.1005. (In Eng.).Lupton R. A., Chaqman K. J. Russian and American College Students’ Attitudes, Perceptions and Tendencies Towards Cheating // Educational Research. 2002. Vol. 44, nr 1. P. 17–27. DOI 10.1080/00131880110081080.Lupton R. A., Chaqman K. J. Russian and American College Students’ Attitudes, Perceptions and Tendencies Towards Cheating. Educational Research, 2002, vol. 44, nr 1, рр. 17–27. doi 10.1080/00131880110081080. (In Eng.).Пимонова P. А., Фомина Е. М. Повышение привлекательности российских вузов для иностранных студентов // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2018. Т. 22, № 4 (116). С. 97–109. DOI 10.15826/umpa.2018.04.043.Pimonova S. A., Fomina E. M. Povyshenie privlekatel’nosti rossiiskikh vuzov dlya inostrannykh studentov [Growing Attractiveness of Russian Universities for International Students]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2018, vol. 22, nr 4 (116), рр. 97–109. doi 10.15826/umpa.2018.04.043. (In Russ.).Denisova-Schmidt E. The Challenges of Academic Integrity in Higher Education: Current Trends and Prospects. Chestnut Hill, MA : The Boston College Center for International Higher Education (CIHE), 2017. 26 p.Denisova-Schmidt E. The Challenges of Academic Integrity in Higher Education: Current Trends and Prospects, Chestnut Hill (MA), The Boston College Center for International Higher Education (CIHE), 2017, 26 p. (In Eng.).Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research // Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2001. Vol. 5, nr 11. P. 121–138.Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2001, vol. 5, nr 11, рр. 121–138. (In Eng.).Костомаров В. Г. Наш язык в действии. Москва : Гардарики, 2005. 266 с.Kostomarov V. G. Nash yazyk v deistvii [Our Language in Use], Moscow, Gardariki, 2005, 266 p. (In Russ.).McCabe D. L. It Takes a Village: Academic Dishonesty & Educational Opportunity // Liberal Education. 2005. Vol. 91, nr 3. P. 26–31.McCabe D. L. It Takes a Village: Academic Dishonesty & Educational Opportunity. Liberal Education, 2005, vol. 91, nr 3, pp. 26–31. (In Eng.).Pecorari D., Petric B. Plagiarism in Second-Language Writing // Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 47, nr 3. P. 269–302. DOI 10.1017/S0261444814000056.Pecorari D., Petric B. Plagiarism in Second-Language Writing. Language Teaching, 2014, vol. 47, nr 3, рр. 269–302. doi 10.1017/S0261444814000056. (In Eng.).Шмелева Е. Д. Плагиат и списывание в российских вузах: роль образовательной среды и индивидуальных характеристик студента // Вопросы образования. 2016. № 1. С. 84–109.Shmeleva E. D. Plagiat i spisyvanie v rossiiskikh vuzakh: rol’ obrazovatel’noi sredy i individual’nykh kharakteristik studenta [Plagiarism and Cheating in Russian Universities: the Role of the Learning Environment and Personal Characteristics of Students]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2016, nr 1, pp. 84–109.Дремова О. В., Малошонок Н. Г., Терентьев Е. А. В поисках справедливости в университете: критика и оправдание практик академического мошенничества студентами // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 4 (158). С. 366–394. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.972. (In Russ.).Dremova O. V., Maloshonok N. G., Terentev E. A. V poiskakh spravedlivosti v universitete: kritika i opravdanie praktik akademicheskogo moshennichestva studentami [Seeking Justice in Academia: Criticism and Justification of Student Academic Dishonesty]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal], 2020, nr 4 (158), рр. 366–394. doi 10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.972. (In Russ.).Дремова О. В., Бекова С. К. Этические кодексы в университетах: что и как они регулируют? // Образовательная политика. 2021. (в печати).Dremova O. V., Bekova S. K. Eticheskie kodeksy v universitetakh: chto i kak oni reguliruyut? [University Codes of Ethics: What Do They Regulate and How?]. Obrazovatel’naya politika [Educational policy], 2021, in print. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.