<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">umj</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Университетское управление: практика и анализ</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>University Management: Practice and Analysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1999-6640</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1999-6659</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15826/umpa.2020.02.012</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">umj-1195</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯМИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Библиометрический анализ взаимодействия ученых в российских вузах: кооперация vs индивидуальная продуктивность</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Collaboration in Russian Universities: Cooperation vs Individual Productivity</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Матвеева</surname><given-names>Н. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Matveeva</surname><given-names>N. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Матвеева Наталия Николаевна – стажер-исследователь, Институт институциональных исследований </p><p>109028, Москва, ул. Покровский бульвар, 11</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Natalia N. Matveeva – Research Assistant, The Center for Institutional Studies</p><p>11 Pokrovsky Boulevard, Moscow, 109028</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nmatveeva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Матвеева Н.Н., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Матвеева Н.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Matveeva N.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1195">https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/1195</self-uri><abstract><p>В работе исследуется динамика взаимодействия представителей ведущих российских вузов за период с 2010 года по 2018 год включительно. Динамика научного сотрудничества в вузах оценивается на индивидуальном уровне и на уровне взаимодействия с другими организациями. Понимание, как устроена научная кооперация, какова ее дисциплинарная специфика и в чем состоят особенности кооперации в публикациях разного качества, – необходимое требование для организации в вузах научной деятельности. На основе библиометрических данных в статье анализируется, как изменилось число авторов и аффилируемых организаций в публикациях из различных научных областей и качественных сегментов. В вошедших в выборку для исследования вузах наблюдается рост научной кооперации как между отдельными учеными, так и между организациями. Число работ в соавторстве с представителями российских организаций выше, чем с представителями организаций зарубежных, однако доля таких работ в общем массиве публикаций стремительно снижается. В сегменте публикаций высокого качества вузы взаимодействуют чаще, чем в сегменте публикаций более низкого качества. При этом для взаимодействий в высококачественном сегменте характерно сотрудничество с зарубежными организациями, а в сегменте публикаций более низкого качества – с организациями российскими. Наибольшая доля научного сотрудничества выявлена в области физических наук, а наименьшая – в области наук социальных. Ограничением представленной работы является использование в ней данных, не в полной мере отражающих взаимодействие между организациями. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper studies the dynamics of scientific collaborations in leading Russian universities during 2010–2018. The author analyzes both individual and inter-organizational collaboration. Understanding how scientific cooperation is organized, its disciplinary specifics and qualitative differences provides important information for organizing scientific activities in universities. Based on bibliometric data we analyze changes in the number of authors and affiliated organizations according to publications from various scientific fields and quality segments. The sampling of the universities shows the growth of scientific collaboration both among individual scientists and among organizations. The number of works co-authored with Russian organizations is higher than with foreign ones, but the share of such works is rapidly decreasing. In the segment of high quality publications, universities collaborate more often than in the lower quality segment. At the same time, in the high quality segment universities more often collaborate with foreign institutions, whereas in the lower quality segment – with Russian organizations. The highest share of scientific collaboration is observed in physical sciences, the lowest – in social sciences. The analysis is limited by the data, which do not represent all collaborations between scientists.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>научное взаимодействие</kwd><kwd>кооперация университетов</kwd><kwd>дисциплинарная специфика</kwd><kwd>соавторство</kwd><kwd>российские университеты</kwd><kwd>библиометрия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>scientific collaboration</kwd><kwd>university cooperation</kwd><kwd>disciplinary specifics</kwd><kwd>co-authorship</kwd><kwd>Russian universities</kwd><kwd>bibliometrics</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в ходе работы по Программе фундаментальных исследований НИУ ВШЭ с использованием средств субсидии в рамках государственной поддержки ведущих университетов Российской Федерации «5–100».</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program and funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project 5-100.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zuccala A. Modeling the invisible college // Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57, no. 2. P. 152–168. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20256 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zuccala A. Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 152–168. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20256 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Influence of the program «5-top 100» on the publication activity of Russian universities / T. Turko, G. Bakhturin, V. Bagan [et al.] // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 109, no. 2. P. 769– 782. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turko T. et al. Influence of the program «5-top 100» on the publication activity of Russian universities. Scientometrics, 2016, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 769–782. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matveeva N., Sterligov I., Yudkevich M. The Russian University Excellence Initiative: Is It Really Excellence that Is Promoted? // Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP. 2019. Vol. 49. P. 3–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391182 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matveeva N., Sterligov I., Yudkevich M. The Russian University Excellence Initiative: Is It Really Excellence that Is Promoted? Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP, 2019, vol. 49, pp. 3–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391182 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guskov A. E., Kosyakov D. V., Selivanova I. V. Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 117, no. 2. P. 1053–1080. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guskov A. E., Kosyakov D. V., Selivanova I. V. Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough. Scientometrics, 2018, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 1053–1080. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glänzel W., Schubert A. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship // Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer, Dordrecht, 2004. P. 257– 276. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glänzel W., Schubert A. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer, Dordrecht, 2004, pp. 257–276. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge // Science. 2007. Vol. 316, no. 5827. P. 1036–1039. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 2007, vol. 316, no. 5827, pp. 1036–1039. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sonnenwald D. H. Scientific collaboration // Annual review of information science and technology. 2007. Vol. 41, no. 1. P. 643–681. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sonnenwald D. H. Scientific collaboration. Annual review of information science and technology, 2007, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 643–681. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies / M. Gibbons (Ed.). Sage, 1994. 171 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2076669 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibbons M. (ed.). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, 1994. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2076669 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clark B. Y., Llorens J. J. Investments in scientific research: Examining the funding threshold effects on scientific collaboration and variation by academic discipline // Policy Studies Journal. 2012. Vol. 40, no. 4. P. 698–729. URL: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00470.x (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clark B. Y., Llorens J. J. Investments in scientific research: Examining the funding threshold effects on scientific collaboration and variation by academic discipline. Policy Studies Journal, 2012, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 698–729. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541–0072.2012.00470.x (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kronegger L., Ferligoj A., Doreian P. On the dynamics of national scientific systems // Quality &amp; Quantity. 2011. Vol. 45, no. 5. P. 989-1015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9484-3 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kronegger L., Ferligoj A., Doreian P. On the dynamics of national scientific systems. Quality &amp; Quantity, 2011, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 989-1015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9484-3 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cummings J. N., Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations // Research Policy. 2007. Vol. 36, no. 10. P. 1620–1634. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cummings J. N., Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 2007, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1620–1634. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Endersby J. W. Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit // Social Science Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 77. P. 375–392. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Endersby J. W. Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 1996, vol. 77, pp. 375–392. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bikard M., Murray F., Gans J. S. Exploring tradeoffs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward // Management science. 2015. Vol. 61, no. 7. P. 1473–1495. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bikard M., Murray F., Gans J. S. Exploring tradeoffs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management science, 2015, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1473–1495. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawlings C. M.., McFarland D. A. Influence flows in the academy: Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers // Social Science Research. 2011. Vol. 40, no. 3. P. 1001–1017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rawlings C. M., McFarland D. A. Influence flows in the academy: Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers. Social Science Research, 2011, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1001–1017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Associating co-authorship patterns with publications in high-impact journals / M. Bales, D. Dine, J. Merrill [et al.] // Journal of biomedical informatics. 2014. Vol. 52. P. 311– 318. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.015 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bales M. E. et al. Associating co-authorship patterns with publications in high-impact journals. Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014, vol. 52, pp. 311–318. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.015 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ni P., An X. Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 116, no. 2. P. 863–877. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ni P., An X. Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 2018, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 863–877. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A. How do you define and measure research productivity? // Scientometrics. 2014. Vol. 101, no. 2. P. 1129–1144. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A. How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 1129–1144. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adams J. D. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth // Journal of political economy. 1990. Vol. 98, no. 4. P. 673–702. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/261702 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adams J. D. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of political economy, 1990, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 673–702. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/261702 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leahey E. From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration // Annual review of sociology. 2016. Vol. 42. P. 81–100. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leahey E. From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual review of sociology, 2016, vol. 42, pp. 81–100. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Артамонова Ю. Д., Демчук А. Л. Развитие академической мобильности в вузах России и ФГОС // Высшее образование в России. 2012. № 12. С. 3–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Artamonova Yu., Demchuk A. Razvitie akademicheskoi mobil’nosti v vuzakh Rossii i FGOS [The development of academic mobility in Russian HEIs and new FSEs]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2012, no. 12, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ivanov V. V., Markusova V. A., Mindeli L. E. Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016. Vol. 86, no. 4. P. 314– 321. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331616040031 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanov V. V., Markusova V. A., Mindeli L. E. Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 314–321. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331616040031 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Bibliometric analysis of the flow of publications by Novosibirsk State University in collaboration with the RAS Siberian Branch // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 87, no. 5. P. 445– 453. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331617050057 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. Bibliometric analysis of the flow of publications by Novosibirsk State University in collaboration with the RAS Siberian Branch. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 445–453. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331617050057 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pislyakov V., Shukshina E. Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 65, no. 11. P. 2321–2330. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23093 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pislyakov V., Shukshina E. Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 2321–2330. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23093 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 106, no. 1. P. 213–228. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 2016, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 213–228. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miranda R., Garcia-Carpintero E. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas // Scientometrics. 2019. Vol. 121, no. 1. P. 479–501. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miranda R., Garcia-Carpintero E. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics, 2019, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 479–501. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sanfilippo P., Hewitt A. W., Mackey D. A. Plurality in multi-disciplinary research: multiple institutional affiliations are associated with increased citations // PeerJ. 2018. Vol. 6. P. 56–64. URL: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5664 (дата обращения: 25.04.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sanfilippo P., Hewitt A. W., Mackey D. A. Plurality in multi-disciplinary research: multiple institutional affiliations are associated with increased citations. Peer J., 2018, vol. 6, pp. 56–64. URL: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5664 (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
